Actually, it looks like Komens new VP (and former GOP GA gubernatorial candidate) had the incite. 
Joel Send a noteboard - 04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM
Joel Send a noteboard - 04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM
But you see nothing wrong with assigning motive to the people involved? That is a hard to even when you know something about the person but your assumptions were based on what? Republican=evil?
Sorry, I am not entirely sure what the first clause of that second sentence means. As to the rest, my assumption is based on "Republican=hates Planned Parenthood, because of abortion." Not always the case, but a pretty good general rule; I am sure your aunt would agree (RINOs excepted, of course.
)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Susan G. Komen cuts funds to Planned Parenthood. (with updated edit)
- 02/02/2012 04:32:27 PM
2257 Views
The most annoying part is in the sixth paragraph- abortions are only a small part of their thing
- 02/02/2012 05:08:07 PM
1161 Views
I agree.
- 02/02/2012 05:20:17 PM
1057 Views
Actually, there are longer-acting forms of birth control than the pill.
- 03/02/2012 12:37:42 AM
1040 Views
I do think that preventing abortions is their primary goal.
- 03/02/2012 01:08:05 AM
1008 Views
If they don't see that link, it's because they haven't looked.
- 03/02/2012 02:42:42 AM
1101 Views
That is a little unfair.
- 03/02/2012 12:48:46 PM
1305 Views
Won't someone please think of the children?!
- 04/02/2012 05:03:27 AM
1089 Views
I think you're leaving out some important points.
- 04/02/2012 03:40:48 PM
1028 Views
Ah, the good ol' silent majority.
- 04/02/2012 07:32:29 PM
1009 Views
So which moron is feeding you this crap?
- 04/02/2012 10:27:15 PM
1046 Views
It worries me when we think alike....
- 05/02/2012 01:22:35 PM
1069 Views
- 05/02/2012 01:22:35 PM
1069 Views
Brain waves at 8 weeks are a myth.
- 05/02/2012 08:46:06 PM
1170 Views
"brain function... appears to be reliably present in the fetus at about eight weeks' gestation."
- 05/02/2012 10:42:35 PM
1080 Views
Oh please.
- 05/02/2012 11:13:50 PM
1045 Views
Re: Oh please yourself.
- 06/02/2012 09:15:26 PM
910 Views
Quite a telling reply.
- 07/02/2012 04:38:20 AM
994 Views
Re: I quite agree.
- 08/02/2012 06:03:23 PM
1187 Views
You're taking an issue of objective facts and treating it like a day of playground gossip.
- 09/02/2012 03:47:06 AM
1018 Views
No, your source, in which there is very little that is objective, did that for me.
- 11/02/2012 02:59:45 AM
1054 Views
I see you have continued to provide no factual arguments.
- 14/02/2012 04:53:28 AM
1313 Views
I presented factual rebuttals.
- 19/02/2012 01:56:45 AM
1095 Views
You continue to miss the point.
- 23/02/2012 10:22:24 PM
1172 Views
No, I got the point: You expect me to accept a heavily biased, partisan and combative "source."
- 07/03/2012 01:47:37 AM
1095 Views
The claim of brain waves at 8 weeks is still unsupported by evidence, i.e. a myth.
- 15/03/2012 09:16:14 PM
1128 Views
Well, yes.
- 04/02/2012 11:14:47 PM
1090 Views
A silent majority may as well not exist, if it has no tangible effects.
- 05/02/2012 12:54:34 AM
1037 Views
You ignoring it is not the same thing as it having no tangible effect.
- 05/02/2012 02:11:36 AM
1129 Views
Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case.
- 04/02/2012 08:25:49 PM
1138 Views
Re: Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case.
- 05/02/2012 02:11:28 AM
1005 Views
If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 05/02/2012 08:42:17 AM
873 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 05/02/2012 10:04:59 PM
1050 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 06/02/2012 08:57:38 PM
1000 Views
I'm done discussing my use of the term "oppression." The Tim Ryan stuff is interesting, though.
- 07/02/2012 05:37:05 AM
1122 Views
Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 08/02/2012 06:01:32 PM
1211 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 09/02/2012 05:30:58 AM
1073 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 11/02/2012 02:58:00 AM
1093 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 14/02/2012 04:29:08 AM
1169 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 19/02/2012 01:54:30 AM
1073 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 23/02/2012 10:59:32 PM
1380 Views
There are problems with the implants
- 03/02/2012 01:42:55 AM
1065 Views
Any form of birth control doesn't work for everyone, though.
- 03/02/2012 02:37:00 AM
1081 Views
Oh yes, I totally agree! My point is just that there are some barriers to handing out implants 
*NM*
- 03/02/2012 03:38:05 AM
498 Views
*NM*
- 03/02/2012 03:38:05 AM
498 Views
What on earth does that have to do with anything?
- 03/02/2012 01:47:42 AM
988 Views
I was actually kinda with you until you closed with that anathema I condemned in my response to rt.
- 03/02/2012 01:39:06 PM
1025 Views
I agree that they have made Beast Cancer a cult but splitting with PP is just smart
- 02/02/2012 05:39:49 PM
1199 Views
I agree.
