Re: Hey, man, I am an AMERICAN: I do not HAVE to know ANYTHING!
Legolas Send a noteboard - 05/03/2012 11:14:42 PM

It is actively discouraged in much of the country, and some consider it grounds for revoking citizenship. 

I noticed.

Yeah, I remember you mentioning that, but I was thinking in terms of the varying degree to which the royal prerogative is restricted, and how much its remaining extent is real vs. nominal. From what I recall reading, Gladstone was once unable to resume the office of PM simply because Queen Victoria detested him, so even as late as the Nineteenth Century Britains PM very much required the monarchs approval. As I understand things, the outgoing Norwegian PM recommends a replacement for the king to appoint, but whether rejecting that replacement would mean a constitutional crisis orsimply nominating another I can only guess. It is kind of bizarre to think of the king as the only citizen with NO franchise.
Yeah, those were different days... but they are well behind us. Like I said, I don't know much about Norwegian politics but I strongly doubt Haakon has the power to reject a PM who has the support of a majority in parliament.
Well, extreme positions are typically unwise, especially in politics. Your point on stability and multi-party viability is well taken (Isaac also referenced that in defence of Americas system, as you probably noticed.)
I don't really know that that's the kind of thing your maxim about extremes applies to... and Dom did a pretty good job there of undermining my entire point by making Canada sound even worse than Israel and the Netherlands in terms of stability. Or as bad, anyway. Still, in most cases the rule applies. I'm not sure there's any single democracy system that is really superior to the others - it depends on your country to begin with, and they've all had their good and bad days.
America does have a history of pivotal exceptions to the rule that regional single member districts deter multi-party states though. In the years just prior to the Civil War, regional differences over slaverys expansion fatally split the Democratic Party that had enjoyed single party national rule a generation earlier, and that dynamic resurfaced a century later when Strom Thurmond and, later, George Wallace carried several states as Dixiecrats. Progressive Republicans under TR and then Robert La Follette (both of whom wore the "Happy Warrior" moniker in succession) similarly undermined that party in the early Twentieth Century, and the combined appeals of both threatened Trumans 1948 election as much as the Republican nominee Thomas Dewey did. And, of course, without the Greens Gore would have easily won NH as well as FL, making either state an acceptable loss by itself (which would have been historic in that a president would have been elected despite losing 2/3 in FL, PA and OH.) Establishing strong regional bases from which to build national support—and recruit experienced candidates—is still the only viable option for American third parties. Failure to do that in the West, South and Midwest is probably what doomed the Reform Party whose spoiler effect was indispensable to Clintons election.
I'm well aware, but as you point out yourself, those exceptions all fit one or both of the categories of exceptions predicted in the model: brief-lived third parties, and regional third parties. The US is probably the strongest two-party duopoly in world politics - after all, the UK does have a serious nation-wide third party that has been around ever since the days when it was the second or indeed first party, and as for Canada, well, see Dom's smackdown of my post.

I see; that is definitely a big feature I was completely unaware of in the European right. I guess it makes sense; many Republicans have for decades sneered at the hypocrisy of the Democratic Party trumpeting its civil rights accomplishments despite slavish devotion to unions in many places saturated with open racism and sexism. The big difference is that an economically liberal right IS almost totally foreign to my experience. The closest America has ever come to that was Father Coughlins public populism and clandestine support for Hitler. His contemporary, Huey Long, is probably most associated with "American fascism," but, being elected governor and then senator in the Deep South despite railing against poll taxes and other racial inequality, he mainly illustrates the American rights confusion over the differences between communism and socialism vs. fascism.
I would think it's an important thing to be aware of, even for an American, at least if that American is going to be facing "Hitler was a leftie" arguments on a regular basis.
The relation between the American right and the European far-right is interesting to follow, sometimes - the way the European far-right leaders are sometimes embraced in America and sometimes spat out, depending on the subject and the circumstances. Mostly they are ignored, though, which is probably for the best.
I tend to, but should not, take for granted that supporting social programs that benefit urban and labor constituents precludes racist agendas. With the notable exception of Jews, multiculturalism strikes me as a more novel issue for Europe than in America, and the welfare state far less so. Partisan reflections of that are natural.
Definitely so - large-scale multiculturalism in its current sense, in many though not all European countries, dates back only to the sixties, exactly when the American civil rights movement was breaking down (institutional) racism in the US.
And no, you definitely should not take that for granted.
Seven seems like a good number to me; five would probably be ideal, but any multipartisan environment favors the development of one or two niche parties catering to regional or other narrow interests. They are not terribly counterproductive if they align almost entirely with one of the broad major parties on all other issues. More importantly, they ensure issues vital but specific to key demographics receive recognition both directly, through their party, and indirectly, through the influence its kingmaking ability has on coalitions.
Fair enough. Belgium would only really have five or six if not for that little detail of having two of each political stripe what with the language thing. Much as I hate to say anything that might make Belgium sound like an example of good politics...

