The video says his comments were 2 Feb, 2008, when the plant was open;when he took office it was not
Joel Send a noteboard - 02/09/2012 10:26:46 PM
The argument wasn't that Obama caused the plant close, a fact the opinion heavy fact checkers seem to have missed, the argument is that Obama told the people at the plant that with government help the plant could be retooled and kept open making energy efficient cars for the next hundred years. Ryan never said Obama caused the plant to close, some journalist playing at fact checker decided that is what he meant. Ryan was even clear to it was candidate Obama who had made them statement which should make it clear he was talking about broken campaign promises. The only thing Ryan said that was factually incorrect, you like fact checkers are supposed to be checking for, is that Obama didn't actually promises to keep the plant open he simply implied that he would. When fact checkers become opinion givers, which is what they became when the decided what they thought Ryan was implying, then why even call them fact checkers anymore especially when liberal rags like the Tampa Times is funding them and their fact checkers come from the same journalist school of thought who believe the only thing wrong with saying republicans like party while black people drown is doing it front of a hot mic.
So I was wrong about when he made the comment: Not June '08, when the closure was planned, nor October '08, when it was announced, nor even December '08, when the pink slips were mailed, but months earlier, February '08, nearly a year before he took office. Expecting Candidate Obama to prevent an act that occurred while he was still on the campaign trail, before he was even elected, much less inaugurated, is expecting too much. AT MOST he could only have re-opened the plant, IF he "bought GM" and took control of it as you falsely contend.
He could not save what was already lost and never promised he would. Maybe if he had been president in '08 the government support he spoke of would have saved the plant as he pledged, but he was not so it could not. By the the time he WAS president the plant was gone and could not be retroactively saved. Sorry "reality has a well known liberal bias."
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 02/09/2012 at 10:32:18 PM
how to make political convention speeches more entertaining
31/08/2012 03:57:11 PM
- 586 Views
and how fact checks the fact checkers? *NM*
31/08/2012 05:19:45 PM
- 200 Views
Fox, presumably.
31/08/2012 06:05:56 PM
- 675 Views
the fact checkers tend be journalist and deserve all the trust that goes with that *NM*
01/09/2012 10:36:18 AM
- 224 Views
Facts are facts, and not in the eye of the beholder.
01/09/2012 12:08:41 PM
- 428 Views
That might be true if fat checkers limited themsleves to facts and not opinion
01/09/2012 02:44:41 PM
- 506 Views
Stating opinions as fact invites checking them as facts.
01/09/2012 02:59:23 PM
- 638 Views
I will let Scott Wlaker explain it to you
01/09/2012 05:56:00 PM
- 617 Views
Even Walker admits "It’s closed — has been as long as Obama has been president."
01/09/2012 06:27:32 PM
- 604 Views
well since Ryan never claimed Obama caused the plant to close it doesn't matter when it closed
01/09/2012 08:10:26 PM
- 439 Views
How could he save a plant already closed?
01/09/2012 08:31:55 PM
- 423 Views
It's obvious.
01/09/2012 10:12:33 PM
- 490 Views
what is obvious is despite him saying they would his policies didn't save the plant
02/09/2012 09:48:08 PM
- 414 Views
If he could save it he shouldn't have he could but he did say he could
02/09/2012 09:43:56 PM
- 451 Views
The video says his comments were 2 Feb, 2008, when the plant was open;when he took office it was not
02/09/2012 10:26:46 PM
- 407 Views
Then what would Daily Show and Colbert do every night if someone does their work for them? *NM*
31/08/2012 09:38:17 PM
- 210 Views
presumably they would have plenty of other material to work with.... *NM*
01/09/2012 06:33:33 AM
- 230 Views
I loathe the conventions, but this will make it worse
01/09/2012 03:52:15 AM
- 467 Views
you're talking about what people who already follow these things do
01/09/2012 06:40:42 AM
- 411 Views
We fundamentally disagree
01/09/2012 01:54:26 PM
- 606 Views
The absence of either filter or rebuttal diminishes the informative value of conventions.
01/09/2012 03:21:03 PM
- 490 Views