I know what "spouseS" and fake pics of Obamas mom in bondage gear for a porn magazine mean. - Edit 1
Before modification by Joel at 03/10/2012 11:23:49 PM
Obama's mother had a thing for exotic spouses,
Look the word SPOUSE the fuck up, moron. It had nothing to do with sex or promiscuity, which I never implied about Stanley Ann and everything to do with a shallow fixation on race and white guilt, which she seems to share with the media and any number of politically correct people.
Back in the '50s a white college girl marrying a black foreigner then conceiving a bastard future US president during kinky sex with a DIFFERENT black socialist was the John Birch Societys literal wet dream (raising the question of who the REAL freaks are) but it remains disgusting for completely different reasons than they claim.
to elaborate? Trent Lott was not elected to Congress until well after the LBJ secured passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and Strom Thurmond staged the longest one-man filibuster in history against the Civil Rights Act of 1957, so I honestly have no idea wtf you were talking about in that last sentence.
Since you cite the two acts, you know damn well what I am talking about."Despite voting for a Civil Rights act future Democratic heroes LBJ & Sam Ervin disparaged."
Despite WHOM voting for them? Not Thurmond, whose anti-civil rights filibusters are infamous (to everyone but Lott.) Not Lott, who did not even become a Congressional aide until 1968, long after both acts had passed. So wtf are you trying to excuse by saying he voted for a civil rights act? LBJ refused to support the Civil Rights Act of 1957 for the same reason he said, "I just lost the South for a generation," when he approved and signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Here is Trent Lotts record from that era: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,399310,00.html
So which Republicans are you offering a free pass for embracing the Klan vote without which the party would have passed into irrelevancy 30 years ago?
The next five years of Clintons consensual sex with Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky was just selling titillation.
Consensual, being apparently in the eye of the liberal, rather than Juanita Brodderick.Not according to Juanita Broaddricks first sworn statement. So was her first statement perjury, or her second...?
You know the Catholic catechism better than I, but I know no Old or New Testament passage that affirms wife-swapping as holy.
Claims made (by a woman of suspect credibility when it comes to sexual indignation) in a confidential child custody dispute, as opposed to actual divorce procedings under oath, are a far cry from being guilty of wife-swapping. Ryan, IIRC, claimed that they didn't know what the clubs were (but it's easy for a foreigner to discern code words describing sex clubs in another country, right? ), and left when they realized it was more than either was comfortable with. Jeri's accusations might be dead-on-balls accurrate, but also sound a lot like the equivocal language I hear from domestic "victims" when they're trying to get the other party in legal trouble, a week before they're back together or pulling the same crap with different spouses.Republicans like to pretend New York and New Orleans are not "real America," but Jack Ryan was not ACTUALLY a foreigner in either, and I am fairly confident most signs in both are in English. Certainly the cages and whips should have tipped him off to what went on there, but trying to force his wife into public sex acts there indicate he was already well aware. Apparently none of that matters either though because 1) his ex-wife is a whore just like Obamas mom and 2) being Republican makes Ryan above reproach, or at least automatically superior to even the best Democrat. Even a yellow dog is acceptable as long as he runs as a Republican, right?
, on the other hand, made his most famous and widely known judgment in a hotly disputed child custody case, so the Bible DOES support the notion that people will lie and do counter-indicated things when it comes to custody of children. Like claim in a private hearing that their spouse once tried to get them to try S&M.
So the seamiest accusations a stranger makes about a Democrats mother when she is dead and cannot defend herself should be taken on faith, but all accusations a Republicans wife makes in a court of law should be dismissed as biased. I guess when a party starts a civil war to gain power on the pretext of "ending slavery," sells out the slaves to Jim Crow for the sake of keeping power just a decade later, and embraces the Klan to regain power a century later, double standards are the only standard of which they are capable.