Now That Romney Is Officially the Republican Presidential Nominee: Pick the President!
29/02/2012 08:29:02 PM
- 1330 Views

I agree Romney will be the candidate.
29/02/2012 08:54:52 PM
- 715 Views
I would say the math favors Romney over Obama, but it will probably be close either way.
01/03/2012 03:37:52 PM
- 764 Views
I have never understood the point of the Electoral College.
29/02/2012 11:39:11 PM
- 759 Views
You don't think like a politician then
01/03/2012 12:38:36 AM
- 813 Views

I certainly hadn't considered much of that. I'm glad you posted it. *NM*
01/03/2012 07:15:03 AM
- 338 Views
I also have not seen most of that mentioned in the popular vs. electoral debate.
01/03/2012 02:34:31 PM
- 687 Views
a bit simplistic and unrealistic
02/03/2012 11:44:02 PM
- 740 Views
When illustrating a point realism is not required and simplicity is a plus
03/03/2012 03:04:26 AM
- 760 Views
I have a couple quibbles.
03/03/2012 05:23:46 AM
- 789 Views
Oh, certainly, I'm over-generalizing but I was already getting long-winded
03/03/2012 06:52:04 AM
- 729 Views
What a bunch of waffle!
03/03/2012 10:47:19 AM
- 881 Views
Also I don't like this refrain that implies only the POTUS vote matters
03/03/2012 03:29:58 AM
- 894 Views
IMHO, parliaments choosing prime ministers is LESS democratic than the electoral college.
03/03/2012 05:57:41 AM
- 696 Views
Re: IMHO, parliaments choosing prime ministers is LESS democratic than the electoral college.
03/03/2012 07:02:30 AM
- 729 Views
*is learning*
04/03/2012 09:49:42 PM
- 728 Views
Re: *is learning*
04/03/2012 09:56:16 PM
- 752 Views
Re: *is learning*
05/03/2012 12:08:08 AM
- 779 Views
You could imitate the French.
07/03/2012 10:40:16 PM
- 717 Views

That seems... unlikely....
08/03/2012 03:03:54 PM
- 719 Views

It does, doesn't it?
08/03/2012 06:11:08 PM
- 908 Views

After I thought about it more, I realized France and the US are not so different in that respect.
08/03/2012 08:51:03 PM
- 680 Views
More similar than the other major Western democracies at least, agreed.
08/03/2012 09:32:55 PM
- 668 Views
I did not realize lack of a parliamentary majority dictated his cabinet.
09/03/2012 12:27:31 AM
- 745 Views
I don't know much about Norwegian politics, but you seem to be wrong.
03/03/2012 06:18:08 PM
- 763 Views
Do you happen to have that link, please?
03/03/2012 06:46:31 PM
- 621 Views
Sure.
03/03/2012 06:58:07 PM
- 798 Views
Guess we did not read far enough.
03/03/2012 10:38:07 PM
- 744 Views
Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics...
03/03/2012 11:49:44 PM
- 948 Views
Hey, man, I am an AMERICAN: I do not HAVE to know ANYTHING!
04/03/2012 11:46:57 PM
- 956 Views

Re: Hey, man, I am an AMERICAN: I do not HAVE to know ANYTHING!
05/03/2012 11:14:42 PM
- 1297 Views

Re: Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics...
05/03/2012 06:56:24 AM
- 744 Views
The thing is, regions often have national relevance far greater than their populations would suggest
05/03/2012 10:21:26 AM
- 690 Views
Re: Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics...
08/03/2012 07:11:12 PM
- 691 Views
Many valid reasons, including those Isaac cited.
02/03/2012 02:26:37 AM
- 850 Views
Most states are ignored anyway
02/03/2012 11:56:12 PM
- 917 Views
Only because and to the extent they have already committed themselves.
03/03/2012 03:41:39 AM
- 768 Views
Why would we do something logical? Dude, you're utterly ridiculous. *NM*
05/03/2012 04:53:38 PM
- 397 Views
I'm kind of sad- does this mean Santorum won't be providing wonderful sound bites anymore?
01/03/2012 02:22:31 PM
- 690 Views
Romney or Obama, either way, America loses. *NM*
02/03/2012 01:10:26 AM
- 476 Views
Hard to dispute that either; six of one, half a dozen of the other.
02/03/2012 01:38:07 AM
- 665 Views
I'd agree hope and change was extremely unrealistic
02/03/2012 11:58:57 PM
- 664 Views
Well, you know my story there; I voted for Obama and got Hillary (at best.)
03/03/2012 01:43:20 AM
- 685 Views
Update: Despite rules requiring they be split, the MI GOP is giving Romney BOTH statewide delegates.
02/03/2012 11:10:56 PM
- 765 Views
Romney is damaged
02/03/2012 11:27:33 PM
- 675 Views
Obama is rather damaged also; it will probably come down to FL and OH, yet again.
03/03/2012 02:23:53 AM
- 796 Views
I'm hoping for Rubio as VP... then FL probably won't matter
03/03/2012 04:28:08 AM
- 658 Views
You should put that on your license plates.
03/03/2012 06:41:34 AM
- 786 Views

And what are you basing all of this on?
03/03/2012 09:54:06 PM
- 784 Views
The closeness of several states when Obama was far more popular, and UTs heavily Mormon neighbors.
03/03/2012 11:44:06 PM
- 738 Views
Wrong
04/03/2012 08:08:56 AM
- 856 Views
Higher turnout magnifies the Mormon effect.
04/03/2012 08:08:09 PM
- 900 Views
Your reasoning is flawed and if you can't see it there is no hope for you
05/03/2012 11:39:04 PM
- 811 Views
Yeah, I think we had that conversation already, several times, in fact.
07/03/2012 05:36:45 AM
- 647 Views
Do you have any knowledge of statistics at all?
07/03/2012 09:04:15 PM
- 810 Views
I hate this message board
07/03/2012 09:06:30 PM
- 587 Views
It would probably help if you deleted the stuff from two, three posts back?
07/03/2012 09:25:40 PM
- 707 Views