Second he neither said nor implied that the people of London would not be able to come together and get it done he simply said that how well they came together would be what made the Olympics successful. Should he have added a “which I don’t doubt for second they will” on the end? Yeah that would have helped. If people read a prediction of failure into they were projecting their own doubts and fears not to mention political prejudice into things. If they were simply offended that he mentioned some of the problems they had then we are back to the thin skinned thing. As for your argument that NY or really anywhere else in America would get bent out of shape because someone said something that if you squint you can find offense in I would say give me an example. America is one of the most heavily and continuous criticized countries in the world and even our friends seem to think it is OK to take shots at the US so where are the examples of public outrage of imagined slights or because someone pointed out the issues we have discussing for weeks? It isn’t like did what some European leaders have done and gave his opinion on an ongoing political race and even when they did that I don’t remember much uproar.
Last month (not coincidentally during university finals time), a Belgian radio presenter did a world record attempt for longest non-stop radio presentation, and since apparently Guinness didn't have that record yet, it was accepted as a world record (it was something like five days or so, I don't remember the number).
Last week, a US radio presenter went and broke the record. When interviewed about it, he mentioned that he'd gotten an anonymous email from Belgium which had motivated him to keep going and get that record if it killed him. The email said, well, let me go look it up exactly, it kind of illustrates several points at the same time... (translated from English to Dutch and back to English, so it may not be 100% accurate)
"Please don't continue with that radio marathon. First off, you Americans can't handle that 187 hours and don't underestimate how strong we Belgians are. I've lived in the US for 14 years and if it taught me one thing it's that you're the laziest people on earth. Just this once, let us Belgians keep the record. You Americans always have to be the best in everything, but know that the rest of the world considers you the biggest and most careless idiots."
Now what can we conclude from that story, and from the fact that my newspaper found it worth putting on its website:
1) Some people are utter idiots
2) Anti-Americanism really is an issue in Europe sometimes
3) With green cards being so hard to get for most people, evidently some imbeciles who really don't deserve them still manage to acquire them, and as someone who actually likes the US and might like living there, I'm annoyed by that
but also
4) People from smaller countries don't have as many things to be proud of, so they're sometimes proud about strange things
5) Some of them get pretty pissed off when said strange things are insulted, minimized or carelessly and effortlessly outdone
6) The press in smaller countries can generally be relied on to follow *everything* involving the country in question or its inhabitants in the foreign press or blogosphere (to the point that whenever something happens in Belgium that's international news, the Belgian newspapers will inevitably start publishing articles about how the news is being reported on foreign media)
7) If it even needs to be pointed out anymore: big countries inevitably get a lot more media attention than small ones, meaning inhabitants of small countries inevitably will know more about big countries, and follow their news more, than the other way around
8 ) And finally, Americans don't exactly like it when their country is insulted, either
Of course, with regard to the issue at hand, I should immediately point out that the UK is not a "smaller country", and so the above isn't nearly as true for them as for Belgium, but in comparison to the US every country counts as a "smaller country", even the small handful that are actually bigger in absolute terms. And of course, the Olympics are a rather bigger deal than a radio marathon record of a month old.
This message last edited by Legolas on 27/07/2012 at 08:44:42 PM
Are the British really that thin skinned?
27/07/2012 03:25:44 PM
- 853 Views
No, just great believers in good manners and courtesy
27/07/2012 04:12:01 PM
- 561 Views
Thats good. I thought maybe they just hated Romney but you have cleared that up *NM*
27/07/2012 04:42:05 PM
- 252 Views
Yeah, the average British person just about knew his name and that he was some politician
28/07/2012 10:00:26 AM
- 434 Views
I still haven't figured out how it was offensive but it apparently was *NM*
27/07/2012 04:43:23 PM
- 224 Views
I think you have to be careful, because you can't see it the way they do.
27/07/2012 05:23:22 PM
- 545 Views
That is why I possed it as a question
27/07/2012 06:12:43 PM
- 498 Views
Yeah sure, we never get upset by stuff like this.
27/07/2012 06:47:59 PM
- 562 Views
Let me tell you a story.
27/07/2012 08:44:16 PM
- 684 Views
It's more likely the press making a big deal out of nothing.
27/07/2012 05:35:20 PM
- 499 Views
That was what it seemed like to me. The "Mr. Leader" thing was sort of funny, though.
27/07/2012 08:16:11 PM
- 530 Views
It's more been a critique on his ability to be a statesman
27/07/2012 06:42:35 PM
- 504 Views
I agree he practiced poor statesmanship
27/07/2012 07:52:17 PM
- 511 Views
Is anything ever as bad as the morning cable guys make it out to be? *NM*
27/07/2012 08:48:32 PM
- 239 Views
The way they were going you would think he had goosed the queen *NM*
27/07/2012 09:40:59 PM
- 223 Views