Active Users:454 Time:04/04/2025 10:14:41 PM
You're really not going to make sense of this if you keep mashing everything together. Legolas Send a noteboard - 27/07/2012 08:59:35 PM
The IOC is one thing. The Greek OC is another thing. They both have their priorities, their history, and their reputation to think about, and based on that they take decisions that may or may not align. This would have been an entirely different story if the IOC - the organization that can actually be blamed for the things you list in that paragraph - had been the one to pronounce the ban. But it wasn't. The Greek OC took this decision - plenty of OCs in other countries wouldn't have, that's for sure, and the IOC's not stupid enough that they'd have done it themselves. No doubt part of the Greek OC's motivation was their view of the Olympic spirit and racism not belonging on the Games; and no doubt another part was simply that they wanted to protect Greece's reputation, which right now is in a dubious state both in general and more specifically in sports (having two of their biggest Athens 2004 heroes stripped of their medals for doping was painful to say the least, and Athens 2004 is rapidly becoming proverbial for how disastrous Olympics can be when you do them wrong).

Sorry but this PC run amok and this young lady should not have all her hard work sacrificed on the altar of false tolerance. The whole “I tolerate anything but intolerance argument is one of the dumbest arguments I have seen intelligent people make.

I actually agree with you, but as long as selection or non-selection is up to the national OCs, I think this decision was inevitable under the circumstances. Which is one of the reasons why I don't think it should be up to the national OCs.
I guess you can make the argument that the Greeks have the right to ban anyone they choose but by the same token I have the right to point out that they are small minded morons how have no tolerance for people who don't toe the line on political opinion. It is a two edged sword you know.

