Not as hawkish as some people would like to make him out to be. Realistically he hasn't said anything different than Obam has already said. Obama and Romney have both said they would attack if Syria uses chemical weapons and neither wants a nuclear Iran and both have stated that all options are on the table.



I believe we are done with ground wars with invasions. Appointing General Petraeus to head the CIA while putting former CIA head Panetta in charge of the Dept. of Defense made it clear the shift would be to joint CIA/Spec-Ops missions and not full scale invasions. I think the most direct involvement you might see from the U.S. military would be something along the lines of no-fly zones ala Libya. I don't think Romney is any different although there have been some neo-con hanger-ons. Of course, with Romney's record of changing his mind quite often I don't know whether he would boot these people if he wins and take on a more pragmatic view on foreign policy. I really think Romney wants to "save" the economy, not start more wars. I think he would like nothing more than to lead America into it's next boom and go down in domestic glory.