I was actually kinda with you until you closed with that anathema I condemned in my response to rt.
Joel Send a noteboard - 03/02/2012 01:39:06 PM
The bulk of its activities are focused on contraception, STI screening, and cancer screening, and it places a particular emphasis on providing reproductive health care to people who otherwise wouldn't have access.
A lot of that stuff can be pricey- I know quite a few girls who have benefited tremendously just from getting discounted services from there.
For every single murderer in history, that was only a small part of what he did. A man who has lived for four decades goes down in memory for all time as a murderer for a single digit number of homicides. This sort of arrogance on the part of liberals, who, because they have the mainstream media's ear, don't need to pay attention to other people's opinions, is what leads to attacks on abortion clinics and doctors. People who are opposed to abortion do so BECAUSE THEY BELIEVE IT IS MURDER! The fact that the destruction of innocent human life is just ONE of a wide-ranging array of activities and interests is a completely irrelevant criterion for the opponents of Planned Parenthood. Meanwhile, Ron Paul gets slammed for letting his name be associated with some writings of questionable content years ago, but for a liberal organization, heavily involved in a liberal issue, "it's just a small part of what they do." Everyone has to answer for their own actions. Period. The fact that they were founded to sterilize the black race out of existence - oh, no. That's no longer relevant. That they used to advise women to douche with Lysol - why would ANY women's health advocates have a problem with such a group? But religious education still has to contend with the fact that some backwoods, under-educated preachers in the medieval era were associated with the Flat-Earth society of their time. Companies today are still hounded about the fact that they sold computers to the Nazis, but Planned Parenthood goes by the same name under which the KKK praised them, and these sordid details of their history are allowed to die out. They are caught on tape giving practiced, experienced counsel on how to get around the laws against sex trafficking, but anyone who opposes them is "anti-woman." As far as I am concerned, take away those functions of the female anatomy with which PP is so involved in, and you have smaller, weaker, less rational men, who coast along under the protection of a hypocritical racket that lets them pass the consequences of their irresponsible behavior onto the rest of us. "My body, my choice," then pay for your own damn birth control, abortions, child care and educations. Your body, your choice, but the taxpayer picks up the bill. Who can blame a charitable foundation intended to support innocent female victims for backing out on supporting a group that victimizes the rest of society on behalf of irresponsible & selfish women.
Yeah, sorry, you cannot support the right of everyone to be free in precisely your preferred manner. I cannot make you vote for Obama just because I paid for the military that defends your right to vote. For one thing, I only paid for PART of it; you also paid for part of it, and if you did not enjoy the rights they defend you would deserve your money back (but then, IIRC, you think we long ago reached that stage, which is much of the problem. )
Yet on a far more important and fundamental level, you would not be free if I dictated your actions; even if I had the power it would be a betrayal of all my ideals as an American. Not only as an American though; if you believe everyone has the right to be free in precisely the manner you dictate it is time to trade in your bible for a copy of The Fountainhead. Fair warning: The prose is as much inferior as the philosophy.
For further elaboration, see sig....
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Susan G. Komen cuts funds to Planned Parenthood. (with updated edit)
02/02/2012 04:32:27 PM
- 2199 Views
The most annoying part is in the sixth paragraph- abortions are only a small part of their thing
02/02/2012 05:08:07 PM
- 1090 Views
I agree.
02/02/2012 05:20:17 PM
- 1001 Views
Actually, there are longer-acting forms of birth control than the pill.
03/02/2012 12:37:42 AM
- 984 Views
I do think that preventing abortions is their primary goal.
03/02/2012 01:08:05 AM
- 949 Views
If they don't see that link, it's because they haven't looked.
03/02/2012 02:42:42 AM
- 1033 Views
That is a little unfair.
03/02/2012 12:48:46 PM
- 1241 Views
Won't someone please think of the children?!
04/02/2012 05:03:27 AM
- 1031 Views
I think you're leaving out some important points.
04/02/2012 03:40:48 PM
- 975 Views
Ah, the good ol' silent majority.
04/02/2012 07:32:29 PM
- 947 Views
So which moron is feeding you this crap?
04/02/2012 10:27:15 PM
- 970 Views
It worries me when we think alike....
