So in summary... the article you posted was wrong.
Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 11/02/2012 02:18:00 AM
See the WaPo article below.
And here’s how it works after the compromise: “Our policy is saying that the Catholic hospital doesn’t want to cover contraceptives, and they don’t include that in their policy. It also says that Aetna needs to provide contraceptive services for free to workers in the plan. Aetna sets the premium, but it cannot be higher than it would have been without birth control. The premium does not include contraception.”
And, in the end, that leaves Aetna with the bill. “There is a sort of bank account,” says the official, “and Aetna is sucking it up.”
And, in the end, that leaves Aetna with the bill. “There is a sort of bank account,” says the official, “and Aetna is sucking it up.”
That sounds good, but the White House says a lot of things; in 2008 Obama said Democrats should nominate him instead of Hillary because his healthcare plan did not carry a public mandate and hers did.
"Aetna sets the premium, but it cannot be higher than it would have been without birth control." Just how are they verifying that? Remember, these are the same people who proudly declared health insurance available to everyone because they removed insurer freedom to deny coverage—WITHOUT establishing the very kind of price restrictions mentioned here, thereby allowing insurers to price people out of the market rather than denying them coverage outright. One of the healthcare "reforms" most critical failings is the near total absence of anything to slow, let alone halt or reverse, the growth in prices. Since they have done a complete 180° on this issue in just 48 hours, I will not believe that statement any more than I believed the last one until they demonstrate its veracity. Talk is cheap; it almost has to be with Obamas policies, because there is nothing to them BUT talk.
If you don't want to believe them, that's your prerogative. You still have no factual basis to claim that people will have to pay for coverage. The entire point of the preventive care rule is that it eliminates copays; it seems to me that they are pretty dedicated to making sure that applies evenly.
What you see as a complete 180, others see as savvy political maneuvering. (See article below.)
Democrats bailing on Obama - War against the Catholic Church heats up
09/02/2012 04:03:35 AM
- 1748 Views
This is not a war on Catholics, it is Obama being an idiot again.
09/02/2012 04:52:01 AM
- 779 Views
For someone who used to be a Con Law professor
10/02/2012 08:23:34 PM
- 669 Views
In general, I disagree with that view, but not in this particular case.
11/02/2012 02:02:42 AM
- 893 Views
Also, kudos for linking to a source, and a fairly non-partisan one as well.
09/02/2012 01:33:07 PM
- 857 Views
I am a non-partisan guy, so I only use unbiased sources!
*NM*
09/02/2012 04:02:50 PM
- 595 Views

Wanting both parties to be hit by a bus does not make one non-partisan.
09/02/2012 10:05:28 PM
- 734 Views

You lost all credibility in the first line of your post.
09/02/2012 04:49:23 PM
- 798 Views
You actually think any of us has 'credibility' anymore in regards to neutrality? *NM*
09/02/2012 06:46:13 PM
- 490 Views
It's one thing to have a bias.
09/02/2012 07:28:51 PM
- 833 Views
Wow, talk about making a supernova out of a couple hydrogen atoms.
09/02/2012 08:41:44 PM
- 643 Views
The Catholic Church wants to eliminate the birth control coverage requirement entirely.
10/02/2012 12:24:01 AM
- 939 Views
Sounds like they just do not want Catholics directly financing; great argument for public healthcare
10/02/2012 02:27:36 AM
- 885 Views
I'm somewhat suprised that Obama blundered this badly.
10/02/2012 01:40:14 AM
- 1663 Views
Why? Have you not been paying attention?
10/02/2012 02:03:43 AM
- 2098 Views

