The man talked about during the campaign was the one elected with a mandate.
Joel Send a noteboard - 12/02/2012 02:28:15 AM
Pretty much he has done accounting math to obtain everything he wanted but get rid of the complaints.
but I do think he's accomplishing what he meant to, which is important for me. The polls aren't killing him because this is what many women (and I have to assume men?) secretly want - it infuriates me that many of them won't say this in front of their peers for fear of judgement, but it still shows that there is a silent majority in favor of affordable contraception. (I point this out as someone who has recently been discussing tooooooo much with several different types of female friends/family members. I can't say it makes me completely correct, but the comments certainly seem to support me.)
Joel, I love you, but I can no longer read your "Obama bomb" posts, so I have no idea what other discussion is happening here, and will be leaving now. You sound like triscuit. Ugh.
I cannot really blame you. I am just frustrated, disillusioned and bitter over Obama turning out to be yet another Republican Lite Democrat and what those policies are doing to the nation and world. This is not a win for womens health. That depends on insurers agreeing to offer free contraceptive coverage because 1) It makes economic sense (they would already give free coverage if it were that simple) and 2) they want in on insurance exchanges that will not exist until two years from now.
Do not hold your breath. But Obama can yet again tell progressives he delivered for us even though he actually abandoned us, and the torch-wielding villagers sick of puritanical robber barons will go out and vote for him again because "he fights for us." No one fights for us; America is every man for himself now.
It seems to me that you're too far to the left to view it clearly - America is simply NOT that progressive yet, and Obama is going back to pretty much where he has to be. I won't claim that he's been some sort of genius, but he IS essentially what I expected - "republican lite" is a cute term you like to use, but I think we're just learning what happens when one side tries to work in compromises and everyone is used to ultimatums, so it doesn't work (or appears not to).
Every time I read one of your posts that touches on this, I get the feeling that you're convinced he should be the man everyone talked about in the campaign. We all knew that couldn't happen. Govt doesn't work like that. So anyway, I don't want to sit here and tell you I think you're wrong, so I should probably just shut up and let you keep on.
Working class Americans do not really care about left/right or socialist/capitalist. They care about esoteric ideals like jobs, housing, personal savings/debt and medical care. It just so happens the left historically does a better job on those issues, though some debate that.
What is undebateable is that Obama campaigned on that platform, McCain and Co. attacked it, and he won 350+ electoral votes plus a supermajority in both chambers of Congress. His approval ratings and his partys Congressional caucus have dwindled since, not because he is "too liberal" or "socialist," but because he took office doing things like leaving homebuyers twisting in the wind while handing a $700 billion bailout to banks that knowingly and feloniously issued them bad loans. Supposedly he is FINALLY throwing the unwitting borrowers a $25 billion life line three years later, but if you check the fine print in the thread I just posted on that you will find all it does is protect those same banks from prosecution for their crimes. Homebuyers even a single payment behind are eligible for no relief, and what relief is available will be given out in order of increasing need.
Or take healthcare "reform." After six months of corporate bailout after corporate bailout his attention at last turned to his campaign cornerstone. So after campaigning on a public option with no public mandate, while opponents called it socialism and he won a landslide anyway, he delivered NO public option WITH a public mandate. It ensures no one healthcare, but requires everyone acquire it, while doing nothing about skyrocketing prices that prevented tens of millions buying insurance even under the threat of DEATH (but a $750 tax penalty will "fix" that. ) The only people who benefit are—another group of megacorps, this time the insurance industry promised $900 billion in tax money, plus whatever they charge those of their now captive customers who do not qualify for federal assistance.
Obama is in (deep) trouble, not because he attempted the socialism Republicans continually accuse him of, but because he did NOT. America was on board with another New Deal, just as in 1932; they were not convinced it would work, but knew what we had been doing for the past decade had failed. Instead we got more of the same, and people who voted for change are wondering why they bothered. Obama got Americans to believe again, convinced us we could actually get a populist president who works for us instead of lobbyists, and must now face the publics outrage at forsaking that pledge.