05/02/2012 01:22:35 PM
- 1005 Views
Brain waves at 8 weeks are a myth.
05/02/2012 08:46:06 PM
- 1109 Views
"brain function... appears to be reliably present in the fetus at about eight weeks' gestation."
05/02/2012 10:42:35 PM
- 1022 Views
Oh please.
05/02/2012 11:13:50 PM
- 986 Views
Re: Oh please yourself.
06/02/2012 09:15:26 PM
- 865 Views
Quite a telling reply.
07/02/2012 04:38:20 AM
- 928 Views
Re: I quite agree.
08/02/2012 06:03:23 PM
- 1133 Views
You're taking an issue of objective facts and treating it like a day of playground gossip.
09/02/2012 03:47:06 AM
- 972 Views
No, your source, in which there is very little that is objective, did that for me.
11/02/2012 02:59:45 AM
- 993 Views
I see you have continued to provide no factual arguments.
14/02/2012 04:53:28 AM
- 1231 Views
I presented factual rebuttals.
19/02/2012 01:56:45 AM
- 1022 Views
You continue to miss the point.
23/02/2012 10:22:24 PM
- 1113 Views
No, I got the point: You expect me to accept a heavily biased, partisan and combative "source."
07/03/2012 01:47:37 AM
- 1033 Views
The claim of brain waves at 8 weeks is still unsupported by evidence, i.e. a myth.
15/03/2012 09:16:14 PM
- 1071 Views
Well, yes.
04/02/2012 11:14:47 PM
- 1032 Views
A silent majority may as well not exist, if it has no tangible effects.
05/02/2012 12:54:34 AM
- 976 Views
You ignoring it is not the same thing as it having no tangible effect.
05/02/2012 02:11:36 AM
- 1071 Views
Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case.
04/02/2012 08:25:49 PM
- 1060 Views
Re: Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case.
05/02/2012 02:11:28 AM
- 970 Views
If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
05/02/2012 08:42:17 AM
- 804 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
05/02/2012 10:04:59 PM
- 973 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
06/02/2012 08:57:38 PM
- 953 Views
I'm done discussing my use of the term "oppression." The Tim Ryan stuff is interesting, though.
07/02/2012 05:37:05 AM
- 1050 Views
Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
08/02/2012 06:01:32 PM
- 1143 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
09/02/2012 05:30:58 AM
- 1008 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
11/02/2012 02:58:00 AM
- 1037 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
14/02/2012 04:29:08 AM
- 1101 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
19/02/2012 01:54:30 AM
- 1018 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
23/02/2012 10:59:32 PM
- 1316 Views
There are problems with the implants
03/02/2012 01:42:55 AM
- 996 Views
Any form of birth control doesn't work for everyone, though.
03/02/2012 02:37:00 AM
- 1018 Views
Oh yes, I totally agree! My point is just that there are some barriers to handing out implants *NM*
03/02/2012 03:38:05 AM
- 469 Views
What on earth does that have to do with anything?
03/02/2012 01:47:42 AM
- 930 Views
I was actually kinda with you until you closed with that anathema I condemned in my response to rt.
03/02/2012 01:39:06 PM
- 958 Views
I agree that they have made Beast Cancer a cult but splitting with PP is just smart
02/02/2012 05:39:49 PM
- 1131 Views
I agree.
02/02/2012 06:00:17 PM
- 913 Views
yes she is going to have to piss off one group or the other
02/02/2012 06:12:31 PM
- 979 Views
Right
02/02/2012 06:24:14 PM
- 1031 Views
it is a judgment call and I hope her decision is based on more than my guesses
02/02/2012 06:53:50 PM
- 900 Views
Do you see a way Komen could have avoided pissing off one side?
02/02/2012 06:55:36 PM
- 978 Views
No, I don't. I don't believe I said that?
02/02/2012 07:53:50 PM
- 887 Views
You didn't; I inferred it from the way you phrased that ("if she HAS to..."). Sorry.
02/02/2012 08:06:11 PM
- 969 Views
I know I'm not always clear.
02/02/2012 08:32:47 PM
- 971 Views
Just curious...
02/02/2012 10:07:49 PM
- 953 Views
Not at all.
