Active Users:1120 Time:23/12/2024 04:02:42 PM
That seems... unlikely.... Joel Send a noteboard - 08/03/2012 03:03:54 PM
The validity of the complaint matters a great deal to whether we or anyone should credit it; in this case, that means we should not. There is a good argument for Norway using leveling seats and extra seats for specific regions (they do not repeat a re-apportionment nightmare in 50 states each decade) to distribute power and prevent individual tyrants. There is an argument for Britain doing so by essentially making the Speaker of the House also President (though if anything that just unwisely concentrates power.) There is NO argument America should elect the president by direct national popular vote like Britain, because neither it nor any European country of which I am aware does so.

The French elect their president by direct national popular vote - and when the president's party also controls the French parliament, he's a pretty powerful man. (When it doesn't, he's not - their system is interesting that way, in most other countries the respective powers of president and PM, assuming both functions exist, are well-delineated and clear regardless of which party holds which.)

Of course, the French election system does have two rounds (if no candidate gets 50% of the vote in the first round, there's a second round between the two candidates with the most votes), which can backfire spectacularly like in 2002 when the far-right candidate snuck into the second round, the socialist candidate having lost too many votes to the various communist parties (yes, France has multiple communist parties...). Chirac got a record landslide victory in the second round as a result, but it was hardly something to be proud of. In short, not exactly a system anyone would want to imitate. :P

Yet another argument for Instant Runoff Voting (or Preferential Voting, of one prefers.) Personally, I would prefer America institute that and let everyone vote in both primaries, but do not expect either to happen soon.

I'm rather puzzled by your comment about the British Speaker of the House being President... what did you mean by that?

I did qualify that slightly, but I meant the PM is the head of government as well as of the legislature. That makes implementing checks and balances harder.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Now That Romney Is Officially the Republican Presidential Nominee: Pick the President! - 29/02/2012 08:29:02 PM 1261 Views
I have never understood the point of the Electoral College. - 29/02/2012 11:39:11 PM 703 Views
You don't think like a politician then - 01/03/2012 12:38:36 AM 745 Views
I also have not seen most of that mentioned in the popular vs. electoral debate. - 01/03/2012 02:34:31 PM 631 Views
what about one vote one value? - 02/03/2012 11:51:32 PM 715 Views
That has not really changed. - 03/03/2012 03:30:34 AM 899 Views
a bit simplistic and unrealistic - 02/03/2012 11:44:02 PM 672 Views
When illustrating a point realism is not required and simplicity is a plus - 03/03/2012 03:04:26 AM 689 Views
I have a couple quibbles. - 03/03/2012 05:23:46 AM 717 Views
Oh, certainly, I'm over-generalizing but I was already getting long-winded - 03/03/2012 06:52:04 AM 677 Views
I hate when people do that. - 05/03/2012 09:49:36 AM 659 Views
What a bunch of waffle! - 03/03/2012 10:47:19 AM 821 Views
First you complain of simplicity then of my lack of brevity? - 03/03/2012 11:18:11 AM 607 Views
A simplistic argument doesn't mean it's brief *NM* - 03/03/2012 09:55:51 PM 337 Views
Also I don't like this refrain that implies only the POTUS vote matters - 03/03/2012 03:29:58 AM 833 Views
IMHO, parliaments choosing prime ministers is LESS democratic than the electoral college. - 03/03/2012 05:57:41 AM 633 Views
Re: IMHO, parliaments choosing prime ministers is LESS democratic than the electoral college. - 03/03/2012 07:02:30 AM 671 Views
*is learning* - 04/03/2012 09:49:42 PM 662 Views
Re: *is learning* - 04/03/2012 09:56:16 PM 676 Views
To the extent I can (yet again) claim to speak for Europeans... - 04/03/2012 10:33:01 PM 652 Views
I've fairly limited exposure and that from some years back - 04/03/2012 11:35:12 PM 713 Views
Re: *is learning* - 05/03/2012 12:08:08 AM 716 Views
You could imitate the French. - 07/03/2012 10:40:16 PM 650 Views
That seems... unlikely.... - 08/03/2012 03:03:54 PM 651 Views
I don't know much about Norwegian politics, but you seem to be wrong. - 03/03/2012 06:18:08 PM 690 Views
Do you happen to have that link, please? - 03/03/2012 06:46:31 PM 566 Views
Sure. - 03/03/2012 06:58:07 PM 740 Views
Guess we did not read far enough. - 03/03/2012 10:38:07 PM 683 Views
Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics... - 03/03/2012 11:49:44 PM 887 Views
Re: Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics... - 05/03/2012 06:56:24 AM 684 Views
Fascinating. - 05/03/2012 10:52:32 PM 669 Views
Re: Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics... - 08/03/2012 07:11:12 PM 635 Views
Many valid reasons, including those Isaac cited. - 02/03/2012 02:26:37 AM 785 Views
Most states are ignored anyway - 02/03/2012 11:56:12 PM 861 Views
Why would we do something logical? Dude, you're utterly ridiculous. *NM* - 05/03/2012 04:53:38 PM 373 Views
I'm kind of sad- does this mean Santorum won't be providing wonderful sound bites anymore? - 01/03/2012 02:22:31 PM 625 Views
Nothing has shut him up yet, why should this? *NM* - 01/03/2012 05:27:30 PM 356 Views
Maybe he'll pull a Palin and go touring around the country *NM* - 01/03/2012 07:06:02 PM 324 Views
No, it probably means we will get more and worse than ever. - 01/03/2012 11:25:25 PM 804 Views
Romney or Obama, either way, America loses. *NM* - 02/03/2012 01:10:26 AM 449 Views
Hard to dispute that either; six of one, half a dozen of the other. - 02/03/2012 01:38:07 AM 606 Views
Couldn't agree more *NM* - 02/03/2012 06:52:51 PM 364 Views
It reminds me of when Denver backed into the NFL playoffs. - 02/03/2012 09:36:13 PM 600 Views
I'd agree hope and change was extremely unrealistic - 02/03/2012 11:58:57 PM 604 Views
Romney is damaged - 02/03/2012 11:27:33 PM 619 Views
Obama is rather damaged also; it will probably come down to FL and OH, yet again. - 03/03/2012 02:23:53 AM 725 Views
I'm hoping for Rubio as VP... then FL probably won't matter - 03/03/2012 04:28:08 AM 606 Views
You should put that on your license plates. - 03/03/2012 06:41:34 AM 729 Views
Re: You should put that on your license plates. - 03/03/2012 06:51:00 AM 677 Views
Ax murderers are people, too! - 04/03/2012 08:23:41 PM 629 Views
And what are you basing all of this on? - 03/03/2012 09:54:06 PM 719 Views
The closeness of several states when Obama was far more popular, and UTs heavily Mormon neighbors. - 03/03/2012 11:44:06 PM 674 Views
Wrong - 04/03/2012 08:08:56 AM 791 Views
Higher turnout magnifies the Mormon effect. - 04/03/2012 08:08:09 PM 830 Views
Your reasoning is flawed and if you can't see it there is no hope for you - 05/03/2012 11:39:04 PM 735 Views
Yeah, I think we had that conversation already, several times, in fact. - 07/03/2012 05:36:45 AM 572 Views
Do you have any knowledge of statistics at all? - 07/03/2012 09:04:15 PM 735 Views
I hate this message board - 07/03/2012 09:06:30 PM 530 Views
Some, though it is far from exhaustive. - 08/03/2012 02:29:06 PM 712 Views

Reply to Message