- 02/02/2012 06:00:17 PM
971 Views
yes she is going to have to piss off one group or the other
- 02/02/2012 06:12:31 PM
1039 Views
Right
- 02/02/2012 06:24:14 PM
1099 Views
it is a judgment call and I hope her decision is based on more than my guesses
- 02/02/2012 06:53:50 PM
961 Views
Do you see a way Komen could have avoided pissing off one side?
- 02/02/2012 06:55:36 PM
1034 Views
No, I don't. I don't believe I said that?
- 02/02/2012 07:53:50 PM
954 Views
You didn't; I inferred it from the way you phrased that ("if she HAS to..."). Sorry.
- 02/02/2012 08:06:11 PM
1024 Views
I know I'm not always clear.
- 02/02/2012 08:32:47 PM
1033 Views
- 02/02/2012 08:32:47 PM
1033 Views
Just curious...
- 02/02/2012 10:07:49 PM
1012 Views
Not at all.
- 02/02/2012 10:24:19 PM
1080 Views
Not at all?
- 02/02/2012 10:32:31 PM
972 Views
No.
- 02/02/2012 10:47:04 PM
928 Views
My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes
- 02/02/2012 11:17:24 PM
1026 Views
Re: My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes
- 03/02/2012 12:08:01 AM
1022 Views
wow that may be the worst advice I had in weeks
- 03/02/2012 12:13:18 AM
1001 Views
- 03/02/2012 12:13:18 AM
1001 Views
Ooor, the best.
- 03/02/2012 12:25:56 AM
973 Views
ok now you are just being mean *NM*
- 03/02/2012 12:46:12 AM
611 Views
The thread was going too well - I thought we needed the meanness. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 11:30:39 AM
561 Views
Never having heard of any of those except PP, my opinion may not be the most relevant...
- 02/02/2012 08:32:48 PM
1089 Views
You don't know stuff.
- 02/02/2012 08:43:38 PM
1056 Views
I know the stuff that matters. 
- 02/02/2012 09:55:08 PM
958 Views
- 02/02/2012 09:55:08 PM
958 Views
they may also be a afraid that PP will go the way of ACORN
- 02/02/2012 11:04:16 PM
1104 Views
"Accused" of = unfounded slander.
- 03/02/2012 12:13:30 AM
1125 Views
did you notice I called tactic disgusting? That doesn't mean it isn't effective
- 03/02/2012 12:45:10 AM
1054 Views
The investigation by Congress is well-known to be specious. It's the House GOP abusing their power. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 12:41:58 AM
663 Views
This is so foreign a debate for me
- 02/02/2012 10:16:15 PM
1082 Views
Re: stuff
- 03/02/2012 09:18:53 AM
975 Views
I'm sorry, but what're we talking about when we're talking about "cancer"
- 03/02/2012 12:49:34 PM
1007 Views
Obviously not adenocarcinoma, no.
- 04/02/2012 07:36:06 AM
1027 Views
I"m not that fussed. I'm just generally leary of research that has results like that
- 04/02/2012 08:35:04 PM
967 Views
Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense.
- 02/02/2012 10:54:34 PM
1052 Views
Re: Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense.
- 02/02/2012 11:03:32 PM
978 Views
After a little more digging I have to say you are probably right.
- 03/02/2012 02:23:14 AM
913 Views
They restored funding incidentally
- 03/02/2012 05:43:47 PM
964 Views
Unless I've missed it
- 03/02/2012 05:56:15 PM
1040 Views
You must have missed it then
- 03/02/2012 07:07:13 PM
960 Views
If you're referring to Cannoli
- 03/02/2012 07:19:25 PM
1117 Views
Multiple was not an accidental choice of words
- 03/02/2012 11:46:30 PM
1009 Views
Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you.
- 04/02/2012 12:41:42 AM
1030 Views
Re: Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you.
- 04/02/2012 01:53:25 AM
1220 Views
well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision
- 03/02/2012 06:24:14 PM
1150 Views
Re: well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision
- 03/02/2012 06:29:34 PM
931 Views
I do wonder a bit which lawmakers Fox thinks "pressured" Komen.
- 03/02/2012 08:29:50 PM
959 Views
Beyond the 26 senators, I'd imagine rumor of the more reliable sort
- 03/02/2012 08:46:31 PM
1022 Views
Well, if they wrote AS senators rather than friends of Nancy Brinker, that probably qualifies.
- 03/02/2012 10:24:11 PM
1082 Views
Judge for yourself
- 04/02/2012 12:01:06 AM
1085 Views
Well, a public letter makes whether they signed it "Sen. so-and-so" irrelevant: It is political.
- 04/02/2012 04:07:20 PM
1011 Views
are you trying to disprove the study you posted?
- 03/02/2012 09:20:12 PM
1098 Views
To me, it depends on the nature of the contact, which I have not dug enough to discover.
- 03/02/2012 10:43:45 PM
993 Views
you admit you have no incite into what happened
- 04/02/2012 04:27:17 AM
1016 Views
Actually, it looks like Komens new VP (and former GOP GA gubernatorial candidate) had the incite.
- 04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM
1058 Views
- 04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM
1058 Views
educated guess don't work when you are tinfoil hat wearing kool-aid drinker
- 04/02/2012 09:33:49 PM
967 Views