Active Users:448 Time:04/04/2025 03:30:00 AM
It was a sideline from the major point and not my motivation, as Dannymac insinuates. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 25/09/2012 04:09:48 PM
Pressuring the the league into knuckling under to the officials' demands will not greatly improve the quality of the game, possibly not even in the short-term (as the replacements get better, and the unionists' skills deteriorate with unuse), and it will be another cost to be passed onto the fans. And the officials' union will gain clout, prestige, moral authority, whatever you want to call it, and officiating reforms will be even harder to put through, as the union resists anything that might embarass or replace its constituency.


what is all this about if you're not trying to make an anti-union argument?
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
A good point regarding the replacement officials - 24/09/2012 02:55:12 PM 940 Views
You must not be watching the games - 24/09/2012 05:09:20 PM 497 Views
And there you have it. (Monday Night Football update.) - 25/09/2012 05:18:37 AM 478 Views
That was the right call. "Union" has nothing to do with it. - 25/09/2012 11:37:39 AM 597 Views
why the union comments at the end of your post if it had nothing to do with your argument? - 25/09/2012 03:38:28 PM 488 Views
It was a sideline from the major point and not my motivation, as Dannymac insinuates. - 25/09/2012 04:09:48 PM 491 Views
No, it was not. And yes, it does. - 25/09/2012 05:11:52 PM 393 Views
^This +1,000,000 *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:20:51 PM 224 Views
The replay officals are not replacements. Maybe Rodgers just isn't a clutch QB *NM* - 25/09/2012 11:44:29 AM 204 Views
Hmm? - 25/09/2012 05:01:26 PM 456 Views
Like DK I was being a smart ass - 25/09/2012 06:17:12 PM 457 Views
I agree with Cannoli, sadly. These officials are not much worse if at all. - 26/09/2012 01:51:30 AM 645 Views
I love the replacement refs - 26/09/2012 04:25:42 PM 427 Views

Reply to Message