Active Users:363 Time:05/04/2025 05:01:55 AM
Yes, they should, but, once again, that approach will not prevent a new law. Joel Send a noteboard - 18/01/2012 04:05:02 PM
i saw something that i cannot find a link to currently about how harry reid has been given something like $2.5 million from various groups in support of pipa. and other senators and congresscritters have gotten equally large sums of money to support these bills.

so, what the government SHOULD do is to stop pretending this bill is about piracy and just come out and call it the "Line our Pockets with Graft Act" instead. LOPGA doesn't quite have the same ring but at least it's being honest....

I am pretty sure Obama was not soliciting public comments like "kill this bill, do not pass any related ones, and stop taking corporate bribes!" But, y'know, good luck getting Congress to agree to that; their record is not terribly encouraging.

MEANWHILE, absent alternative legislation the point is moot; they WILL pass something, and if they only have one bill it will probably be that one.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
English Wikipedia Anti-SOPA Blackout - 17/01/2012 08:31:46 AM 2167 Views
Yeah, man, because currently copyright holders have no recourse, am I right? - 17/01/2012 11:47:35 AM 995 Views
"altering the infrastructure of the Internet so as to render RAFO virtually inaccessible"? - 17/01/2012 08:12:27 PM 1106 Views
I'll go ahead and ask before I get my panties in a bunch: do you understand these bills? - 17/01/2012 09:09:22 PM 1206 Views
I admit I have not looked into it much - 17/01/2012 11:42:30 PM 1052 Views
And yet you're still arguing the matter. - 18/01/2012 02:34:04 AM 1160 Views
I love you. *NM* - 18/01/2012 03:41:03 AM 658 Views
heh, thanks. I usually find myself pushing minority opinions. Nice to be "appreciated" for once. *NM* - 18/01/2012 04:01:10 AM 644 Views
Can i second the adulation? - 18/01/2012 04:07:17 AM 882 Views
I too (three?) appreciate the common sense and reasonable explanations. *NM* - 18/01/2012 04:12:59 AM 641 Views
Thanks guys. - 18/01/2012 04:39:00 AM 1056 Views
Right, because the argument is not just over THIS bill but, apparently, over ANY bill. - 18/01/2012 11:09:13 AM 1060 Views
Alternatives to SOPA/PIPA have been proposed for months now. Please stop arguing this. - 18/01/2012 05:42:10 PM 974 Views
That is really all I ask. - 18/01/2012 06:26:37 PM 1044 Views
"sensitive federal content"? Provide a source justifying this claim and it's relevance, please. - 18/01/2012 05:59:47 PM 1073 Views
I would not have thought a source necessary. - 18/01/2012 06:24:44 PM 1062 Views
Okay, I'm with Aemon now. - 18/01/2012 07:36:21 PM 1075 Views
OK. - 18/01/2012 10:16:16 PM 1105 Views
Surreal. It's like you're a spam-bot or something. *NM* - 19/01/2012 01:23:35 AM 778 Views
That was constructive. - 19/01/2012 03:29:53 PM 986 Views
Very nicely summarised. *NM* - 18/01/2012 02:06:02 AM 579 Views
should be interesting - 17/01/2012 12:41:47 PM 931 Views
Could be; depends on a lot of factors. - 17/01/2012 07:38:55 PM 1002 Views
See, that's one of the biggest problems that people aren't understanding. - 17/01/2012 09:31:38 PM 1008 Views
So tell them that. - 17/01/2012 11:54:19 PM 1161 Views
Could've done without the snide rejoinder, but, good. - 17/01/2012 02:20:08 PM 926 Views
I love the black banner, like some kind of internet Holocaust. - 17/01/2012 08:03:27 PM 1071 Views
Are you aware that SOPA/PIPA has nothing to do with hackers and everything to do with copyright? - 18/01/2012 02:08:56 AM 922 Views
There seems to be some overlap. - 18/01/2012 01:08:22 PM 1027 Views
Re: There seems to be some overlap. - 18/01/2012 08:13:15 PM 918 Views
Re: There still seems to be some overlap. - 18/01/2012 10:27:32 PM 1181 Views
Er, what Ghav said. - 18/01/2012 02:30:37 AM 939 Views