Yes, but if they hadn't banned her they'd have had far more people thinking bad of them.
This message last edited by Legolas on 27/07/2012 at 08:59:54 PM
Reply to message
Am I the only one who thinks Voula Papachristou should not have been kicked out of the Olympics? - 25/07/2012 10:55:19 PM 1287 Views
Being on a country's Olympic team is a privilege, not a right - 25/07/2012 11:00:24 PM 767 Views
So banning blacks would be cool if it was legal in that country? - 25/07/2012 11:08:52 PM 933 Views
If that's how the country wants to run itself - 25/07/2012 11:13:04 PM 805 Views
The IOC can ban nations from participating for that sort of stunt. - 25/07/2012 11:33:23 PM 959 Views
So that excuses thought control? - 25/07/2012 11:49:58 PM 860 Views
If Hitler could let Jesse Owens run... - 25/07/2012 11:07:19 PM 990 Views
Yes. Political power should not be used to enforce morals. - 25/07/2012 11:53:19 PM 734 Views
The national Olympic Committees aren't the government. - 26/07/2012 12:02:43 AM 723 Views
Even worse. - 26/07/2012 12:08:05 AM 766 Views
Erm - 26/07/2012 12:29:32 AM 807 Views
I fail to see how the whole team would be thrown out. - 26/07/2012 12:41:16 AM 800 Views
Because the IOC throws them out if the national government interferes in the national committe. *NM* - 26/07/2012 12:43:39 AM 431 Views
Well, that's absurd. - 26/07/2012 01:09:41 AM 872 Views
As with most things, I doubt the practice matches the theory - 26/07/2012 10:45:55 AM 780 Views
Africans != illegals - 25/07/2012 11:19:32 PM 832 Views
Specious reasoning. - 26/07/2012 12:07:08 AM 698 Views
Who are you to decide that? - 26/07/2012 12:16:45 AM 856 Views
I'm not the one deciding. - 26/07/2012 12:36:17 AM 700 Views
Essentially you're saying "there are lots of racists in Europe". - 26/07/2012 08:28:26 AM 816 Views
That's an oversimplification. - 29/07/2012 03:13:14 AM 768 Views
You stated it as a fact. - 26/07/2012 07:49:58 PM 758 Views
I think any organisation should have the right to choose who represents them - 25/07/2012 11:20:36 PM 777 Views
Well, but that's not the end of it. - 26/07/2012 12:12:09 AM 840 Views
It is for me - 26/07/2012 12:26:25 AM 754 Views
So...conformity ahead? *NM* - 26/07/2012 12:40:03 AM 369 Views
Is that all that happened? - 25/07/2012 11:28:17 PM 712 Views
That and some pro-Golden Dawn statements. - 26/07/2012 12:14:25 AM 901 Views
For me it is more than enough - 26/07/2012 12:32:35 AM 695 Views
It's not what happened to her that I typically waver on. - 27/07/2012 03:08:45 PM 727 Views
It's not a matter of freedom of expression - 26/07/2012 09:49:59 PM 900 Views
This. *NM* - 26/07/2012 10:26:37 PM 390 Views
I oppose censorship even if it is not comng from the government - 26/07/2012 10:16:30 PM 746 Views
How is it censorship? - 27/07/2012 02:33:30 AM 850 Views
try looking up the word censorship and ask yourself would their actions supress speech - 27/07/2012 02:59:11 AM 974 Views
I know the definition thank you. How exactly was her communication suppressed? - 27/07/2012 05:54:39 PM 876 Views
you are right public punishment of political expression could never been seen as suppression - 27/07/2012 06:20:15 PM 996 Views
Well - 27/07/2012 07:20:27 PM 748 Views
Where did she ever imply she wanted them to be bitten? *NM* - 27/07/2012 08:03:05 PM 444 Views
Hello earth.... "food from home". - 27/07/2012 08:26:15 PM 728 Views
OK I repeat my question: Where did she she WANTED them to be bit? - 30/07/2012 09:07:01 PM 1021 Views
Um, she referred to them as food? - 27/07/2012 08:38:22 PM 777 Views
No what is silly is inferring that she hoped they would be bitten *NM* - 30/07/2012 09:09:18 PM 496 Views
No what is silly is inferring that she hoped they would be bitten *NM* - 30/07/2012 09:09:27 PM 406 Views
I'm with you on this - I don't think she wanted them to be bitten. - 27/07/2012 09:02:05 PM 802 Views
It was insensitive at best - 30/07/2012 09:25:06 PM 1255 Views
One problem. - 27/07/2012 04:54:52 AM 756 Views
Exactly - 27/07/2012 12:05:14 PM 760 Views
where do you people get these backasswards idea of what censorship is? PCmart? - 27/07/2012 02:01:29 PM 812 Views
We can have this conversation w/o you being mean. - 27/07/2012 02:57:02 PM 758 Views
I never claimed I was against repercussions and people here are denying it is censorship - 27/07/2012 04:18:54 PM 862 Views
Re: I never claimed I was against repercussions and people here are denying it is censorship - 27/07/2012 05:01:37 PM 772 Views
OK did I miss read what you said? - 27/07/2012 06:41:51 PM 914 Views
No, but the disagreement is important. - 27/07/2012 07:09:11 PM 758 Views
Re: I never claimed I was against repercussions and people here are denying it is censorship - 27/07/2012 06:23:17 PM 702 Views
sorry I forgot the Olympic spirit was about banning athletes for dumb jokes they apologized for - 27/07/2012 08:30:08 PM 685 Views
You're really not going to make sense of this if you keep mashing everything together. - 27/07/2012 08:59:35 PM 720 Views
I know you said it but do you actually believe it? - 27/07/2012 01:56:35 PM 727 Views
It's a good question, but yes, I do. - 27/07/2012 02:42:28 PM 777 Views
Are going to ban everyone and everyone country who says something about anyone else? - 27/07/2012 04:47:51 PM 690 Views
Yes, that is clearly exactly what I said. - 27/07/2012 05:10:37 PM 740 Views
i have a feeling you are being influenced by that pic they run with all the articles about her? - 27/07/2012 02:14:13 PM 752 Views
Surely you don't think... - 27/07/2012 02:57:47 PM 673 Views
Heh. - 27/07/2012 05:53:07 PM 903 Views
Typo? There are limits to our credulity... or to mine, anyway. - 27/07/2012 06:27:44 PM 754 Views
Looks like Voula Papachristou agrees with Tom - 27/07/2012 07:09:30 PM 781 Views
Quite understandable. But so's the Greek OC's decision. - 27/07/2012 07:11:31 PM 784 Views
And now a Swiss footabller has gone as well - 30/07/2012 08:22:45 PM 797 Views
That's just poor sportsmanship. *NM* - 30/07/2012 08:53:53 PM 506 Views
And an Australian athlete has been sent home now - 04/08/2012 10:12:12 AM 625 Views

Reply to Message