Even if he struggles to re-election, for no better reason than that Romney is such an awful candidate, Obamas legacy is probably Sammaels: Betrayer of Hope.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 12/02/2012 at 02:30:30 AM
Democrats bailing on Obama - War against the Catholic Church heats up
09/02/2012 04:03:35 AM
- 1679 Views
This is not a war on Catholics, it is Obama being an idiot again.
09/02/2012 04:52:01 AM
- 707 Views
For someone who used to be a Con Law professor
10/02/2012 08:23:34 PM
- 590 Views
In general, I disagree with that view, but not in this particular case.
11/02/2012 02:02:42 AM
- 821 Views
Also, kudos for linking to a source, and a fairly non-partisan one as well.
09/02/2012 01:33:07 PM
- 788 Views
I am a non-partisan guy, so I only use unbiased sources! *NM*
09/02/2012 04:02:50 PM
- 565 Views
Wanting both parties to be hit by a bus does not make one non-partisan.
09/02/2012 10:05:28 PM
- 655 Views
You lost all credibility in the first line of your post.
09/02/2012 04:49:23 PM
- 725 Views
You actually think any of us has 'credibility' anymore in regards to neutrality? *NM*
09/02/2012 06:46:13 PM
- 464 Views
It's one thing to have a bias.
09/02/2012 07:28:51 PM
- 763 Views
Wow, talk about making a supernova out of a couple hydrogen atoms.
09/02/2012 08:41:44 PM
- 561 Views
The Catholic Church wants to eliminate the birth control coverage requirement entirely.
10/02/2012 12:24:01 AM
- 862 Views
Sounds like they just do not want Catholics directly financing; great argument for public healthcare
10/02/2012 02:27:36 AM
- 796 Views
I'm somewhat suprised that Obama blundered this badly.
10/02/2012 01:40:14 AM
- 1589 Views
Why? Have you not been paying attention?
10/02/2012 02:03:43 AM
- 2024 Views
If I am not satisfied with Romney then my Plan B is to not vote.
10/02/2012 10:58:34 PM
- 2032 Views
How does that help anything? Except Romneys election chances, of course.
11/02/2012 01:08:22 AM
- 1874 Views
No everynametaken this is not unconsitutional according to the first ammendment
11/02/2012 12:14:29 AM
- 1901 Views
Obama doing this actually impresses me to no end.
10/02/2012 02:21:10 AM
- 2111 Views
He is already preparing to cave.
10/02/2012 02:42:32 AM
- 2103 Views
Why are you even replying to me? What you said has little meaning to what I said.
10/02/2012 03:33:27 AM
- 1879 Views
Aaaaand you can put your hat back on now: Obama has already caved.
10/02/2012 04:04:30 PM
- 2115 Views
Yup, the cave already happened.....you could have set your watch to this! *NM*
10/02/2012 05:00:02 PM
- 1650 Views
Actually, no, I could not; I expected it to take another week or two.
11/02/2012 01:27:31 AM
- 2016 Views
No, you don't have to buy it from insurers. You get it for free, just like everyone else will. *NM*
10/02/2012 09:55:53 PM
- 1770 Views
"The employees can then buy the coverage directly from an insurer."
11/02/2012 01:25:52 AM
- 2086 Views
Then that article is wrong.
11/02/2012 01:43:40 AM
- 2044 Views
Two days ago the White House said it would not back down from requiring school/hospital compliance.
11/02/2012 01:57:50 AM
- 2012 Views
So in summary... the article you posted was wrong.
11/02/2012 02:18:00 AM
- 1576 Views
To soon to tell, but if you think so feel free to demand a correction from them.
11/02/2012 03:12:40 AM
- 811 Views
Losing the exchanges is a pretty big loss
11/02/2012 03:30:15 AM
- 726 Views
So they refuse to cover it for the next two years, then do an about face in 2014.
