Active Users:316 Time:09/04/2025 06:32:21 AM
Well, okay, fair point. Legolas Send a noteboard - 31/07/2012 08:58:04 PM
I suspect it is more a sign of the ignorance of most British sports journalists about cycling.

Also very possible, yes. Speaking of which, Chris Boardman and his co-commentator during that women's race were really painful to listen to at times. Kept repeating the same things over and over and tried to convince people that having a 30 second lead with 30 km to go was somehow a convincing lead that the peloton would never pull back... it did turn out that way, of course, but far larger gaps have been closed over that distance. Even if the small teams did to some extent give an advantage to breakaways.
I guess you've probably seen less interviews with Cavendish after not winning than we see over here - he does hit some serious lows, I doubt there are many sportsmen out there who take so much onto themselves and so obviously feel like they've let people down when they don't win.

I've noticed that before, that he's always talking about his team in all the interviews (which, indeed, I generally only get to see after he's won). Which is only fair, considering that he's not the type of sprinter, like Freire or Zabel in his day, who can win races even without any support. But still, a lot of people in his place would be more arrogant about it, for sure.

He was so much the favourite that it was always going to be really hard... favourites always have a hard time in World or Olympic championships, particularly if they have to do it in the sprint. There's just so much pressure and you need so much luck, either in getting away with the right escape or in having the escape reeled in in time without anyone launching a new one.
It is a real shame he didn't retire when he first said he was going to, cycling really doesn't need people like him hanging around the sport... but I'd not be surprised to see him stay involved with Astana even once he does retire from rider.

I think we can be quite certain of that, yes. Just what cycling needs... not.
Reply to message
What's everyone looking forward to in the Olympics? - 28/07/2012 01:50:18 PM 720 Views
The athletics. - 28/07/2012 05:44:05 PM 509 Views
I believe you. *NM* - 28/07/2012 06:54:07 PM 318 Views
Athletics and women's football *NM* - 28/07/2012 07:18:48 PM 244 Views
Medal count at the conclusion. Mostly the conlusion. *NM* - 28/07/2012 08:04:22 PM 245 Views
Them ending, to be honest - 28/07/2012 10:16:24 PM 517 Views
Same here. I don't care at all about the Olympics. - 30/07/2012 06:35:39 PM 546 Views
Well now. This is horrible. - 30/07/2012 08:16:30 PM 459 Views
Maaaaannnn. - 30/07/2012 08:20:45 PM 534 Views
Ditto - 01/08/2012 05:34:11 AM 591 Views
Well, other than watching Chinese sportspeople smash WRs for fun... - 28/07/2012 11:04:53 PM 506 Views
Yeah - 28/07/2012 11:46:20 PM 560 Views
The big fuss over here doesn't seem to have made much of an impact in the UK? - 30/07/2012 11:23:47 PM 526 Views
No, I don't think any of the mainstream media has picked up on it - 30/07/2012 11:59:27 PM 469 Views
I suppose they don't want to rain on the parade. - 31/07/2012 06:35:49 PM 543 Views
Indeed, the British press would never want to do that - 31/07/2012 07:59:04 PM 652 Views
Well, okay, fair point. - 31/07/2012 08:58:04 PM 582 Views
Re: Well, okay, fair point. - 31/07/2012 10:09:30 PM 637 Views
Also, in one of the lowest points of journalism in olympic history - 31/07/2012 12:06:37 AM 479 Views
I... don't even know how to read that. - 31/07/2012 06:26:56 PM 734 Views
I'm not completely sure either - 31/07/2012 08:02:46 PM 491 Views
Her - 29/07/2012 01:56:39 PM 695 Views
She's not competing as far as I know. - 29/07/2012 02:43:16 PM 576 Views
*NM* - 29/07/2012 02:59:42 PM 227 Views
yeah that was impressive *NM* - 30/07/2012 10:13:07 PM 205 Views
*cat calls* - 31/07/2012 05:20:30 PM 476 Views
Re: *cat calls* - 01/08/2012 12:00:40 AM 472 Views
I like the track and field and the swimming *NM* - 30/07/2012 10:13:36 PM 219 Views
Equestrian sports - 31/07/2012 12:13:33 AM 471 Views

Reply to Message