And here's a straight-up "caused one team to be able to win" situation:
Jragghen Send a noteboard - 24/09/2012 09:39:33 PM
"Replacement officials, in essence, put the Titans in field goal range for their eventual game-winning kick in overtime by marking off 27 yards, instead of 15, after an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty against linebacker Stephen Tulloch. Sports Illustrated's Peter King theorized that referee Gerald Wright marked off the penalty from the Lions' 44-yard line instead of the Titans' 44, which was actually the original line of scrimmage. So instead of taking over at the Lions' 41-yard line, the Titans got the ball at the 29. Place-kicker Rob Bironas, who had already missed two field goals in the game, eventually was put in place to boot an easy 26-yarder. The Lions could have avoided the entire mess if Tulloch didn't commit the penalty, but it's a basic expectation of any referee to maintain an accurate line of scrimmage."
A good point regarding the replacement officials
24/09/2012 02:55:12 PM
- 940 Views
"still doesn’t understand how timeouts or challenges work. Advantage: replacement refs." REALLY?!
24/09/2012 07:21:41 PM
- 645 Views
You see what you did, Cannoli? You made me agree with Joel
*NM*
24/09/2012 07:41:02 PM
- 186 Views

Only fair; you and rt made me agree with Cannoli in the Eli vs. Romo threads.
24/09/2012 11:35:22 PM
- 568 Views

And here's a straight-up "caused one team to be able to win" situation:
24/09/2012 09:39:33 PM
- 696 Views
"it's a basic expectation of any referee to maintain an accurate line of scrimmage."
24/09/2012 11:43:06 PM
- 666 Views
And there you have it. (Monday Night Football update.)
25/09/2012 05:18:37 AM
- 477 Views
That was the right call. "Union" has nothing to do with it.
25/09/2012 11:37:39 AM
- 597 Views
why the union comments at the end of your post if it had nothing to do with your argument?
25/09/2012 03:38:28 PM
- 488 Views
It was a sideline from the major point and not my motivation, as Dannymac insinuates.
25/09/2012 04:09:48 PM
- 490 Views
The replay officals are not replacements. Maybe Rodgers just isn't a clutch QB *NM*
25/09/2012 11:44:29 AM
- 204 Views
Hmm?
25/09/2012 05:01:26 PM
- 456 Views
He was being sarcastic. See our earlier posts about Romo and Eli Manning *NM*
25/09/2012 05:21:16 PM
- 188 Views
Maybe Rodgers should have played at his apparent high level of play the entire game. *NM*
26/09/2012 01:52:40 AM
- 198 Views
maybe people should rate QB simply by which team wins the game *NM*
26/09/2012 05:43:04 PM
- 196 Views
QBs should in part be rated on wins. I mean, that is afterall the result desired.
27/09/2012 02:36:04 PM
- 500 Views
I agree with Cannoli, sadly. These officials are not much worse if at all.
26/09/2012 01:51:30 AM
- 644 Views
there is a huge difference between blowing a call and not understanding the rules of the game
25/09/2012 03:35:44 PM
- 471 Views