11/02/2012 03:57:53 AM
- 875 Views
If Aetna does not provide the free contraception as part of the compromise
11/02/2012 02:46:14 AM
- 603 Views
Yeah, I saw that; if Aetna does not do as Obama says by 2014 they lose out on free profits then.
11/02/2012 03:13:36 AM
- 668 Views
So Jehovah Witness employers should not have to pay for blood transfusions?
10/02/2012 03:57:47 AM
- 676 Views
Not if it conflicts with their religious beliefs.
10/02/2012 04:20:32 PM
- 827 Views
Money is not the same as speech!
10/02/2012 07:20:56 PM
- 581 Views
And actions are different from both—until others are expected to pay for ones actions.
11/02/2012 12:53:40 AM
- 822 Views
No it isn't Joel, empirically you are dead wrong
10/02/2012 11:24:19 PM
- 809 Views
I do not see how requiring private entities do it instead of the feds is "least restrictive way."
11/02/2012 12:53:22 AM
- 803 Views
Catholic Charities of Sacramento Inc. v. Superior Court
11/02/2012 01:21:46 AM
- 742 Views
"the Court found that it wasn't a religious organization, it was just a non-profit corporation."
11/02/2012 01:36:33 AM
- 592 Views
One last point
10/02/2012 11:35:25 PM
- 905 Views
The federal government forcing private groups to facilitate without committing sin also infringes.
11/02/2012 01:03:30 AM
- 681 Views
You argument does not make sense
11/02/2012 01:26:57 AM
- 571 Views
It was an analogy, not an equivalency.
11/02/2012 01:48:14 AM
- 692 Views
Lets enhance your analogy making it closer to reality
11/02/2012 02:19:41 AM
- 781 Views
Why could I not buy it with my own money?
11/02/2012 03:46:33 AM
- 753 Views
Re: Why could I not buy it with my own money?
11/02/2012 04:17:17 AM
- 1997 Views
In other words, I could.
11/02/2012 04:21:05 AM
- 492 Views
You believe it can't help people since it is not single payer? *NM*
11/02/2012 04:31:13 AM
- 473 Views
Since you answered this in your other response I will just adress it there. *MN*
11/02/2012 05:59:37 AM
- 768 Views
Some more points
11/02/2012 02:30:27 AM
- 829 Views
Sex is not a necessity either.
11/02/2012 03:56:51 AM
- 750 Views
LMAO due to Obama's compromise (the word compromise should have a in it )
11/02/2012 12:12:57 AM
- 794 Views
Obama just got two weeks of being portrayed as "anti-church" to the point even Dems complained.
11/02/2012 02:00:28 AM
- 721 Views
The polls disagree with you.
11/02/2012 02:32:59 AM
- 679 Views
It is an interesting article, but not for the polls.
11/02/2012 04:18:17 AM
- 725 Views
I wouldn't put too much into that poll anyway
11/02/2012 05:37:05 AM
- 854 Views
Frankly, I hope Obamacare DOES die, just not because of the public mandate.
11/02/2012 07:18:04 AM
- 731 Views
I haven't really heard about it outside of this post, so the negative exposure can't be too bad.
11/02/2012 05:56:58 PM
- 560 Views
There seems to be plenty of Hell raising over it, but you are in the States and I am not.
11/02/2012 07:55:51 PM
- 584 Views
I don't think it's quite the laughing matter you think it is
11/02/2012 12:31:23 PM
- 731 Views
Understood.
11/02/2012 07:51:14 PM
- 714 Views
mmm...
11/02/2012 08:20:26 PM
- 742 Views
The man talked about during the campaign was the one elected with a mandate.
12/02/2012 02:28:15 AM
- 890 Views
I think Obama (for once) was far more clever you give him credit for...
15/02/2012 05:11:10 PM
- 943 Views
Surrendering on liberal issues then blaming Republicans is not just Obamas strategy, but his POLICY.
15/02/2012 07:23:04 PM
- 792 Views