Active Users:324 Time:06/07/2025 11:51:53 PM
The case for polygamy has really weakened rather than strenghtened, you might say. Legolas Send a noteboard - 20/10/2012 03:53:34 PM
Historically, polygamy has existed in many societies, much more so than gay marriage, but the logic behind them was socio-economic in most cases. To take Muhammad's case, his main reasons for contracting additional marriages tended to be either creating closer ties to the family of those women, or charity towards widows of fallen comrades who would be hard-pressed to feed themselves and their children without income. Other reasons included being able to share the workload of the household among several women, factors of prestige, and so on. But polygamous marriages between three or more people who did so just because they all loved each other and wanted to go through life together... not so much.

Of course, the evolution in marriage in general that has made gay marriage more relevant and more of an issue now than it used to be - i.e., the shift, in the West at least, from an institution that was at least to a large extent socio-economic to one that is predominantly romantic - also might make this new kind of polygamy, the truly polyamorous kind, more relevant. How many of those relationships are there, though? I would think even today, and even in the West, polygamy if legal would primarily be practiced in the traditional way and for the traditional reasons, either among radical Mormon sects, or among conservative Muslims from countries like Saudi Arabia, like in your example. And I'm not convinced that that's something that should be encouraged.

Which, incidentally, means your "I'm not asking opponents of gay marriage because I already know what they'd say" is not quite accurate - it's a small minority of conservatives that would favour polygamy, and almost exclusively those belonging to a few specific religions or denominations, but it's still there and from what I can see, it's probably more numerous than the progressives who want it because they're in a genuinely polyamorous relationship.

I have issues with this new-style polygamy for practical reasons too, obviously - it's hard to see how they could work all that out.
Reply to message
For all you supporters of Gay Marriage: What about polygamy? - 20/10/2012 12:02:06 AM 1447 Views
Legal rights. - 20/10/2012 12:14:10 AM 843 Views
It almost sounds like you are saying... - 20/10/2012 12:31:40 AM 831 Views
That is what I'm saying it. - 20/10/2012 01:07:50 AM 807 Views
Technically, privileges, not rights. - 20/10/2012 04:16:45 AM 813 Views
Sure - 20/10/2012 12:35:53 AM 740 Views
All for it... For adults over the age of 18. *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:18:04 AM 507 Views
What about it? - 20/10/2012 01:21:17 AM 806 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:51:25 AM 537 Views
+2 *NM* - 20/10/2012 11:18:39 AM 409 Views
should be legal, would be nice for poly people. should include polygyny and polyandry. *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:29:05 AM 412 Views
poly people? - 20/10/2012 12:44:01 PM 838 Views
Government needs to stop legislating morality. So yes *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:36:37 AM 399 Views
That's a huge chunk of what government does. - 20/10/2012 04:35:45 PM 777 Views
That's not what I'm saying - 21/10/2012 03:21:08 AM 801 Views
So you're opposed to abortion and gun control then? Welcome aboard! - 21/10/2012 06:14:14 AM 753 Views
Why do you keep talking about gay marriage and polygamy in the same sentence.. - 20/10/2012 03:58:26 AM 818 Views
Get a grip. Your response is just what I tried to avoid. - 20/10/2012 04:33:40 AM 745 Views
The more fool you. - 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM 835 Views
Ha! Point. *NM* - 20/10/2012 05:40:34 AM 679 Views
Marriage is always a choice, whatever the motive(s.) - 22/10/2012 04:00:40 PM 771 Views
I got no opinion on it. - 20/10/2012 12:51:43 PM 869 Views
The case for polygamy has really weakened rather than strenghtened, you might say. - 20/10/2012 03:53:34 PM 961 Views
The idea of a group marriage makes me uncomfortable - 20/10/2012 04:19:48 PM 745 Views
As long as it is equitable - 20/10/2012 05:55:57 PM 741 Views
The state shouldn't even recognize marriage beyond name changes anyway - 21/10/2012 03:52:40 AM 816 Views
Indeed - 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM 881 Views
I don't give a damn what you call it. That's your business. - 21/10/2012 06:17:40 AM 1153 Views
And so? - 21/10/2012 07:05:08 AM 775 Views
Re: And so? - 21/10/2012 04:10:19 PM 959 Views
Legal contracts must be open to all consenting adults, or none. - 22/10/2012 03:11:55 PM 836 Views
You are correct, yet your reasoning is flawed. - 23/10/2012 03:20:25 PM 749 Views
Again, the Equal Protection Clause has far less force on private entities than on government. - 23/10/2012 03:52:06 PM 688 Views
Much less force, yes. - 23/10/2012 04:15:03 PM 695 Views
The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 04:43:25 PM 766 Views
+1 *NM* - 23/10/2012 07:36:46 PM 345 Views
No the analogy is not exact, nor legally the same... - 23/10/2012 07:33:25 PM 660 Views
Analogy is not equality, only similarity. - 24/10/2012 04:37:29 PM 867 Views
We aren't asking for something better or different. - 23/10/2012 04:27:04 PM 751 Views
yeah, it is very circular. - 23/10/2012 07:44:33 PM 789 Views

Reply to Message