So then you don't Bush for the 2008 when dems controlled both houses? *NM*
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 05/09/2012 07:36:29 PM
Clinton signing off on their legislation does not make him solely responsible; did you not just yesterday point out Congress has far more control over new legislation than the president? Clinton shares blame for allowing their insanity to become law, yes, but once again, it is ridiculous when Republicans argue all their irresponsible disasters are the fault of Dems for not opposing Republicans enough.
But Obama is and was a big fan of pushing banks to give people loans they couldn't afford and to see he is blameless is false.
Joel the difference between me using Daily Caller and disagreeing with PolitiFact (Tampa Bay Times) is I don't claim they are the final arbitrator of the truth. If you have some evidience that they are inaccurate then show but don't ask like it is written in stone just becuase someone sprinkled it with magic factchecker fairy dust.
Facts are facts; they do not change, whoever reports them. Are you seriously claiming it is a "fact" that a national federal policy spanning two presidencies and almost an entire decade was cause solely by a young lawyer Chicago lawsuit? Can you show me any instance of Gramm referencing a Chicago lawsuit when arguing Glass-Steagall be repealed? For that matter, what does minority lending have to do with the Glass-Steagall repeal that caused the subprime mortgage disaster?
This is just the same old "minorities caused the subprime mortgage disaster, not greedy, irresponsible and often feloniously fraudulent megabanks." It is an old popular GOP deflection: Does any evidence support it? Is there a record of minority subprime loans defaulting at a higher rate than subprime loans to white people? Or is it just criminal bankers blaming their theft and fraud on poor blacks and hispanics?
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result - New Obama Ad
04/09/2012 04:42:06 AM
- 1234 Views
The question is not if 4 more Obama years will be better, but if 8 Romney years will be worse.
04/09/2012 05:06:42 AM
- 935 Views
Romney may do some good, maybe he won't.....but I know Obama has been a disaster.....
04/09/2012 05:18:01 AM
- 676 Views
Two honest questions for you, or for anyone saying that.
04/09/2012 08:48:35 AM
- 716 Views
You're not suggesting a discussion are you? Based on arguments? *NM*
04/09/2012 09:23:51 AM
- 333 Views
Dangerous, I know. *NM*
04/09/2012 09:30:58 AM
- 335 Views
Easy answers......
04/09/2012 02:20:28 PM
- 747 Views
What's Romney saying he's going to do about these things?
04/09/2012 03:51:20 PM
- 705 Views
Yes, he's going to repeal ObamaCare and replace it with something better.....
04/09/2012 04:06:55 PM
- 716 Views
RoBamaCare; fixed that for you. (now with Edit!)
04/09/2012 04:11:06 PM
- 795 Views
I would copyright "Robamacare" if Romney did not have a prior claim.
04/09/2012 10:15:56 PM
- 681 Views

No, Obama INHERITED a disaster; unemployment is no higher than when he took office.
04/09/2012 10:13:53 PM
- 802 Views
a disaster Obama helped to create by forcing sub prime lonas on banks
04/09/2012 10:31:01 PM
- 766 Views
OMFG, Obama caused the subprime mortgage disaster now? Did he cause Pearl Harbor, too?
05/09/2012 12:04:37 AM
- 745 Views
So you agree Clinton is to blame and Bush did nothing but save things with TARP good
05/09/2012 02:41:57 PM
- 627 Views
You are adept at selective reading: GOP bill, passed by a GOP House and Senate.
05/09/2012 07:31:29 PM
- 934 Views
So then you don't Bush for the 2008 when dems controlled both houses? *NM*
05/09/2012 07:36:29 PM
- 291 Views
Any bills they wrote and passed are primarily on them, even if signed by Bush.
05/09/2012 08:54:23 PM
- 722 Views
Unemployment is higher, median income is lower, national debt is higher, gas prices are higher.....
05/09/2012 12:42:27 AM
- 653 Views
US unemployment February 2009: 8.3% US unemployment now: 8.3%
05/09/2012 12:53:08 AM
- 881 Views
Took office unemployment = 7.8% ; Now 8.3% and rising (again) *NM*
05/09/2012 12:57:54 AM
- 322 Views
How about we count the first full month he was in office.
05/09/2012 01:05:55 AM
- 629 Views
Nope..... *NM*
05/09/2012 01:09:24 AM
- 290 Views
*shrugs* Do what you like, but I doubt the American public willing to cook the books similarly.
05/09/2012 01:18:46 AM
- 711 Views
Re: Nope.....
05/09/2012 01:38:17 AM
- 686 Views
Technically, four is acceptable, even proper, if following an excerpt from a sentence.
05/09/2012 03:00:16 AM
- 697 Views
Funny how that lets not count the first month rule wasn't applied for Bush *NM*
05/09/2012 02:44:45 AM
- 281 Views
people voted for Obama and look how well that has worked out
04/09/2012 02:29:38 PM
- 751 Views
Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive.
04/09/2012 10:25:27 PM
- 662 Views
sorry but you seem to be dribbling DNC talking point all down your shirt *NM*
04/09/2012 10:28:26 PM
- 322 Views
Sorry, but I cited hard data.
04/09/2012 10:35:49 PM
- 691 Views
funny it sounded word for word like what Axelrod was spouting on the news today
05/09/2012 02:43:46 AM
- 604 Views
Once again, the beauty of hard facts is they do not change depending on source.
05/09/2012 02:58:41 AM
- 773 Views
Speaking about Obama's performance - Food Stamps usage hits new high
04/09/2012 04:53:13 PM
- 697 Views