He has a known record of bullying riders who spoke out against doping and promoted riding clean.
He has a known record of bullying riders who irritate him or hinder him, you mean. You're making it sound as if he was on an anti-anti-doping crusade.
Cycling was dirty during his heyday... but that was how he fought hard to keep it and he was happy to ruin the careers of people who tried to clean the sport up for no better reason than he could.
That's just ridiculous. Even if you take it for granted that he did take doping, as you do, that paragraph is plain ridiculous. Both the notion of him "fighting hard to keep cycling dirty" and the notion of him somehow being all-powerful to ruin careers of people.
Lance Armstrong - drugs cheat.
- 24/08/2012 10:51:35 AM
1450 Views
Delighted
- 24/08/2012 12:21:12 PM
716 Views
Re: Delighted
- 24/08/2012 12:36:20 PM
978 Views
you think the case against Contador is fishy but you cheerlead the witch hunt of Armstong?
- 25/08/2012 04:11:23 AM
742 Views
*NM*
Eh, I suspect the prevailing national narratives are going to vary some
- 24/08/2012 02:01:52 PM
868 Views
Sad thing is I wondered who would be awarded the victory now his have been stripped...
- 24/08/2012 05:31:20 PM
724 Views
And this is why I have a hard time blaming Armstrong.
- 24/08/2012 06:16:14 PM
772 Views
Hopefully they will leave the 1st places empty
- 24/08/2012 11:44:49 PM
673 Views
That is one of things I find suspicious about the denials.
- 26/08/2012 03:01:30 AM
763 Views
Or... maybe he has better things to do with his life than fight an endless witch hunt. *NM*
- 24/08/2012 06:15:42 PM
356 Views
Nah, the bully just ran into something that wouldn't back down and has gone crying. *NM*
- 24/08/2012 11:51:50 PM
358 Views
Haters gotta hate. Its not like he's gonna get a fair hearing. *NM*
- 24/08/2012 10:25:18 PM
354 Views
Yeah, they were going to use evidence and everything against him and not cower before his bullying
- 25/08/2012 12:01:44 AM
657 Views
Your reaction seems kinda over the top and spiteful, what's up with that?
- 25/08/2012 01:15:12 AM
876 Views
Pleasure at seeing someone who has bullied and blustered for so long faced with justice.
- 25/08/2012 10:11:15 AM
750 Views
You are a very small-minded person.
- 25/08/2012 04:26:46 PM
766 Views
And you are a very annoying person.
- 25/08/2012 06:06:50 PM
765 Views
I don't think 'nemesis' is a term that should be used regarding sporting events
- 25/08/2012 07:51:35 PM
825 Views
As Legolas said, I think it is apprioriate
- 26/08/2012 05:36:08 PM
638 Views
I'm really not in a position to judge, though obviously I'm inclined to disagree
- 26/08/2012 05:41:49 PM
704 Views
*NM*
i've got ten RAFOlk who testify they saw you punch babies, you should be stripped of posting here
- 25/08/2012 04:09:53 PM
699 Views
+1 - Anyone that thinks this isn't a sham/witch hunt is a moron. *NM*
- 25/08/2012 04:23:55 PM
360 Views
You're not stupid, so I'm going to assume you know why your post is nonsense.
- 26/08/2012 05:37:49 PM
630 Views
he will lose in arbitration, whether or not he is innocent. that's the point
- 28/08/2012 03:55:38 PM
792 Views
Why? And "because Lance says so" isn't a valid argument, neither is "they have too much evidence" 
- 28/08/2012 05:55:24 PM
803 Views
- 28/08/2012 05:55:24 PM
803 Views
a 58-2 record in arbitration suggests something is not quite right, imho
- 29/08/2012 04:02:59 PM
876 Views
Yes - clearly the USADA are far too conservative in their approach and should bring more charges
- 29/08/2012 04:38:34 PM
936 Views
but he was the guy who had cancer
- 26/08/2012 12:26:34 AM
688 Views
I refer you to the Goldman dilema
- 26/08/2012 05:41:26 PM
588 Views
but that's just dumb *NM*
- 26/08/2012 10:23:34 PM
453 Views
I'd guess it is a sign of the drive to win needed to be a top sportsperson
- 26/08/2012 10:51:20 PM
655 Views