Active Users:1093 Time:14/11/2024 10:43:16 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
If the divine made men... Urza Send a noteboard - 10/03/2012 06:27:42 AM
Then he crafted our nature and in embracing it, all of it, we exalt him.

If the divine did not make men then we have only our nature and ought find joy in embracing it. All of it.
Reply to message
Atheism: The Iconoclasm of the West? Joel - 10/03/2012 05:42:56 AM 1292 Views
I think about as highly of athiesm as I do of christianity. *NM* Urza - 10/03/2012 05:54:20 AM 356 Views
I would chide you on that basis for having a love/hate relationship with God, but who does not? Joel - 10/03/2012 06:05:11 AM 522 Views
If the divine made men... Urza - 10/03/2012 06:27:42 AM 517 Views
True, but by the same token, in denying our nature we deny the divine. Joel - 10/03/2012 06:57:40 AM 532 Views
I was actually just saying in Skype this is the first post you've made in a long time I've enjoyed. Urza - 10/03/2012 07:02:56 AM 551 Views
Thanks? It is all Dans fault, really. Joel - 10/03/2012 07:21:19 AM 820 Views
But you do comparable things all the time! jh - 10/03/2012 08:35:31 AM 745 Views
You've made this analogy before and it's still a bad one, those aren't comparable Isaac - 10/03/2012 03:43:08 PM 630 Views
You said what I was thinking far more respectfully than I probably would have. Joel - 11/03/2012 12:14:55 AM 597 Views
... and apparently it was a waste of time Isaac - 11/03/2012 03:27:04 AM 537 Views
Perhaps he just missed it in all my spam? Joel - 11/03/2012 04:59:31 AM 609 Views
Basically what Isaac said. *NM* Urza - 10/03/2012 07:22:07 PM 307 Views
who? *NM* jh - 11/03/2012 12:00:13 AM 287 Views
Me Caasi - 11/03/2012 03:31:51 AM 565 Views
You're right and wrong. Dan - 10/03/2012 05:09:32 PM 941 Views
Re: You're right and wrong. Joel - 11/03/2012 12:28:25 AM 848 Views
Nope, Buddhists are explicitly atheist and also explicitly Ontologically engaged Dan - 11/03/2012 01:39:20 AM 850 Views
Actually, Buddhists are not explicitly atheist in the conventional sense of the world. Tom - 11/03/2012 02:42:36 AM 649 Views
Yeah, that's very true. Dan - 11/03/2012 03:27:09 PM 743 Views
My Buddhist readings are definitely Tibet-focused. Tom - 11/03/2012 04:00:17 PM 795 Views
Duplicate post *NM* Dan - 11/03/2012 03:28:58 PM 374 Views
I guess it is that old impersonalism that seems the great disappointment in most Eastern religions. Joel - 11/03/2012 04:48:54 AM 750 Views
What you talkin' 'bout, Willis? *NM* nossy - 10/03/2012 06:29:35 PM 279 Views
I think he's saying that most arguments used on behalf of Atheism actually come from the Bible. Dan - 10/03/2012 06:58:50 PM 638 Views
Pretty much, though I fudged iconoclasms precise definition. Joel - 11/03/2012 12:43:29 AM 581 Views
Basically what Dan said; atheism as iconoclasm sans icons (unless we count religion as symbolism.) Joel - 11/03/2012 12:46:52 AM 653 Views
What exactly do you mean by "The irreparable damage it inflicted in the Great Schism"? Tom - 10/03/2012 07:57:59 PM 721 Views
That Byzantiums iconoclasm was one of the many wedges between it and Rome that led to the Schism. Joel - 11/03/2012 12:27:05 AM 642 Views
Bull. Shit. Tom - 11/03/2012 01:54:07 AM 713 Views
I did not say it was decisive, but that it did irreparable damage to the relationship. Joel - 11/03/2012 04:23:43 AM 730 Views
Bull. Shit. Tom - 11/03/2012 04:30:08 AM 593 Views
It is not like I just pulled it out of my rear, any more than my HS history text or Wikipedia did. Joel - 11/03/2012 04:57:31 AM 672 Views
Bull. Shit. Tom - 11/03/2012 05:14:01 AM 747 Views
Irreparable damage is damage that cannot be repaired, not necessarily serious or fatal. Joel - 11/03/2012 10:34:57 AM 816 Views
Mierda.del.Toro Larry - 11/03/2012 12:36:59 PM 698 Views
1969 may be "sometime back" in Roman Catholic history,but is ~a millenium after the time in question Joel - 12/03/2012 05:47:11 PM 949 Views
You really must get steamed by anyone calling you out on your hyberbolic comments Larry - 12/03/2012 06:55:06 PM 809 Views
On the contrary, I am not the one screaming "bullshit" in as many languages as possible. Joel - 13/03/2012 12:07:54 AM 851 Views
No, you're just the one spewing the bullshit. *NM* Tom - 13/03/2012 12:37:15 AM 265 Views
ο κοπρος. του ταυρου. Tom - 11/03/2012 02:19:11 PM 778 Views
Very edifying; can you do Mandarin or Swahili next? Joel - 12/03/2012 05:47:23 PM 684 Views
No. Even English seems to be beyond your grasp. Tom - 12/03/2012 06:29:50 PM 592 Views
Citing scripture does not justify telling me to kill myself. Joel - 13/03/2012 12:08:02 AM 726 Views
I'm not telling you to; God is. Tom - 13/03/2012 12:35:45 AM 510 Views
Or can only you use that sort of specious logic? *NM* Tom - 13/03/2012 03:50:20 PM 262 Views
And re: particular bullshit Tom - 11/03/2012 02:33:15 PM 701 Views
Re: And re: particular bullshit Joel - 13/03/2012 12:07:42 AM 608 Views
Give it up already. You are wrong. everynametaken - 12/03/2012 12:53:37 AM 897 Views
I will do the former at least; pretty sure this "discussion" has reached rock bottom. Joel - 13/03/2012 12:12:46 AM 540 Views
More or less your last line Cannoli - 11/03/2012 01:37:42 AM 616 Views
That is a broader argument, but more consistent with iconoclasms established meaning. Joel - 11/03/2012 05:12:12 AM 729 Views
Would you include the iconoclasm that Joel cites in the canonical Judeo-Christian tradition as well? Dan - 11/03/2012 12:44:49 PM 596 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes