Are we saying moderate is being The Negotiator between the sides of an issue, considering all sides and being all Buddhah-like about it?
Or Are we saying that being a moderate is just being towards the middle on the spectrum of opinion about an issue? Like, for example, instead of being Abortions are Evil or Banning Abortion is Evil, one thinks that abortion is okay in some circumstances, but shouldn't be used as "accident management" and so limitations should be placed on it. I'd say that's a more moderate viewpoint on the subject. Some people can be very passionate about a middle-spectrum opinion (ask me about food animal issues some time )
Of course part of the problem with the term "moderate" is that you're trying to give an entire spectrum one definitive word. When one thinks of "liberal" or "conservative" (right or wrong), one imagines a particular polarized portrayal to then build from. There isn't really such a thing for moderates (that I can think of). I'd have to think that either of the two scenarios above would be the closest thing to it, but it's still so open-ended about specific opinions on issues that it's hard to define.
And, of course, humanity does like to put things in boxes which explains why people love to polarize...
Or Are we saying that being a moderate is just being towards the middle on the spectrum of opinion about an issue? Like, for example, instead of being Abortions are Evil or Banning Abortion is Evil, one thinks that abortion is okay in some circumstances, but shouldn't be used as "accident management" and so limitations should be placed on it. I'd say that's a more moderate viewpoint on the subject. Some people can be very passionate about a middle-spectrum opinion (ask me about food animal issues some time )
Of course part of the problem with the term "moderate" is that you're trying to give an entire spectrum one definitive word. When one thinks of "liberal" or "conservative" (right or wrong), one imagines a particular polarized portrayal to then build from. There isn't really such a thing for moderates (that I can think of). I'd have to think that either of the two scenarios above would be the closest thing to it, but it's still so open-ended about specific opinions on issues that it's hard to define.
And, of course, humanity does like to put things in boxes which explains why people love to polarize...
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
In an attempt to obtain well-rounded news coverage, I bought 2 magazines.
17/02/2012 01:25:30 AM
- 774 Views
Why?
17/02/2012 01:27:19 AM
- 501 Views
Actually, I'm just looking for another kind of meeting. *NM*
17/02/2012 01:29:10 AM
- 230 Views
Moderates don't normally have meetings or publications
17/02/2012 03:01:58 AM
- 521 Views
well what are we calling moderate here
17/02/2012 04:02:18 AM
- 466 Views
That's a very eye of the beholder sort of thing
18/02/2012 07:38:09 AM
- 468 Views
Re: In an attempt to obtain well-rounded news coverage, I bought 2 magazines.
17/02/2012 12:51:14 PM
- 570 Views
Re: In an attempt to obtain well-rounded news coverage, I bought 2 magazines.
17/02/2012 02:04:05 PM
- 435 Views
The Economist. *NM*
17/02/2012 02:45:56 PM
- 212 Views
Seconded. There are other good ones, but it's hard to beat that one. *NM*
17/02/2012 07:53:25 PM
- 220 Views
As others have said, The Economist is centrist. If you want a better sampling of conlib...
17/02/2012 08:29:09 PM
- 536 Views
Anyone who is not a die hard should STFU.
17/02/2012 08:31:19 PM
- 602 Views