Re: I really don't know anymore what to think on Armstrong.
snoopcester Send a noteboard - 24/08/2012 11:59:14 PM
At this point I'm just letting it slide past and waiting for history to sort things out one way or the other. As the article and Tom pointed out, his rivals look at least as suspicious as he does (or more, in many cases).
I'm not sure about worse - it is worth remembering that while Armstrong has declined to dispute the evidence against him, Bruyneel and others are doing so on charges they face. Which shows the level his team allegedly were at - organised from the top man downwards in a doping programme designed to win Armstrong the tour.
Then that is combined with his treatment of people like Bassons and Simeoni.
And as Larry pointed out (or hinted at, anyway), one suspects the lifetime bans would rain down by the dozens if certain other sports started testing half as strictly as cycling does. If one adopts the "everyone in cycling is still taking doping" line, it seems fairly logical to assume the same thing about every sport in which as much or more money can be made, and where testing is far less stringent.
I agree on that - I do imagine most sports have seen what happened to cycling and have made the call to try to avoid catching to many people doping. It is always worth remembering that footballers and tennis players were supposedly also on the list of dopers from Operation Puerto but only cyclists got named.
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Lance Armstrong - drugs cheat.
- 24/08/2012 10:51:35 AM
1455 Views
Delighted
- 24/08/2012 12:21:12 PM
722 Views
Re: Delighted
- 24/08/2012 12:36:20 PM
984 Views
you think the case against Contador is fishy but you cheerlead the witch hunt of Armstong?
- 25/08/2012 04:11:23 AM
747 Views
*NM*
Eh, I suspect the prevailing national narratives are going to vary some
- 24/08/2012 02:01:52 PM
874 Views
Sad thing is I wondered who would be awarded the victory now his have been stripped...
- 24/08/2012 05:31:20 PM
729 Views
And this is why I have a hard time blaming Armstrong.
- 24/08/2012 06:16:14 PM
776 Views
Hopefully they will leave the 1st places empty
- 24/08/2012 11:44:49 PM
681 Views
That is one of things I find suspicious about the denials.
- 26/08/2012 03:01:30 AM
769 Views
Or... maybe he has better things to do with his life than fight an endless witch hunt. *NM*
- 24/08/2012 06:15:42 PM
360 Views
Nah, the bully just ran into something that wouldn't back down and has gone crying. *NM*
- 24/08/2012 11:51:50 PM
362 Views
I really don't know anymore what to think on Armstrong.
- 24/08/2012 06:53:04 PM
761 Views
Re: I really don't know anymore what to think on Armstrong.
- 24/08/2012 11:59:14 PM
848 Views
Haters gotta hate. Its not like he's gonna get a fair hearing. *NM*
- 24/08/2012 10:25:18 PM
357 Views
Yeah, they were going to use evidence and everything against him and not cower before his bullying
- 25/08/2012 12:01:44 AM
662 Views
Your reaction seems kinda over the top and spiteful, what's up with that?
- 25/08/2012 01:15:12 AM
882 Views
Pleasure at seeing someone who has bullied and blustered for so long faced with justice.
- 25/08/2012 10:11:15 AM
755 Views
You are a very small-minded person.
- 25/08/2012 04:26:46 PM
773 Views
And you are a very annoying person.
- 25/08/2012 06:06:50 PM
770 Views
I don't think 'nemesis' is a term that should be used regarding sporting events
- 25/08/2012 07:51:35 PM
827 Views
As Legolas said, I think it is apprioriate
- 26/08/2012 05:36:08 PM
642 Views
I'm really not in a position to judge, though obviously I'm inclined to disagree
- 26/08/2012 05:41:49 PM
711 Views
*NM*
i've got ten RAFOlk who testify they saw you punch babies, you should be stripped of posting here
- 25/08/2012 04:09:53 PM
705 Views
+1 - Anyone that thinks this isn't a sham/witch hunt is a moron. *NM*
- 25/08/2012 04:23:55 PM
363 Views
You're not stupid, so I'm going to assume you know why your post is nonsense.
- 26/08/2012 05:37:49 PM
632 Views
he will lose in arbitration, whether or not he is innocent. that's the point
- 28/08/2012 03:55:38 PM
793 Views
Why? And "because Lance says so" isn't a valid argument, neither is "they have too much evidence" 
- 28/08/2012 05:55:24 PM
805 Views
- 28/08/2012 05:55:24 PM
805 Views
a 58-2 record in arbitration suggests something is not quite right, imho
- 29/08/2012 04:02:59 PM
884 Views
Yes - clearly the USADA are far too conservative in their approach and should bring more charges
- 29/08/2012 04:38:34 PM
940 Views
but he was the guy who had cancer
- 26/08/2012 12:26:34 AM
692 Views
I refer you to the Goldman dilema
- 26/08/2012 05:41:26 PM
590 Views
but that's just dumb *NM*
- 26/08/2012 10:23:34 PM
457 Views
I'd guess it is a sign of the drive to win needed to be a top sportsperson
- 26/08/2012 10:51:20 PM
659 Views