The damage he (among others) has done to cycling is immense. It has been obvious for a long long time he was a drug cheat and his bullying behaviour towards journalists and other cyclists shall not be missed. I'm just sad that this did not go to a full hearing so people could see the full and overwhelming case against him (which of course is why he is accepting the charge)
Yes - hopefully Bruyneel will take it to a full hearing so all the dirty laundery does get aired.
Sadly cycling still has a way to go and can't seem to learn from it's past mistakes. I think it's a disgrace that Contador will be back in next year's Tour.
To be honest, I'm not really sure where I stand on Contador - the whole situation around him seems very fishy. It does look like he got off lightly though.
His blood sample showed evidence of blood doping but the test was rejected because WADA hadn't cleared it for use, then CAS pretty much refused to the WADA expert on blood doping before ruling that blood doping was as unlikely as the steak defence. Then Contador rejected the chance to plea to having accidently taken it in a contaminated supplement and thus rejected a one year ban rather than a two year ban - there must be something really odd going on for him to have rejected an offer to take a shorter ban that cleared him of blame?
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Lance Armstrong - drugs cheat.
- 24/08/2012 10:51:35 AM
1455 Views
Delighted
- 24/08/2012 12:21:12 PM
722 Views
Re: Delighted
- 24/08/2012 12:36:20 PM
984 Views
you think the case against Contador is fishy but you cheerlead the witch hunt of Armstong?
- 25/08/2012 04:11:23 AM
747 Views
*NM*
Eh, I suspect the prevailing national narratives are going to vary some
- 24/08/2012 02:01:52 PM
873 Views
Sad thing is I wondered who would be awarded the victory now his have been stripped...
- 24/08/2012 05:31:20 PM
728 Views
And this is why I have a hard time blaming Armstrong.
- 24/08/2012 06:16:14 PM
776 Views
Hopefully they will leave the 1st places empty
- 24/08/2012 11:44:49 PM
681 Views
That is one of things I find suspicious about the denials.
- 26/08/2012 03:01:30 AM
769 Views
Or... maybe he has better things to do with his life than fight an endless witch hunt. *NM*
- 24/08/2012 06:15:42 PM
359 Views
Nah, the bully just ran into something that wouldn't back down and has gone crying. *NM*
- 24/08/2012 11:51:50 PM
362 Views
Haters gotta hate. Its not like he's gonna get a fair hearing. *NM*
- 24/08/2012 10:25:18 PM
356 Views
Yeah, they were going to use evidence and everything against him and not cower before his bullying
- 25/08/2012 12:01:44 AM
661 Views
Your reaction seems kinda over the top and spiteful, what's up with that?
- 25/08/2012 01:15:12 AM
882 Views
Pleasure at seeing someone who has bullied and blustered for so long faced with justice.
- 25/08/2012 10:11:15 AM
755 Views
You are a very small-minded person.
- 25/08/2012 04:26:46 PM
772 Views
And you are a very annoying person.
- 25/08/2012 06:06:50 PM
770 Views
I don't think 'nemesis' is a term that should be used regarding sporting events
- 25/08/2012 07:51:35 PM
826 Views
As Legolas said, I think it is apprioriate
- 26/08/2012 05:36:08 PM
641 Views
I'm really not in a position to judge, though obviously I'm inclined to disagree
- 26/08/2012 05:41:49 PM
711 Views
*NM*
i've got ten RAFOlk who testify they saw you punch babies, you should be stripped of posting here
- 25/08/2012 04:09:53 PM
704 Views
+1 - Anyone that thinks this isn't a sham/witch hunt is a moron. *NM*
- 25/08/2012 04:23:55 PM
362 Views
You're not stupid, so I'm going to assume you know why your post is nonsense.
- 26/08/2012 05:37:49 PM
631 Views
he will lose in arbitration, whether or not he is innocent. that's the point
- 28/08/2012 03:55:38 PM
793 Views
Why? And "because Lance says so" isn't a valid argument, neither is "they have too much evidence" 
- 28/08/2012 05:55:24 PM
805 Views
- 28/08/2012 05:55:24 PM
805 Views
a 58-2 record in arbitration suggests something is not quite right, imho
- 29/08/2012 04:02:59 PM
883 Views
Yes - clearly the USADA are far too conservative in their approach and should bring more charges
- 29/08/2012 04:38:34 PM
939 Views
but he was the guy who had cancer
- 26/08/2012 12:26:34 AM
692 Views
I refer you to the Goldman dilema
- 26/08/2012 05:41:26 PM
589 Views
but that's just dumb *NM*
- 26/08/2012 10:23:34 PM
457 Views
I'd guess it is a sign of the drive to win needed to be a top sportsperson
- 26/08/2012 10:51:20 PM
658 Views