Active Users:1000 Time:13/11/2024 06:26:17 AM
Huh, I think I hit submit by accident, before replying. Anyway: Dan Send a noteboard - 02/09/2012 12:42:38 AM
Convening in a stadium mostly built with municipal (i.e. government) bonds and trotting out successful entrepreneurs to thank Romney and Bain for all the help that got them started is a poor example of self-reliance. It says Staples, Steel Dynamics etc. only succeeded thanks to investor, supplier, employee and consumer contributions IN ADDITION TO (not instead of) its owners notable ones. Successful American businesses are the result of the American economic system, and are therefore community, not individual, achievements.

Community does not mean government. But hey, nothing like drawing a false choice between all or nothing alternatives where "more than one person's involvement" equals proof of the moral supremacy of government solutions, and a straw man position of individual accomplishment defined as accomplishments that relied on nothing from no one else. SOMEBODY ELSE MADE THE FOOD YOU ATE WHILE INVENTING THAT DEVICE IN YOUR HAND_BUILT GARAGE! OMG! YOU ARE TOTALLY RELIANT ON THE COMMUNITY, THEREFORE SOCIALISM WORKS!!!

Since the Republican National Convention culminated in that admission, what remains to debate? :confused:
Obama's implict claim that someone else is entitled to a claim for the credit and/or profits. The road was already built from taxes already paid, the municipal bonds were voluntarily purchased (not that I agree with bonds being sold for such purposes), and the community which enabled all this to happen, was established and built well before the socialist ball got rolling. Government did not create that community, it subsists off of it. Government is more concerned with interfering in the community when it does not meet the racial makeup the government thinks appropriate, or wants to consume substances the government disapproves of it buying and selling, or wants to engage in private business transactions that people who know nothing about business dislike on the grounds that the transactions might make people rich.


Isn't it fallacious to so sharply divide the past from the future, in terms of taxes? The road has been already built and the entrepreneur has succeeded, but there are further roads to be built to be utilized by further entrepreneurs. There were recent tax cuts and wars, so doesn't that just indicate that it's a pretty fluid situation?

Your comparison is like saying that anyone who buys health insurance but opposes Obamacare is a hypocrite. Not that there aren't more than their fair share of hypocrites at the RNC (i.e. anyone who opposes or supports some but not all of the various Wars on Abstract Concepts: War on Terror, War on Poverty, War on Drugs etc). Sure we'll trumpet free enterprise and lack of regulation, but pot, oh HELL no! Romney has explicitly declared military cuts off the table, IIRC, but we have no land enemies, and our naval dominance makes the British Empire's Admiralty look like pikers for merely settling for a navy bigger than any two. Ours out-floats the REST OF THE WORLD, but no. THAT government program is untouchable. If the government did not build this country, the greatest in the world (and I dare any speaker at the RNC to say otherwise), why is it okay for government to try building the Happy Democratic Utopias of Iraq & Afghanistan (and presumably Iran)?

Not that it really matters. Chris Christie effectively threw in the towel for the presidential race with a speech that was not so much in support of the Romney 2012 Campaign as the Christie 2016 Campaign.
This message last edited by Dan on 02/09/2012 at 12:46:36 AM
Reply to message
Does Not a "WE [Not I] BUILT THIS!" Banner Concede Warren and Obama Were Right? - 01/09/2012 02:45:52 PM 813 Views
It amazing how much the left doesn't get tis issue - 01/09/2012 02:55:44 PM 545 Views
It is amazing how well every sentence but your last covers the "We [not I] built this" view - 01/09/2012 03:29:27 PM 561 Views
let’s put it back in context - 01/09/2012 05:23:01 PM 655 Views
Politifact already did. - 01/09/2012 05:53:23 PM 741 Views
+1 - nicely said. The "built it" comment drives the left crazy, since they know..... - 01/09/2012 04:25:52 PM 463 Views
Nope, it drives us crazy because it's an out-of-context fragment quote - 01/09/2012 07:01:24 PM 453 Views
they all know what he said and context doesn't change it *NM* - 01/09/2012 07:11:01 PM 268 Views
...of course it does. - 01/09/2012 08:31:37 PM 499 Views
This is the kind of shit that makes me and my family not want to vote Republican. - 02/09/2012 12:01:01 AM 544 Views
Interesting response.... - 02/09/2012 12:07:01 AM 450 Views
They're both acting normal (for politicians) - 02/09/2012 12:12:31 AM 585 Views
I disagree; they both did something downright bizarre (again, for politicians; see link.) - 02/09/2012 12:20:32 AM 528 Views
Heh. - 02/09/2012 12:25:10 AM 564 Views
Yes the GOP really need to make more effort into trying to win Massachusetts - 02/09/2012 02:17:49 PM 524 Views
I don't like irrational hissyfits. - 02/09/2012 05:27:25 PM 601 Views
If don't like having hissyfits stasy on your med - 02/09/2012 09:26:50 PM 499 Views
Only if you want a Senate majority. - 02/09/2012 07:39:23 PM 685 Views
Your political philosophy seems based on ignoring the difference between voluntary & compulsory - 02/09/2012 12:38:50 AM 596 Views
Huh, I think I hit submit by accident, before replying. Anyway: - 02/09/2012 12:42:38 AM 672 Views
I don't think so - 02/09/2012 01:47:03 PM 471 Views

Reply to Message