And give me a break; apparently the ruling is only, like, two weeks old. I did find a Forbes article on it just now that is interesting though. Enough so that I cannot decide whether I agree more with Scalias (!) majority opinion or the concurring ones offered by the courts liberals (and Alito (!!))
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Upcoming Chicago G8 Summit Focuses Attention on Illinois First Amendment Infringement
- 03/02/2012 12:20:25 AM
953 Views
police officiers have nothing to fear fromvideo taping? Sorry Joel but that is pure crap
- 03/02/2012 01:01:51 AM
528 Views
There's a simple solution to this
- 03/02/2012 02:38:05 AM
476 Views
would you take a job where your ever move was captured on tape?
- 03/02/2012 02:59:46 AM
561 Views
I have had two, that I recall off the top of my head; SOME of us are NOT too good for some jobs. 
- 03/02/2012 03:11:29 AM
433 Views
- 03/02/2012 03:11:29 AM
433 Views
yes so we would end up with people like you as cops, thanks for making my point
- 03/02/2012 04:09:54 AM
402 Views
So if your point is invalid the problem is me; glad to see you are being objective here.
- 03/02/2012 04:23:03 AM
369 Views
- 03/02/2012 04:23:03 AM
369 Views
If there were mobs of anger idiots looking set up situation where you could be defaimed
- 03/02/2012 04:50:36 AM
455 Views
If it makes you feel better, Rod Blagojevich agrees context ALWAYS exonerates ANYTHING.
- 03/02/2012 07:24:55 AM
615 Views
I'm not asking them to wear them when they go home for the day
- 03/02/2012 05:20:42 AM
494 Views
that is just Big Brother for thee but not for me
- 03/02/2012 05:45:02 PM
567 Views
This started from the banning of video taping things happening in public
- 03/02/2012 08:22:22 PM
504 Views
There are lots of jobs like that
- 03/02/2012 06:19:21 AM
521 Views
and how many of those cameras are controlled by activist looking to smear them?
- 03/02/2012 05:35:32 PM
593 Views
Isn't this already the case with many police officers / departments?
- 03/02/2012 01:02:25 PM
434 Views
Yes and no; in many cases they can and do turn off the cameras when it suits them.
- 03/02/2012 02:33:32 PM
577 Views
I have a job that does that. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 04:37:44 PM
185 Views
a lot of jobs monitor and area but very an individual to wear a camera *NM*
- 03/02/2012 05:47:59 PM
187 Views
Write a sentence that can be understood and maybe I'll reply with something relevant. *NM*
- 04/02/2012 04:57:27 PM
155 Views
i can't tell if you're making a point or just stupid....
- 03/02/2012 02:42:11 AM
465 Views
luck for my job isn't so hard. Judging you as stupid is an easy call
- 03/02/2012 03:46:12 AM
521 Views
The pepper spraying? That is the best you can do?
- 03/02/2012 02:54:43 AM
698 Views
OK I see the problem and it is rampant ignorance
- 03/02/2012 04:33:47 AM
541 Views
I think we could find a middle ground
- 03/02/2012 06:06:32 AM
425 Views
I agree there should be some middle ground
- 03/02/2012 05:26:33 PM
475 Views
Um, HELLO, it is a felony for journalists to tape police in IL, too.
- 03/02/2012 07:16:15 PM
514 Views
That is definitely the problem, though casting aspersions on everyone you can think of hurts, too.
- 03/02/2012 06:55:30 AM
649 Views
unfortunately most cops seem to want a double standard
- 03/02/2012 02:39:01 AM
451 Views
Ah; I did not realize the SCOTUS had overturned that.
- 03/02/2012 03:05:12 AM
403 Views
9-0 decision -- where were you?
- 03/02/2012 06:53:56 AM
515 Views
- 03/02/2012 06:53:56 AM
515 Views
Um, Norway? 
- 03/02/2012 07:08:11 AM
473 Views
- 03/02/2012 07:08:11 AM
473 Views
Well, public or private, one does not leave one's right to privacy at the door
- 03/02/2012 05:19:12 PM
432 Views