Active Users:1180 Time:22/11/2024 11:35:35 PM
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. nossy Send a noteboard - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM
Reason actions (those from within the last ten years) are a pretty good indicator of who someone really is, and if someone is going to be talking about tax when in a position to influence tax policy then it is quite relevant, in my opinion, to know how they actually act.


Recent, maybe?

And you think that us seeing something that hasn't (presumably) been audited as fishy by the IRS will make a difference? I think people only want to see it for the same reasons as those who want to see the Kate boobies. Or the Obama birth certificate.
Reply to message
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"? - 18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM 961 Views
Wrong - 18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM 533 Views
Additional categories - 18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM 624 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM 502 Views
Re: SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 07:22:35 PM 500 Views
The wealthy get their income from investments - 18/09/2012 07:33:55 PM 572 Views
ok - 19/09/2012 05:46:49 AM 605 Views
Is that true? - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM 547 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM 213 Views
No - 18/09/2012 06:56:43 PM 524 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's? - 18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM 486 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me - 18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM 456 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM 429 Views
You gave that away with your first post - 18/09/2012 11:49:28 PM 412 Views
No way! - 19/09/2012 01:41:04 PM 452 Views
Yuh huh! - 19/09/2012 08:56:01 PM 479 Views
As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM 502 Views
Re: As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM 455 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though.... - 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM 485 Views
Different situation then the Birther stuff - 19/09/2012 07:02:09 AM 429 Views
It's a conflict of interest. - 21/09/2012 09:52:58 PM 433 Views
I think you got it wrong: - 19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM 444 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM* - 19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM 198 Views
Easier to read/understand - WSJ data on the 47% - 19/09/2012 05:25:01 AM 593 Views

Reply to Message