If I am not satisfied with Romney then my Plan B is to not vote.
10/02/2012 10:58:34 PM
- 2129 Views
How does that help anything? Except Romneys election chances, of course.
11/02/2012 01:08:22 AM
- 1944 Views
No everynametaken this is not unconsitutional according to the first ammendment
11/02/2012 12:14:29 AM
- 1942 Views
Obama doing this actually impresses me to no end.
10/02/2012 02:21:10 AM
- 2195 Views
He is already preparing to cave.
10/02/2012 02:42:32 AM
- 2172 Views
Why are you even replying to me? What you said has little meaning to what I said.
10/02/2012 03:33:27 AM
- 1965 Views
Aaaaand you can put your hat back on now: Obama has already caved.
10/02/2012 04:04:30 PM
- 2193 Views
Yup, the cave already happened.....you could have set your watch to this! *NM*
10/02/2012 05:00:02 PM
- 1679 Views
Actually, no, I could not; I expected it to take another week or two.
11/02/2012 01:27:31 AM
- 2080 Views
No, you don't have to buy it from insurers. You get it for free, just like everyone else will. *NM*
10/02/2012 09:55:53 PM
- 1825 Views
"The employees can then buy the coverage directly from an insurer."
11/02/2012 01:25:52 AM
- 2182 Views
Then that article is wrong.
11/02/2012 01:43:40 AM
- 2131 Views
Two days ago the White House said it would not back down from requiring school/hospital compliance.
11/02/2012 01:57:50 AM
- 2096 Views
So in summary... the article you posted was wrong.
11/02/2012 02:18:00 AM
- 1643 Views
To soon to tell, but if you think so feel free to demand a correction from them.
11/02/2012 03:12:40 AM
- 884 Views
Losing the exchanges is a pretty big loss
11/02/2012 03:30:15 AM
- 795 Views
So they refuse to cover it for the next two years, then do an about face in 2014.
11/02/2012 03:57:53 AM
- 962 Views
If Aetna does not provide the free contraception as part of the compromise
11/02/2012 02:46:14 AM
- 672 Views
Yeah, I saw that; if Aetna does not do as Obama says by 2014 they lose out on free profits then.
11/02/2012 03:13:36 AM
- 734 Views
So Jehovah Witness employers should not have to pay for blood transfusions?
10/02/2012 03:57:47 AM
- 751 Views
Not if it conflicts with their religious beliefs.
10/02/2012 04:20:32 PM
- 927 Views
Money is not the same as speech!
10/02/2012 07:20:56 PM
- 649 Views
And actions are different from both—until others are expected to pay for ones actions.
11/02/2012 12:53:40 AM
- 906 Views
No it isn't Joel, empirically you are dead wrong
10/02/2012 11:24:19 PM
- 891 Views
I do not see how requiring private entities do it instead of the feds is "least restrictive way."
11/02/2012 12:53:22 AM
- 875 Views
Catholic Charities of Sacramento Inc. v. Superior Court
11/02/2012 01:21:46 AM
- 809 Views
"the Court found that it wasn't a religious organization, it was just a non-profit corporation."
11/02/2012 01:36:33 AM
- 668 Views
One last point
10/02/2012 11:35:25 PM
- 978 Views
The federal government forcing private groups to facilitate without committing sin also infringes.
11/02/2012 01:03:30 AM
- 755 Views
You argument does not make sense
11/02/2012 01:26:57 AM
- 642 Views
It was an analogy, not an equivalency.
11/02/2012 01:48:14 AM
- 767 Views
Lets enhance your analogy making it closer to reality
11/02/2012 02:19:41 AM
- 873 Views
Why could I not buy it with my own money?
11/02/2012 03:46:33 AM
- 824 Views
Re: Why could I not buy it with my own money?
11/02/2012 04:17:17 AM
- 2072 Views
In other words, I could.
11/02/2012 04:21:05 AM
- 562 Views
You believe it can't help people since it is not single payer? *NM*
11/02/2012 04:31:13 AM
- 497 Views
Since you answered this in your other response I will just adress it there. *MN*
11/02/2012 05:59:37 AM
- 841 Views
Some more points
11/02/2012 02:30:27 AM
- 893 Views
Sex is not a necessity either.
11/02/2012 03:56:51 AM
- 837 Views
LMAO due to Obama's compromise (the word compromise should have a
in it )
11/02/2012 12:12:57 AM
- 868 Views

Obama just got two weeks of being portrayed as "anti-church" to the point even Dems complained.
11/02/2012 02:00:28 AM
- 792 Views
The polls disagree with you.
11/02/2012 02:32:59 AM
- 759 Views
It is an interesting article, but not for the polls.
11/02/2012 04:18:17 AM
- 802 Views
I wouldn't put too much into that poll anyway
11/02/2012 05:37:05 AM
- 935 Views
Frankly, I hope Obamacare DOES die, just not because of the public mandate.
11/02/2012 07:18:04 AM
- 805 Views
I haven't really heard about it outside of this post, so the negative exposure can't be too bad.
11/02/2012 05:56:58 PM
- 634 Views
There seems to be plenty of Hell raising over it, but you are in the States and I am not.
11/02/2012 07:55:51 PM
- 649 Views
I don't think it's quite the laughing matter you think it is
11/02/2012 12:31:23 PM
- 804 Views
Understood.
11/02/2012 07:51:14 PM
- 756 Views
mmm...
11/02/2012 08:20:26 PM
- 814 Views
The man talked about during the campaign was the one elected with a mandate.
12/02/2012 02:28:15 AM
- 957 Views
I think Obama (for once) was far more clever you give him credit for...
15/02/2012 05:11:10 PM
- 1016 Views
Surrendering on liberal issues then blaming Republicans is not just Obamas strategy, but his POLICY.
15/02/2012 07:23:04 PM
- 866 Views