Active Users:1046 Time:22/11/2024 05:15:26 PM
I meant that the act of choosing for someone else nossy Send a noteboard - 29/02/2012 08:54:02 PM
seems really rude and condescending to me. Not that there can be no love involved. I realize the two seem mutually exclusive, but I don't think they are.

As for your subject line, it took me a second to sort out what you meant by that . You can term it how you like. You have phrased it to more strongly bring out the negative implication of someone having been wrong. That is the lens you choose to view it through.

We obviously will have to agree to disagree. I don't love that you question the motives I stated, but then we don't know each other at all so I can't blame you. And I all but stated that I thought you were probably trying to be offended in order to find it really effing rude. So that wasn't fair of me either.

And I'm sorry that my viewpoint is uncomfortable for you. I suppose it has to be, in a disagreement. As I said above, I don't think there is no love involved (pure motive), but I do think it's not your place to make that choice. I appreciate the nice comments, and I apologize if I wasn't careful enough with my statements. I'm sure I could have been nicer about all of it.

As for the zingy quote, it is one of my favorites and I like to remind myself to not get offended when no offense is intended. It probably just sounded condescending quoting it to you. I apologize about that.

It is important to really weigh whether a situation is offensive, but I don't think we can always avoid being offended, or that we should try to. Some things are wrong, and feeling or causing "offense" is what makes us think about our choices. If we believe them firmly enough, we may still wish to do them, regardless.
Reply to message
Do you know the best way to anger an atheist? - 28/02/2012 07:10:57 PM 1856 Views
Or, you could baptize one of them, posthumously. - 28/02/2012 07:32:48 PM 1187 Views
Ooo that is hilarious *NM* - 28/02/2012 08:22:19 PM 428 Views
I can't think of any reason for an atheist to be annoyed by that. - 28/02/2012 11:08:44 PM 945 Views
Well, for starters, it's really effing rude. - 28/02/2012 11:31:36 PM 983 Views
It is an act of love. - 29/02/2012 12:34:03 AM 1008 Views
Everyone does it for that reason? (edits for clarity) - 29/02/2012 10:27:02 AM 897 Views
I have some disturbing news for you... - 29/02/2012 06:42:41 PM 945 Views
For anyone reading this: the guy above is wrong, and I am admitting that to you on his behalf, so - 29/02/2012 07:15:38 PM 955 Views
Maybe without realizing it, you have articulated.... - 29/02/2012 07:24:13 PM 810 Views
I actually find that conversation quite interesting. - 29/02/2012 08:18:35 PM 933 Views
Re: I actually find that conversation quite interesting. - 29/02/2012 09:07:06 PM 956 Views
I cannot possibly agree more with these two paragraphs of yours... - 29/02/2012 09:28:09 PM 967 Views
I'm surprised to see some of this. - 01/03/2012 12:11:31 PM 823 Views
You said it was really effing rude. - 29/02/2012 08:18:40 PM 992 Views
I meant that the act of choosing for someone else - 29/02/2012 08:54:02 PM 883 Views
Question - 29/02/2012 07:58:32 PM 995 Views
No, I don't blame them or think they are fools. - 29/02/2012 08:41:13 PM 909 Views
It is not an act of love to defy the beliefs of a loved one. - 29/02/2012 02:32:45 PM 1053 Views
Rape? That is ridiculous. - 29/02/2012 05:26:13 PM 957 Views
It's a bit of hyperbole, but not too far from it, imo - 29/02/2012 05:45:39 PM 988 Views
You are trying your best to not understand. - 29/02/2012 07:12:57 PM 975 Views
