Beyond the 26 senators, I'd imagine rumor of the more reliable sort
Isaac Send a noteboard - 03/02/2012 08:46:31 PM
I never got the impression any lawmakers applied any pressure either way, at least not in official capacity. I doubt anyone could spend as much time in Bush 43s administration as Nancy Brinker did without acquiring a few far right friends (or have been named an Ambassador by Bush without already having plenty,) but that is not the same as a Congressman applying pressure AS a Congressman rather than a friend and/or ally.
Oh, I'm entirely sure pressure was applied, likely from all sorts and sides. Incidentally "Update II - Komen: Future Funding not assured". So witness that they are now in utter meltdown mode and I'm guessing their attempts to appease everyone will backfire horribly, not that I blame them.
I'm only citing the article though Fox isn't the only one saying that, but the rumor mill has it a lot of lobbyists made a lotta lotta phone calls. The official specifics, which was mentioned at the bottom of the article, were 26 senators writing to ask them to reconsider. And that personally bugs me, I like to think I'd say the same if 26 GOP senators had written them to ask them to stop, and I probably would have, but who knows? But it is that letter I have issues with, even though I'm sure it was entirely polite. Not that I don't think politicians should utterly avoid criticizing or involving themselves with charities but that's a bit extreme for a fairly unconnected matter, IMHO.
My own impression (nothing more) is Nancy Brinker had intended the break with Planned Parenthood for a while and thought the House investigation (which even the Komens statement calls "political" and explicitly denies is "criminal") plus a timely new "rule" gave her cover to do so. Again, apparently she was mistaken.
So, I agree with you: Politicizing a charity is bad for the charity. My guess is all the Komen executives who resigned in the last 24 hours agree also.
Well, I hate to criticize them but as I said to Ray, piper, dues. I regret that this happened but I consider this something of an inevitable consequence to pushing a charity that hard and visibly over the years, KFC aside, I really do worry that our tendency to have pop causes distracts from equally important work, but I'd also guess the net money raised for the collective cause is higher than if they hadn't. No, I'm not so much beating on anyone for what happened, even the various politicos and pundits who jumped in, just bemoaning, as I said, the inevitability of the jackals getting in the door once the whiff of power and influence emerge.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Susan G. Komen cuts funds to Planned Parenthood. (with updated edit)
- 02/02/2012 04:32:27 PM
2629 Views
The most annoying part is in the sixth paragraph- abortions are only a small part of their thing
- 02/02/2012 05:08:07 PM
1486 Views
I agree.
- 02/02/2012 05:20:17 PM
1353 Views
Actually, there are longer-acting forms of birth control than the pill.
- 03/02/2012 12:37:42 AM
1362 Views
I do think that preventing abortions is their primary goal.
- 03/02/2012 01:08:05 AM
1351 Views
If they don't see that link, it's because they haven't looked.
- 03/02/2012 02:42:42 AM
1434 Views
That is a little unfair.
- 03/02/2012 12:48:46 PM
1704 Views
Won't someone please think of the children?!
- 04/02/2012 05:03:27 AM
1425 Views
I think you're leaving out some important points.
- 04/02/2012 03:40:48 PM
1322 Views
Ah, the good ol' silent majority.
- 04/02/2012 07:32:29 PM
1331 Views
So which moron is feeding you this crap?
- 04/02/2012 10:27:15 PM
1375 Views
It worries me when we think alike....
- 05/02/2012 01:22:35 PM
1443 Views
- 05/02/2012 01:22:35 PM
1443 Views
Brain waves at 8 weeks are a myth.
- 05/02/2012 08:46:06 PM
1499 Views
"brain function... appears to be reliably present in the fetus at about eight weeks' gestation."
- 05/02/2012 10:42:35 PM
1433 Views
Oh please.
- 05/02/2012 11:13:50 PM
1375 Views
Re: Oh please yourself.
- 06/02/2012 09:15:26 PM
1261 Views
Quite a telling reply.
- 07/02/2012 04:38:20 AM
1358 Views
Re: I quite agree.