Sorry, protecting Pirate Bay and offshore gambling are not compelling counterarguments. - 18/01/2012 11:38:08 AM 991 Views
Okay, another analogy: - 18/01/2012 02:04:12 PM 933 Views
The devil is always in the details, and it seems clear the details need great revision. - 18/01/2012 03:31:20 PM 983 Views
what they SHOULD do is stop taking money from proponents of sopa/pipa - 18/01/2012 03:51:09 PM 1056 Views
Yes, they should, but, once again, that approach will not prevent a new law. - 18/01/2012 04:05:02 PM 1058 Views
Re: The devil is always in the details, and it seems clear the details need great revision. - 18/01/2012 04:27:30 PM 1018 Views
If the US government wants to summarily block sites within the US, it already can and will. - 18/01/2012 06:15:53 PM 957 Views
NO - you are still wrong on this point - 19/01/2012 02:38:14 AM 959 Views
Power, or authority? - 19/01/2012 03:41:24 PM 1036 Views
A technical examination of SOPA and PROTECT IP - 18/01/2012 08:32:44 AM 944 Views
"As a disclaimer, I am not a lawyer, I'm a sysadmin." - 18/01/2012 12:47:16 PM 1204 Views
wow, you are totally correct! - 18/01/2012 03:45:54 PM 943 Views
That is a separate issue. - 18/01/2012 04:01:24 PM 969 Views
Thank you for posting that. - 18/01/2012 03:09:07 PM 1008 Views
Wikipedia has already convinced me - 18/01/2012 03:26:01 PM 819 Views
Trying to stop this legislation without proposing an alternative is trying to stop ANY legislation. - 18/01/2012 03:44:18 PM 1048 Views
It isn't their job to propose legislation - 18/01/2012 04:12:53 PM 967 Views
No, but they have as much RIGHT to do so as anyone else. - 18/01/2012 05:31:55 PM 949 Views
Strike three. - 18/01/2012 05:37:55 PM 1008 Views
That is fine; that is what people SHOULD be doing. - 18/01/2012 06:03:59 PM 821 Views
Things being better now than they would be under SOPA seems like a legitimate argument to me - 18/01/2012 09:04:18 PM 1092 Views
Against SOPA, sure; against ANY new law, no. - 18/01/2012 10:46:48 PM 927 Views
Re: Against SOPA, sure; against ANY new law, no. - 19/01/2012 12:15:48 AM 1005 Views
That is a poor approach to drafting legislation, at best. - 19/01/2012 04:37:22 PM 1017 Views
About "proposing new legislation" - 18/01/2012 04:45:08 PM 1078 Views
So true - 18/01/2012 05:08:45 PM 1015 Views
Not to go off on a tangent about combatting piracy... - 18/01/2012 05:38:12 PM 935 Views
Entirely agree *NM* - 18/01/2012 06:13:13 PM 636 Views
That was an excellent post. *NM* - 19/01/2012 11:18:19 PM 616 Views
Re: About "proposing new legislation" - 18/01/2012 05:59:55 PM 1160 Views
For those who want a short, one page explanation... - 18/01/2012 05:41:49 PM 956 Views
Yeah, so I use Russian wikipedia for a day. Or German wikipedia, or French, or Italian... *NM* - 18/01/2012 06:23:36 PM 687 Views
We get it: You are a polyglot. - 18/01/2012 06:27:48 PM 945 Views
Or just hit stop right before the script runs. *NM* - 18/01/2012 06:52:40 PM 680 Views
Or just disable Java. *NM* - 19/01/2012 01:58:03 AM 548 Views
That's not as much fun though. *NM* - 19/01/2012 02:13:44 AM 674 Views
Exactly, this way its kind of a game. *NM* - 19/01/2012 02:20:37 AM 485 Views
Or Answers.com, or even the actual sources that are often copy/pasted into Wikipedia... - 19/01/2012 01:07:38 AM 1046 Views
They all did it on twitter - 19/01/2012 01:26:19 AM 979 Views
I was asleep much of the day - 19/01/2012 02:40:11 AM 1059 Views
Oh, no; now Congress will be inundated with complaints from lazy college students! - 19/01/2012 04:40:12 PM 1094 Views
13 previously unopposed senators now do not support SOPA. - 19/01/2012 11:36:15 PM 1048 Views
How does that "rebutt" what was a facetious post in the first place? - 20/01/2012 09:24:27 PM 1150 Views
a joke can, indeed, be rebutted... - 21/01/2012 09:07:32 PM 1040 Views
Oh, draggie, I ALWAYS see what you do there. - 21/01/2012 10:01:58 PM 1008 Views

Reply to Message