At some point any sufficiently large charity ends up being more like a large corporation than anything else - kind of has to be, for the reason you name and many others. But looking it up first seems like a good plan.
Oh, I'm fully aware of that, re: corporations.
I'm not sure what your question there is... do you mean, is it fair for you to deny them funds on suspicion of having cut aid to PP because of being closet pro-lifers? I'm not sure anyone other than you can answer that.
I was thinking more legally - innocent until proven guilty. Obv, I have NO idea if there is any similar concept for organizations. It just feels wrong when I think about punishing that org before any claims are proven.
Seems to me that it's mostly the investigation in Congress that came up at an opportune time, but yeah, one would need to know whether they already had - and applied - this policy before, which isn't exactly information you can find out easily, unless you get lucky.
Right.
Susan G. Komen cuts funds to Planned Parenthood. (with updated edit)
- 02/02/2012 04:32:27 PM
2210 Views
The most annoying part is in the sixth paragraph- abortions are only a small part of their thing
- 02/02/2012 05:08:07 PM
1099 Views
I agree.
- 02/02/2012 05:20:17 PM
1003 Views
Actually, there are longer-acting forms of birth control than the pill.
- 03/02/2012 12:37:42 AM
989 Views
I do think that preventing abortions is their primary goal.
- 03/02/2012 01:08:05 AM
955 Views
If they don't see that link, it's because they haven't looked.
- 03/02/2012 02:42:42 AM
1040 Views
That is a little unfair.
- 03/02/2012 12:48:46 PM
1250 Views
Won't someone please think of the children?!
- 04/02/2012 05:03:27 AM
1034 Views
I think you're leaving out some important points.
- 04/02/2012 03:40:48 PM
979 Views
Ah, the good ol' silent majority.
- 04/02/2012 07:32:29 PM
956 Views
So which moron is feeding you this crap?
- 04/02/2012 10:27:15 PM
973 Views
It worries me when we think alike.... 
- 05/02/2012 01:22:35 PM
1013 Views
- 05/02/2012 01:22:35 PM
1013 Views
Brain waves at 8 weeks are a myth.
- 05/02/2012 08:46:06 PM
1115 Views
"brain function... appears to be reliably present in the fetus at about eight weeks' gestation."
- 05/02/2012 10:42:35 PM
1029 Views
Oh please.
- 05/02/2012 11:13:50 PM
997 Views
Re: Oh please yourself.
- 06/02/2012 09:15:26 PM
869 Views
Quite a telling reply.
- 07/02/2012 04:38:20 AM
936 Views
Re: I quite agree.
- 08/02/2012 06:03:23 PM
1142 Views
You're taking an issue of objective facts and treating it like a day of playground gossip.
- 09/02/2012 03:47:06 AM
977 Views
No, your source, in which there is very little that is objective, did that for me.
- 11/02/2012 02:59:45 AM
998 Views
I see you have continued to provide no factual arguments.
- 14/02/2012 04:53:28 AM
1240 Views
I presented factual rebuttals.
- 19/02/2012 01:56:45 AM
1032 Views
You continue to miss the point.
- 23/02/2012 10:22:24 PM
1120 Views
No, I got the point: You expect me to accept a heavily biased, partisan and combative "source."
- 07/03/2012 01:47:37 AM
1040 Views
The claim of brain waves at 8 weeks is still unsupported by evidence, i.e. a myth.
- 15/03/2012 09:16:14 PM
1079 Views
Well, yes.
- 04/02/2012 11:14:47 PM
1041 Views
A silent majority may as well not exist, if it has no tangible effects.
- 05/02/2012 12:54:34 AM
982 Views
You ignoring it is not the same thing as it having no tangible effect.
- 05/02/2012 02:11:36 AM
1078 Views
Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case.
- 04/02/2012 08:25:49 PM
1071 Views
Re: Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case.
- 05/02/2012 02:11:28 AM
974 Views
If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 05/02/2012 08:42:17 AM
815 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 05/02/2012 10:04:59 PM
982 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 06/02/2012 08:57:38 PM
955 Views
I'm done discussing my use of the term "oppression." The Tim Ryan stuff is interesting, though.
- 07/02/2012 05:37:05 AM
1056 Views
Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 08/02/2012 06:01:32 PM
1152 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 09/02/2012 05:30:58 AM
1017 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 11/02/2012 02:58:00 AM
1045 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 14/02/2012 04:29:08 AM
1109 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 19/02/2012 01:54:30 AM
1029 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 23/02/2012 10:59:32 PM
1325 Views
There are problems with the implants
- 03/02/2012 01:42:55 AM
1002 Views
Any form of birth control doesn't work for everyone, though.
- 03/02/2012 02:37:00 AM
1028 Views
Oh yes, I totally agree! My point is just that there are some barriers to handing out implants 
*NM*
- 03/02/2012 03:38:05 AM
473 Views
*NM*
- 03/02/2012 03:38:05 AM
473 Views
What on earth does that have to do with anything?
- 03/02/2012 01:47:42 AM
936 Views
I was actually kinda with you until you closed with that anathema I condemned in my response to rt.
- 03/02/2012 01:39:06 PM
964 Views
I agree that they have made Beast Cancer a cult but splitting with PP is just smart
- 02/02/2012 05:39:49 PM
1138 Views
I agree.