- 08/02/2012 06:03:23 PM
1550 Views
You're taking an issue of objective facts and treating it like a day of playground gossip.
- 09/02/2012 03:47:06 AM
1370 Views
No, your source, in which there is very little that is objective, did that for me.
- 11/02/2012 02:59:45 AM
1396 Views
I see you have continued to provide no factual arguments.
- 14/02/2012 04:53:28 AM
1693 Views
I presented factual rebuttals.
- 19/02/2012 01:56:45 AM
1442 Views
You continue to miss the point.
- 23/02/2012 10:22:24 PM
1530 Views
No, I got the point: You expect me to accept a heavily biased, partisan and combative "source."
- 07/03/2012 01:47:37 AM
1457 Views
The claim of brain waves at 8 weeks is still unsupported by evidence, i.e. a myth.
- 15/03/2012 09:16:14 PM
1515 Views
Well, yes.
- 04/02/2012 11:14:47 PM
1462 Views
A silent majority may as well not exist, if it has no tangible effects.
- 05/02/2012 12:54:34 AM
1336 Views
You ignoring it is not the same thing as it having no tangible effect.
- 05/02/2012 02:11:36 AM
1451 Views
Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case.
- 04/02/2012 08:25:49 PM
1501 Views
Re: Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case.
- 05/02/2012 02:11:28 AM
1365 Views
If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 05/02/2012 08:42:17 AM
1192 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 05/02/2012 10:04:59 PM
1389 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 06/02/2012 08:57:38 PM
1322 Views
I'm done discussing my use of the term "oppression." The Tim Ryan stuff is interesting, though.
- 07/02/2012 05:37:05 AM
1471 Views
Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 08/02/2012 06:01:32 PM
1578 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 09/02/2012 05:30:58 AM
1430 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 11/02/2012 02:58:00 AM
1430 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 14/02/2012 04:29:08 AM
1519 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 19/02/2012 01:54:30 AM
1411 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 23/02/2012 10:59:32 PM
1736 Views
There are problems with the implants
- 03/02/2012 01:42:55 AM
1406 Views
Any form of birth control doesn't work for everyone, though.
- 03/02/2012 02:37:00 AM
1422 Views
Oh yes, I totally agree! My point is just that there are some barriers to handing out implants
*NM*
- 03/02/2012 03:38:05 AM
671 Views
*NM*
- 03/02/2012 03:38:05 AM
671 Views
What on earth does that have to do with anything?
- 03/02/2012 01:47:42 AM
1312 Views
I was actually kinda with you until you closed with that anathema I condemned in my response to rt.
- 03/02/2012 01:39:06 PM
1366 Views
I agree that they have made Beast Cancer a cult but splitting with PP is just smart
- 02/02/2012 05:39:49 PM
1552 Views
I agree.
- 02/02/2012 06:00:17 PM
1330 Views
yes she is going to have to piss off one group or the other
- 02/02/2012 06:12:31 PM
1372 Views
Right
- 02/02/2012 06:24:14 PM
1433 Views
it is a judgment call and I hope her decision is based on more than my guesses
- 02/02/2012 06:53:50 PM
1304 Views
Do you see a way Komen could have avoided pissing off one side?
- 02/02/2012 06:55:36 PM
1337 Views
No, I don't. I don't believe I said that?
- 02/02/2012 07:53:50 PM
1268 Views
You didn't; I inferred it from the way you phrased that ("if she HAS to..."). Sorry.
- 02/02/2012 08:06:11 PM
1448 Views
I know I'm not always clear.
- 02/02/2012 08:32:47 PM
1353 Views
- 02/02/2012 08:32:47 PM
1353 Views
Just curious...
- 02/02/2012 10:07:49 PM
1348 Views
Not at all.
- 02/02/2012 10:24:19 PM
1386 Views
Not at all?
- 02/02/2012 10:32:31 PM
1295 Views
No.
- 02/02/2012 10:47:04 PM
1237 Views
My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes
- 02/02/2012 11:17:24 PM
1315 Views
Re: My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes
- 03/02/2012 12:08:01 AM
1329 Views
wow that may be the worst advice I had in weeks
- 03/02/2012 12:13:18 AM
1320 Views
- 03/02/2012 12:13:18 AM
1320 Views
Ooor, the best.
