Active Users:609 Time:28/09/2024 12:19:47 AM
What I said is correct. Narg Send a noteboard - 16/10/2012 05:49:13 PM
Labelling anybody that supports protecting the definition of marriage as "hateful bigots" is indeed dehumanizing the enemy. Dehumanization is done so that you can with a more clear conscience rail against them (not just their positions).

You may think that basing their political position on the bible is stupid and wrong, but throwing around "hateful bigotry" as the underlying motivation for the positions they take is indeed the dehumanization I was talking about.

It has been a very effective tool, as always. Anybody that thinks marriage should be restricted to a man and a woman is automatically "filled with hate". I've heard this or a variation of it thousands of times. Any opposition to changing the definition of marriage is decried as motivated by hatred. It is the rallying cry against opponents of gay marriage. It is exactly the kind of labeling used to make those who oppose you into something other than humans with a very different point of view. On every side of every dispute there are people that do this.

A little learning is a dangerous thing.
Reply to message
A Bible belt conservative spent a year pretending to be gay - 14/10/2012 12:25:34 PM 851 Views
Plenty of the comments are really disheartening - 14/10/2012 07:23:42 PM 434 Views
It's like what I heard on the radio. - 14/10/2012 10:42:43 PM 379 Views
Interesting article. *NM* - 15/10/2012 02:28:09 PM 170 Views
"The vast majority of conservative Christians are not hateful bigots at all." - 15/10/2012 10:55:34 PM 390 Views
He does say his mother came around in the end. - 15/10/2012 10:57:50 PM 340 Views
"All politics is local." - 15/10/2012 11:04:41 PM 471 Views
Maybe most conservative christians... - 15/10/2012 11:44:13 PM 382 Views
Sorry, that is just an attempted role-reversal; objecting to hatred is not the "real hatred." - 16/10/2012 01:26:39 AM 342 Views
In addition, the bible doesn't forbid it. The bible is not a monolithic work, but an anthology. - 16/10/2012 02:32:59 AM 468 Views
Go you. - 16/10/2012 03:59:48 AM 388 Views
What I said is correct. - 16/10/2012 05:49:13 PM 323 Views
Hm. *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:58:35 PM 243 Views

Reply to Message