But I don't think they should be allowed to vote while imprisoned, definitely. If you violate the social contract between you, your society, and the government, you certainly don't get to keep it anyway! Considering some of the ridiculous crimes that can be considered felonies, though, as well as the fact that I have some faith in the redemption of individuals, I think that PERMANENTLY is too far.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
No voter fraud Mr. Holder? I beg to differ.....
- 09/04/2012 07:13:46 PM
659 Views
- 09/04/2012 07:13:46 PM
659 Views
The irony of a Republican-leaning person pointing this out... 
*NM*
- 09/04/2012 08:37:33 PM
152 Views
*NM*
- 09/04/2012 08:37:33 PM
152 Views
Why is it ironic?
- 09/04/2012 09:54:10 PM
410 Views
The irony is merely that of the pot and the kettle
- 10/04/2012 01:05:39 AM
304 Views
If you are referring to FL in 2000.....those machines were bought by Dems.....
- 10/04/2012 01:17:26 AM
294 Views
Was thinking more about Ohio to be honest
- 10/04/2012 01:22:55 AM
304 Views
Intentional Voting Suppression is what they are trying to do in Florida right now(due to a 2011 law)
- 10/04/2012 04:22:25 AM
450 Views
Honestly, I'm fine with convicted felons permanently losing their right to vote.....
- 10/04/2012 04:34:31 AM
285 Views
I am also fine with stupid people not being allowed to vote
- 10/04/2012 04:36:20 AM
248 Views
Agreed - stupid people should not be allowed to vote, maybe an IQ test?
- 10/04/2012 05:17:43 AM
252 Views
I don't know about permanently...
- 10/04/2012 02:10:10 PM
271 Views
Who is talking about letting felons vote in prison?
- 10/04/2012 02:24:29 PM
350 Views
The League of Women Voters, for one
- 10/04/2012 08:50:39 PM
272 Views
Well, that is simply ridiculous then, and merits no consideration.
- 10/04/2012 11:53:04 PM
357 Views
To play Devil's Advocate, there's some legitimacy to the concept
- 11/04/2012 04:24:37 AM
320 Views
Sounds like people deliberately missing the point more than anything.
- 11/04/2012 07:45:40 AM
343 Views
Ohio? When? *NM*
- 10/04/2012 04:30:29 AM
102 Views
2008.
- 10/04/2012 04:37:15 AM
249 Views
Once again, Dems were running those polls and counties.
- 10/04/2012 05:19:14 AM
224 Views
they were not in 2004 and still had vote supression and irregularities
- 10/04/2012 04:44:36 PM
259 Views
I think you've got your facts wrong
- 10/04/2012 09:00:55 PM
268 Views
well, to be fair, it *has* been 8 years 
- 11/04/2012 03:49:17 AM
349 Views
- 11/04/2012 03:49:17 AM
349 Views
Fair Enough, my 'memory' is mostly google based on this anyway, from about a year ago and now
- 11/04/2012 04:00:57 AM
324 Views
Stating something doesn't make it true
- 10/04/2012 04:10:33 AM
318 Views
I'm impressed that you wrote so much in reply
- 10/04/2012 04:36:02 AM
273 Views
Then demonstrate that by having the courtesy to rebut it or withdraw your remarks
- 10/04/2012 06:30:52 AM
328 Views
How long voting takes is a function of machines, not voters.
- 10/04/2012 02:08:39 PM
344 Views
It's a function of various factors, that can certainly be one
- 10/04/2012 08:12:08 PM
293 Views
Ohio in 2004 was hinky enough to prompt the only Congressional challenge since 1876s Corrupt Bargain
- 10/04/2012 11:36:52 PM
415 Views
The fact that it's possible doesn't mean it's widespread, nor that every countermeasure is justified *NM*
- 10/04/2012 11:57:16 AM
119 Views
As long as people need not purchase their voting requirements, voter IDs are fine by me.
- 10/04/2012 12:53:35 PM
355 Views