- 03/02/2012 12:25:56 AM
1301 Views
ok now you are just being mean *NM*
- 03/02/2012 12:46:12 AM
789 Views
The thread was going too well - I thought we needed the meanness. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 11:30:39 AM
727 Views
Never having heard of any of those except PP, my opinion may not be the most relevant...
- 02/02/2012 08:32:48 PM
1411 Views
You don't know stuff.
- 02/02/2012 08:43:38 PM
1393 Views
I know the stuff that matters.
- 02/02/2012 09:55:08 PM
1273 Views
- 02/02/2012 09:55:08 PM
1273 Views
they may also be a afraid that PP will go the way of ACORN
- 02/02/2012 11:04:16 PM
1440 Views
"Accused" of = unfounded slander.
- 03/02/2012 12:13:30 AM
1462 Views
did you notice I called tactic disgusting? That doesn't mean it isn't effective
- 03/02/2012 12:45:10 AM
1395 Views
The investigation by Congress is well-known to be specious. It's the House GOP abusing their power. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 12:41:58 AM
818 Views
This is so foreign a debate for me
- 02/02/2012 10:16:15 PM
1404 Views
Re: stuff
- 03/02/2012 09:18:53 AM
1272 Views
I'm sorry, but what're we talking about when we're talking about "cancer"
- 03/02/2012 12:49:34 PM
1346 Views
Obviously not adenocarcinoma, no.
- 04/02/2012 07:36:06 AM
1438 Views
I"m not that fussed. I'm just generally leary of research that has results like that
- 04/02/2012 08:35:04 PM
1275 Views
Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense.
- 02/02/2012 10:54:34 PM
1434 Views
Re: Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense.
- 02/02/2012 11:03:32 PM
1307 Views
After a little more digging I have to say you are probably right.
- 03/02/2012 02:23:14 AM
1219 Views
They restored funding incidentally
- 03/02/2012 05:43:47 PM
1337 Views
Unless I've missed it
- 03/02/2012 05:56:15 PM
1372 Views
You must have missed it then
- 03/02/2012 07:07:13 PM
1331 Views
If you're referring to Cannoli
- 03/02/2012 07:19:25 PM
1469 Views
Multiple was not an accidental choice of words
- 03/02/2012 11:46:30 PM
1328 Views
Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you.
- 04/02/2012 12:41:42 AM
1368 Views
Re: Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you.
- 04/02/2012 01:53:25 AM
1561 Views
well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision
- 03/02/2012 06:24:14 PM
1461 Views
Re: well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision
- 03/02/2012 06:29:34 PM
1279 Views
I do wonder a bit which lawmakers Fox thinks "pressured" Komen.
- 03/02/2012 08:29:50 PM
1290 Views
Beyond the 26 senators, I'd imagine rumor of the more reliable sort
- 03/02/2012 08:46:31 PM
1364 Views
Well, if they wrote AS senators rather than friends of Nancy Brinker, that probably qualifies.
- 03/02/2012 10:24:11 PM
1403 Views
Judge for yourself
- 04/02/2012 12:01:06 AM
1425 Views
Well, a public letter makes whether they signed it "Sen. so-and-so" irrelevant: It is political.
- 04/02/2012 04:07:20 PM
1355 Views
are you trying to disprove the study you posted?
- 03/02/2012 09:20:12 PM
1463 Views
To me, it depends on the nature of the contact, which I have not dug enough to discover.
- 03/02/2012 10:43:45 PM
1290 Views
you admit you have no incite into what happened
- 04/02/2012 04:27:17 AM
1374 Views
Actually, it looks like Komens new VP (and former GOP GA gubernatorial candidate) had the incite.
- 04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM
1420 Views
- 04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM
1420 Views
educated guess don't work when you are tinfoil hat wearing kool-aid drinker
- 04/02/2012 09:33:49 PM
1319 Views


*NM*