Update: Despite rules requiring they be split, the MI GOP is giving Romney BOTH statewide delegates.
Joel Send a noteboard - 02/03/2012 11:10:56 PM
To clarify for still confused Tea Partiers: Sit down and shut up; GOP leaders nominated Romney before Thanksgiving of 2008, and your only role is to dutifully vote for him THIS November. For Ron Paul supporters: I think the private insurance Robamacare requires you buy covers lithium and thorazine....
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 02/03/2012 at 11:12:00 PM
Now That Romney Is Officially the Republican Presidential Nominee: Pick the President!
29/02/2012 08:29:02 PM
- 1281 Views
I agree Romney will be the candidate.
29/02/2012 08:54:52 PM
- 672 Views
I would say the math favors Romney over Obama, but it will probably be close either way.
01/03/2012 03:37:52 PM
- 722 Views
I have never understood the point of the Electoral College.
29/02/2012 11:39:11 PM
- 720 Views
You don't think like a politician then
01/03/2012 12:38:36 AM
- 764 Views
I certainly hadn't considered much of that. I'm glad you posted it. *NM*
01/03/2012 07:15:03 AM
- 321 Views
I also have not seen most of that mentioned in the popular vs. electoral debate.
01/03/2012 02:34:31 PM
- 648 Views
a bit simplistic and unrealistic
02/03/2012 11:44:02 PM
- 693 Views
When illustrating a point realism is not required and simplicity is a plus
03/03/2012 03:04:26 AM
- 704 Views
I have a couple quibbles.
03/03/2012 05:23:46 AM
- 744 Views
Oh, certainly, I'm over-generalizing but I was already getting long-winded
03/03/2012 06:52:04 AM
- 691 Views
What a bunch of waffle!
03/03/2012 10:47:19 AM
- 844 Views
Also I don't like this refrain that implies only the POTUS vote matters
03/03/2012 03:29:58 AM
- 856 Views
IMHO, parliaments choosing prime ministers is LESS democratic than the electoral college.
03/03/2012 05:57:41 AM
- 651 Views
Re: IMHO, parliaments choosing prime ministers is LESS democratic than the electoral college.
03/03/2012 07:02:30 AM
- 691 Views
*is learning*
04/03/2012 09:49:42 PM
- 674 Views
Re: *is learning*
04/03/2012 09:56:16 PM
- 695 Views
Re: *is learning*
05/03/2012 12:08:08 AM
- 741 Views
You could imitate the French.
07/03/2012 10:40:16 PM
- 671 Views
That seems... unlikely....
08/03/2012 03:03:54 PM
- 678 Views
It does, doesn't it?
08/03/2012 06:11:08 PM
- 868 Views
After I thought about it more, I realized France and the US are not so different in that respect.
08/03/2012 08:51:03 PM
- 644 Views
More similar than the other major Western democracies at least, agreed.
08/03/2012 09:32:55 PM
- 627 Views
I did not realize lack of a parliamentary majority dictated his cabinet.
09/03/2012 12:27:31 AM
- 697 Views
I don't know much about Norwegian politics, but you seem to be wrong.
03/03/2012 06:18:08 PM
- 710 Views
Do you happen to have that link, please?
03/03/2012 06:46:31 PM
- 584 Views
Sure.
03/03/2012 06:58:07 PM
- 759 Views
Guess we did not read far enough.
03/03/2012 10:38:07 PM
- 701 Views
Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics...
03/03/2012 11:49:44 PM
- 905 Views
Hey, man, I am an AMERICAN: I do not HAVE to know ANYTHING!
04/03/2012 11:46:57 PM
- 920 Views
Re: Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics...
05/03/2012 06:56:24 AM
- 704 Views
The thing is, regions often have national relevance far greater than their populations would suggest
05/03/2012 10:21:26 AM
- 659 Views
Re: Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics...
08/03/2012 07:11:12 PM
- 654 Views
Many valid reasons, including those Isaac cited.
02/03/2012 02:26:37 AM
- 806 Views
Most states are ignored anyway
02/03/2012 11:56:12 PM
- 880 Views
Only because and to the extent they have already committed themselves.
03/03/2012 03:41:39 AM
- 728 Views
Why would we do something logical? Dude, you're utterly ridiculous. *NM*
05/03/2012 04:53:38 PM
- 378 Views
I'm kind of sad- does this mean Santorum won't be providing wonderful sound bites anymore?
01/03/2012 02:22:31 PM
- 645 Views
Romney or Obama, either way, America loses. *NM*
02/03/2012 01:10:26 AM
- 458 Views
Hard to dispute that either; six of one, half a dozen of the other.
02/03/2012 01:38:07 AM
- 624 Views
I'd agree hope and change was extremely unrealistic
02/03/2012 11:58:57 PM
- 622 Views
Well, you know my story there; I voted for Obama and got Hillary (at best.)
03/03/2012 01:43:20 AM
- 639 Views
Update: Despite rules requiring they be split, the MI GOP is giving Romney BOTH statewide delegates.
02/03/2012 11:10:56 PM
- 722 Views
Romney is damaged
02/03/2012 11:27:33 PM
- 639 Views
Obama is rather damaged also; it will probably come down to FL and OH, yet again.
03/03/2012 02:23:53 AM
- 750 Views
I'm hoping for Rubio as VP... then FL probably won't matter
03/03/2012 04:28:08 AM
- 620 Views
You should put that on your license plates.
03/03/2012 06:41:34 AM
- 744 Views
And what are you basing all of this on?
03/03/2012 09:54:06 PM
- 741 Views
The closeness of several states when Obama was far more popular, and UTs heavily Mormon neighbors.
03/03/2012 11:44:06 PM
- 693 Views
Wrong
04/03/2012 08:08:56 AM
- 812 Views
Higher turnout magnifies the Mormon effect.
04/03/2012 08:08:09 PM
- 856 Views
Your reasoning is flawed and if you can't see it there is no hope for you
05/03/2012 11:39:04 PM
- 758 Views
Yeah, I think we had that conversation already, several times, in fact.
07/03/2012 05:36:45 AM
- 592 Views
Do you have any knowledge of statistics at all?
07/03/2012 09:04:15 PM
- 752 Views
I hate this message board
07/03/2012 09:06:30 PM
- 544 Views
It would probably help if you deleted the stuff from two, three posts back?
07/03/2012 09:25:40 PM
- 665 Views