- 02/02/2012 06:00:17 PM
922 Views
yes she is going to have to piss off one group or the other
- 02/02/2012 06:12:31 PM
988 Views
Right
- 02/02/2012 06:24:14 PM
1037 Views
it is a judgment call and I hope her decision is based on more than my guesses
- 02/02/2012 06:53:50 PM
911 Views
Do you see a way Komen could have avoided pissing off one side?
- 02/02/2012 06:55:36 PM
986 Views
No, I don't. I don't believe I said that?
- 02/02/2012 07:53:50 PM
895 Views
You didn't; I inferred it from the way you phrased that ("if she HAS to..."). Sorry.
- 02/02/2012 08:06:11 PM
976 Views
I know I'm not always clear.
- 02/02/2012 08:32:47 PM
979 Views
- 02/02/2012 08:32:47 PM
979 Views
Just curious...
- 02/02/2012 10:07:49 PM
959 Views
Not at all.
- 02/02/2012 10:24:19 PM
1028 Views
Not at all?
- 02/02/2012 10:32:31 PM
919 Views
No.
- 02/02/2012 10:47:04 PM
873 Views
My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes
- 02/02/2012 11:17:24 PM
972 Views
Re: My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes
- 03/02/2012 12:08:01 AM
970 Views
wow that may be the worst advice I had in weeks
- 03/02/2012 12:13:18 AM
938 Views
- 03/02/2012 12:13:18 AM
938 Views
Ooor, the best.
- 03/02/2012 12:25:56 AM
912 Views
ok now you are just being mean *NM*
- 03/02/2012 12:46:12 AM
592 Views
The thread was going too well - I thought we needed the meanness. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 11:30:39 AM
541 Views
Never having heard of any of those except PP, my opinion may not be the most relevant...
- 02/02/2012 08:32:48 PM
1041 Views
You don't know stuff.
- 02/02/2012 08:43:38 PM
1006 Views
I know the stuff that matters. 
- 02/02/2012 09:55:08 PM
912 Views
- 02/02/2012 09:55:08 PM
912 Views
That's true.
- 02/02/2012 10:34:32 PM
1003 Views
they may also be a afraid that PP will go the way of ACORN
- 02/02/2012 11:04:16 PM
1053 Views
"Accused" of = unfounded slander.
- 03/02/2012 12:13:30 AM
1067 Views
did you notice I called tactic disgusting? That doesn't mean it isn't effective
- 03/02/2012 12:45:10 AM
996 Views
The investigation by Congress is well-known to be specious. It's the House GOP abusing their power. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 12:41:58 AM
649 Views
This is so foreign a debate for me
- 02/02/2012 10:16:15 PM
1025 Views
*NM*
Re: stuff
- 03/02/2012 09:18:53 AM
922 Views
I'm sorry, but what're we talking about when we're talking about "cancer"
- 03/02/2012 12:49:34 PM
956 Views
Obviously not adenocarcinoma, no.
- 04/02/2012 07:36:06 AM
969 Views
I"m not that fussed. I'm just generally leary of research that has results like that
- 04/02/2012 08:35:04 PM
915 Views
Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense.
- 02/02/2012 10:54:34 PM
1004 Views
Re: Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense.
- 02/02/2012 11:03:32 PM
933 Views
After a little more digging I have to say you are probably right.
- 03/02/2012 02:23:14 AM
867 Views
They restored funding incidentally
- 03/02/2012 05:43:47 PM
908 Views
Unless I've missed it
- 03/02/2012 05:56:15 PM
991 Views
You must have missed it then
- 03/02/2012 07:07:13 PM
907 Views
If you're referring to Cannoli
- 03/02/2012 07:19:25 PM
1061 Views
Multiple was not an accidental choice of words
- 03/02/2012 11:46:30 PM
938 Views
Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you.
- 04/02/2012 12:41:42 AM
974 Views
Re: Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you.
- 04/02/2012 01:53:25 AM
1162 Views
well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision
- 03/02/2012 06:24:14 PM
1102 Views
Re: well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision
- 03/02/2012 06:29:34 PM
884 Views
I do wonder a bit which lawmakers Fox thinks "pressured" Komen.
- 03/02/2012 08:29:50 PM
906 Views
Beyond the 26 senators, I'd imagine rumor of the more reliable sort
- 03/02/2012 08:46:31 PM
971 Views
Well, if they wrote AS senators rather than friends of Nancy Brinker, that probably qualifies.
- 03/02/2012 10:24:11 PM
1026 Views
Judge for yourself
- 04/02/2012 12:01:06 AM
1036 Views
Well, a public letter makes whether they signed it "Sen. so-and-so" irrelevant: It is political.
- 04/02/2012 04:07:20 PM
957 Views
are you trying to disprove the study you posted?
- 03/02/2012 09:20:12 PM
1035 Views
To me, it depends on the nature of the contact, which I have not dug enough to discover.
- 03/02/2012 10:43:45 PM
935 Views
you admit you have no incite into what happened
- 04/02/2012 04:27:17 AM
957 Views
Actually, it looks like Komens new VP (and former GOP GA gubernatorial candidate) had the incite.
- 04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM
1008 Views
- 04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM
1008 Views
educated guess don't work when you are tinfoil hat wearing kool-aid drinker
- 04/02/2012 09:33:49 PM
907 Views