Active Users:319 Time:19/04/2025 05:31:35 PM
in their official response to the whole incident....? moondog Send a noteboard - 26/09/2012 04:14:52 AM
tate says he did not push off. we see how much *his* word is worth as well :rolleyes:

Shields lost his footing and went down, which makes it look worse than it was, but the contact only occurred because Shields moved into Tate as the latter prepared to catch the ball. No one who moves into another player who is looking for the ball will get a PI call in their favor, whether they go fall or not.

shields lost his footing because tate pushed him. even the NFL head office acknowledges that much...

Not disputing, just asking.


"While the ball is in the air, Tate can be seen shoving Green Bay cornerback Sam Shields to the ground. This should have been a penalty for offensive pass interference, which would have ended the game. It was not called and is not reviewable in instant replay."
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
link
Reply to message
/NFL: now that replacement refs have cost the packers a win, can we please get the real ones back? *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:14:58 AM 683 Views
I was gonna keep it to one thread, but hell, I'll join yours. - 25/09/2012 05:24:26 AM 747 Views
Link? Clip? - 25/09/2012 05:27:07 AM 701 Views
Let's just say that Gruden used the word "Jobbed" in the live telecast. *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:35:08 AM 433 Views
Here's a link. - 25/09/2012 05:36:56 AM 792 Views
Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:47:07 AM 615 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:52:55 AM 847 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 06:13:46 AM 803 Views
youtube link - 25/09/2012 07:00:29 AM 808 Views
Thanks; that looks like a textbook case of simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver: TD. - 25/09/2012 07:29:28 AM 700 Views
pete carroll is a cheating douchebag, you cannot take his word for what happened - 25/09/2012 10:59:33 AM 966 Views
I did not; I watched the clip: Simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver. - 26/09/2012 01:30:18 AM 1307 Views
watch a better replay if you can - 26/09/2012 02:38:17 AM 765 Views
Have now; still not convinced. - 26/09/2012 04:01:23 AM 809 Views
that's ok. you're still wrong - 26/09/2012 04:12:56 AM 822 Views
I know you are but what am I? *MN* - 26/09/2012 04:48:47 AM 767 Views
also, the pass interference on tate that wasn't called is clear at 0:56 in that clip - 25/09/2012 11:27:36 AM 774 Views
Tate was looking for the ball, and raised his hands to catch it, not push off Sam Shields. - 26/09/2012 01:33:46 AM 732 Views
watch a better replay and get back to me on this one. - 26/09/2012 02:36:43 AM 775 Views
Where did the NFL head office acknowledge that? - 26/09/2012 03:52:36 AM 864 Views
in their official response to the whole incident....? - 26/09/2012 04:14:52 AM 998 Views
How have you not seen this play? Are you in a cave? *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:57:55 PM 375 Views
No, I am in Norway, where NFL coverage is rather limited. - 26/09/2012 01:40:07 AM 908 Views
Wait, you're not in Houston? *NM* - 26/09/2012 01:42:45 AM 391 Views
Not since the Texas Sesquicentennial, no. - 26/09/2012 01:45:29 AM 679 Views
While you can hardly blame the replacement refs because they are basically trainees... - 25/09/2012 06:05:22 AM 882 Views
Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 06:27:42 AM 876 Views
Re: Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 02:48:56 PM 791 Views
I have still only seen the YouTube clip, but it looked like they both had both hands on the ball. - 26/09/2012 01:58:27 AM 709 Views
There are good views on nfl.com. Will link. - 26/09/2012 02:16:51 AM 856 Views
Thanks; I still do not see much to change my mind. - 26/09/2012 02:32:43 AM 786 Views
The last call was a joke. - 25/09/2012 06:52:59 AM 735 Views
Tie goes to the receiver - the rule for decades. The Packers benefitted from worse calls last year - 25/09/2012 11:31:47 AM 814 Views
you probably think greedo shot first too..... - 25/09/2012 01:49:03 PM 766 Views
They can't reverse that call. - 25/09/2012 04:43:28 PM 851 Views
the only possible way was to rule it incomplete - 25/09/2012 10:42:25 PM 823 Views
Congrats Cannoli, you are the only person (thing?) in the country who thinks it's a TD *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:53:18 PM 500 Views
I'm not even the only person in this thread, moron. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:07:48 PM 407 Views
Joel hasn't even seen the play, douchebag *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:12:35 PM 374 Views
Just so you can get this information without namecalling ... - 25/09/2012 04:18:41 PM 737 Views
No I mean he hasn't seen the replay over and over on ESPN *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:21:46 PM 381 Views
Interesting. What is the rule with arguing refs? - 25/09/2012 05:18:35 PM 681 Views
That response was disturbingly like my thoughts on the play. - 26/09/2012 01:49:37 AM 776 Views
As a Seahawks fan. - 25/09/2012 02:10:58 PM 730 Views
No. Not with that attitude. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:03:32 PM 358 Views
*throws public tantrum* *NM* - 25/09/2012 10:39:22 PM 345 Views
Here's the proof Cannoli is refusing to see - 25/09/2012 05:54:07 PM 822 Views
Clearer shot, but stills do not allow us to see where Tates hands were at all times. - 26/09/2012 02:10:25 AM 631 Views
you can't claim "good ol' strip" *AND* simultaneous catch -- which is it? - 26/09/2012 02:35:41 AM 1062 Views
I do not claim both: I claim simultaneous catch but IF not, then strip. - 26/09/2012 03:51:47 AM 1047 Views
you sure you saw the right replay? - 26/09/2012 04:21:57 AM 746 Views
Think so, yeah. - 26/09/2012 04:58:15 AM 866 Views
from another angle -- pun intended - 26/09/2012 04:01:54 PM 739 Views
There are two separate issues: 1) Was it a simultaneous catch; 2) IF not, was it a strip? - 27/09/2012 08:54:52 AM 916 Views
your opinion is against pretty much everyone in the world, so..... *shrug* - 27/09/2012 03:55:33 PM 966 Views
Thanks; I did not expect you to give in so easily. - 27/09/2012 10:14:30 PM 776 Views
did you even read that article??? - 28/09/2012 12:35:39 AM 786 Views
"his control wasn’t established again...." - 28/09/2012 01:08:03 AM 1075 Views
wow, what a thorough analysis you sent me either way, you're still wrong - 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM 866 Views
That is not an argument. - 28/09/2012 02:26:58 AM 679 Views

Reply to Message