02/02/2012 10:24:19 PM
- 1019 Views
Not at all?
02/02/2012 10:32:31 PM
- 909 Views
No.
02/02/2012 10:47:04 PM
- 870 Views
My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes
02/02/2012 11:17:24 PM
- 965 Views
Re: My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes
03/02/2012 12:08:01 AM
- 960 Views
wow that may be the worst advice I had in weeks
03/02/2012 12:13:18 AM
- 924 Views
Ooor, the best.
03/02/2012 12:25:56 AM
- 904 Views
ok now you are just being mean *NM*
03/02/2012 12:46:12 AM
- 589 Views
The thread was going too well - I thought we needed the meanness. *NM*
03/02/2012 11:30:39 AM
- 536 Views
Never having heard of any of those except PP, my opinion may not be the most relevant...
02/02/2012 08:32:48 PM
- 1037 Views
You don't know stuff.
02/02/2012 08:43:38 PM
- 1000 Views
I know the stuff that matters.
02/02/2012 09:55:08 PM
- 901 Views
they may also be a afraid that PP will go the way of ACORN
02/02/2012 11:04:16 PM
- 1046 Views
"Accused" of = unfounded slander.
03/02/2012 12:13:30 AM
- 1056 Views
did you notice I called tactic disgusting? That doesn't mean it isn't effective
03/02/2012 12:45:10 AM
- 985 Views
The investigation by Congress is well-known to be specious. It's the House GOP abusing their power. *NM*
03/02/2012 12:41:58 AM
- 645 Views
This is so foreign a debate for me
02/02/2012 10:16:15 PM
- 1022 Views
Re: stuff
03/02/2012 09:18:53 AM
- 919 Views
I'm sorry, but what're we talking about when we're talking about "cancer"
03/02/2012 12:49:34 PM
- 950 Views
Obviously not adenocarcinoma, no.
04/02/2012 07:36:06 AM
- 963 Views
I"m not that fussed. I'm just generally leary of research that has results like that
04/02/2012 08:35:04 PM
- 908 Views
Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense.
02/02/2012 10:54:34 PM
- 1001 Views
Re: Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense.
02/02/2012 11:03:32 PM
- 926 Views
After a little more digging I have to say you are probably right.
03/02/2012 02:23:14 AM
- 863 Views
They restored funding incidentally
03/02/2012 05:43:47 PM
- 898 Views
Unless I've missed it
03/02/2012 05:56:15 PM
- 984 Views
You must have missed it then
03/02/2012 07:07:13 PM
- 900 Views
If you're referring to Cannoli
03/02/2012 07:19:25 PM
- 1053 Views
Multiple was not an accidental choice of words
03/02/2012 11:46:30 PM
- 930 Views
Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you.
04/02/2012 12:41:42 AM
- 962 Views
Re: Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you.
04/02/2012 01:53:25 AM
- 1153 Views
well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision
03/02/2012 06:24:14 PM
- 1096 Views
Re: well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision
03/02/2012 06:29:34 PM
- 869 Views
I do wonder a bit which lawmakers Fox thinks "pressured" Komen.
03/02/2012 08:29:50 PM
- 899 Views
Beyond the 26 senators, I'd imagine rumor of the more reliable sort
03/02/2012 08:46:31 PM
- 967 Views
Well, if they wrote AS senators rather than friends of Nancy Brinker, that probably qualifies.
03/02/2012 10:24:11 PM
- 1016 Views
Judge for yourself
04/02/2012 12:01:06 AM
- 1024 Views
Well, a public letter makes whether they signed it "Sen. so-and-so" irrelevant: It is political.
04/02/2012 04:07:20 PM
- 952 Views
are you trying to disprove the study you posted?
03/02/2012 09:20:12 PM
- 1028 Views
To me, it depends on the nature of the contact, which I have not dug enough to discover.
03/02/2012 10:43:45 PM
- 930 Views
you admit you have no incite into what happened
04/02/2012 04:27:17 AM
- 951 Views
Actually, it looks like Komens new VP (and former GOP GA gubernatorial candidate) had the incite.
04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM
- 1001 Views
educated guess don't work when you are tinfoil hat wearing kool-aid drinker
04/02/2012 09:33:49 PM
- 899 Views