I suspect that that is where a lot of the issue with it lies. - 02/03/2012 01:33:43 AM 1027 Views
one thing - 29/02/2012 06:25:45 PM 996 Views
Precisely *NM* - 29/02/2012 06:59:15 PM 473 Views
Bad example - 05/03/2012 05:06:21 AM 1045 Views
Why would they be angry about that? - 02/03/2012 01:23:56 AM 1113 Views
Denying people rights since it was written 3000 years ago? - 28/02/2012 07:44:02 PM 908 Views
Isn't religion different than faith, though? - 28/02/2012 07:44:07 PM 1012 Views
Yeah that's pretty much what I said - 28/02/2012 08:21:56 PM 802 Views
Only if I get to be Pope. - 28/02/2012 08:25:45 PM 916 Views
I love me my vices! Thanks Pope - 28/02/2012 10:14:27 PM 786 Views
Generally the same way you piss off anyone else - 28/02/2012 08:43:04 PM 929 Views
Great post. - 28/02/2012 09:18:38 PM 911 Views
I find that the best way is to smile. - 29/02/2012 06:23:50 AM 932 Views
Some answers - 28/02/2012 09:05:35 PM 879 Views
that won't work on Buddists - 28/02/2012 09:21:48 PM 951 Views
On the other hand ... - 28/02/2012 09:28:27 PM 790 Views
For some reason I always imagine Buddhists as the monk class on RPG games... *NM* - 28/02/2012 10:13:27 PM 472 Views
LOL same *NM* - 28/02/2012 10:31:38 PM 450 Views
Best way to anger an atheist, by declaring all atheists are the same. *NM* - 28/02/2012 10:38:51 PM 615 Views
Telling anyone what they actually believe will work. *NM* - 28/02/2012 10:51:56 PM 442 Views
This kind of works for many, doesn't it? - 29/02/2012 06:22:33 PM 812 Views
I'm an atheist, and I consider it to be my religion. *NM* - 28/02/2012 10:51:00 PM 425 Views
Common error number 1: "Atheism isn't a lack of belief, but rather a belief that God doesn't exist." - 28/02/2012 11:18:23 PM 1096 Views
I second that - 29/02/2012 03:46:15 AM 913 Views
Curiously, anger at statements of simple obvious facts is a hallmark of religious fundamentalism. - 29/02/2012 10:27:29 AM 1036 Views
What you're doing there is defining "atheist" and "agnostic" in a way that suits you, but... - 29/02/2012 11:50:27 AM 834 Views
What I am doing is using the terms as they were universally used until about the time I was born. - 05/03/2012 01:11:21 AM 971 Views
So what do you call this position?: - 05/03/2012 08:43:20 AM 927 Views
I call them both agnostic, but the former leans toward atheism while the latter has no lean. - 05/03/2012 10:53:02 AM 981 Views
See, there you go again, defining atheism in such a way as to make it sound ridiculous. - 05/03/2012 11:21:17 AM 805 Views
Well, is unswerving belief a good thing, or not? - 05/03/2012 11:57:05 AM 1032 Views
What's happening - 05/03/2012 02:24:41 PM 1014 Views
Conversationally, DKs use of "atheism" at the start of this convo is the only practical definition. - 07/03/2012 03:10:18 AM 1321 Views
Oh really? The guy who was doing it to annoy people? - 07/03/2012 09:53:38 PM 919 Views
The guy who was doing it to annoy atheists based on the terms technical and popular meaning, yes. - 11/03/2012 04:04:36 AM 794 Views
Whatever. - 12/03/2012 12:39:24 AM 1235 Views
*NM* - 12/03/2012 01:14:39 AM 447 Views
I understand that as "I completely agree." - 13/03/2012 12:11:18 AM 1073 Views
I saw it as.... - 13/03/2012 10:44:37 PM 829 Views
My browser does not like your gif. - 13/03/2012 11:32:06 PM 1084 Views
I have a few good quotes for this one. - 29/02/2012 03:29:22 PM 928 Views
I snerfled. *NM* - 29/02/2012 05:12:32 PM 462 Views
Re: That's it? *NM* - 01/03/2012 06:33:48 AM 519 Views
Re: Do you know the best way to anger an atheist? - 02/03/2012 01:47:03 AM 863 Views

Reply to Message