I think it is a big deal and fuss should be made of this.
Any time steps are taken to make it more difficult to vote people will effectively be disenfranchised. It is not a sign of a healthy democracy.
Any time steps are taken to make it more difficult to vote people will effectively be disenfranchised. It is not a sign of a healthy democracy.
<<WTCRAP not only did I not intend to edit the original post, but post a reply to it, but for some reason I can't access what I originally posted!!! GRR!!!>>
Recreated-sorta-OP: The article below goes over this law that South Carolina is trying to pass to require photo ID. The federal government is stepping in and being all "THIS WILL DISENFRANCHISE BLACK AND MINORITY VOTERS!!!" and South Carolina is getting pissy because it views this as a state's right law that the government is interfering with. I'm just struggling to see how this disenfranchies blacks/minorities.
EDIT: Okay, I chatted with my mom and she pointed out a few things. I think they're fair points.
1) The reaction to this law is somewhat understandable because it harkens back to the old Jim Crow laws and their effects, which aren't even out of the memories of the living.
2) The low income bracket that is likely representative of the minority demographics likely lives on a cash basis and therefore wouldn't necessarily have an ID for things like the bank. I didn't think about that.
3) The accessibility of the DMV is probably lacking, as well as the information regarding how one goes about acquiring a photo ID for free. I brought up public libraries, but my mom pointed out that many of the areas of relevance probably don't have readily accessible public libraries either.
With those considerations, I guess I can see where the federal government is coming from in regards to these people not having IDs and not being able to get them. It still seems like something that a compromise could be reached on, though. Maybe have ID centers besides the DMV? Opening up ID centers could provide jobs (if only a few) for those areas as well.
Recreated-sorta-OP: The article below goes over this law that South Carolina is trying to pass to require photo ID. The federal government is stepping in and being all "THIS WILL DISENFRANCHISE BLACK AND MINORITY VOTERS!!!" and South Carolina is getting pissy because it views this as a state's right law that the government is interfering with. I'm just struggling to see how this disenfranchies blacks/minorities.
EDIT: Okay, I chatted with my mom and she pointed out a few things. I think they're fair points.
1) The reaction to this law is somewhat understandable because it harkens back to the old Jim Crow laws and their effects, which aren't even out of the memories of the living.
2) The low income bracket that is likely representative of the minority demographics likely lives on a cash basis and therefore wouldn't necessarily have an ID for things like the bank. I didn't think about that.
3) The accessibility of the DMV is probably lacking, as well as the information regarding how one goes about acquiring a photo ID for free. I brought up public libraries, but my mom pointed out that many of the areas of relevance probably don't have readily accessible public libraries either.
With those considerations, I guess I can see where the federal government is coming from in regards to these people not having IDs and not being able to get them. It still seems like something that a compromise could be reached on, though. Maybe have ID centers besides the DMV? Opening up ID centers could provide jobs (if only a few) for those areas as well.
How does requiring photo ID disenfranchise the black/minority community?
15/01/2012 05:14:16 PM
- 1878 Views
From what I understand ...
15/01/2012 05:34:39 PM
- 991 Views
but you need a photo ID for so many other things
15/01/2012 05:42:06 PM
- 882 Views
Well.
15/01/2012 05:53:04 PM
- 1013 Views
The SCOTUS disagrees with you.
16/01/2012 03:14:57 AM
- 843 Views
I didn't even need to show a voter regestration card last time I voted *NM*
16/01/2012 11:45:23 PM
- 658 Views
That is kind of pathetic.
17/01/2012 06:45:19 AM
- 788 Views
It "disenfranchises" whoever only barely brings him- or herself to vote as it is.
15/01/2012 05:34:50 PM
- 886 Views
That really only reinforces the idea to me that this is just people looking to fight about something *NM*
15/01/2012 05:45:37 PM
- 497 Views
I think that's an exaggeration, but to play devil's advocate...
15/01/2012 05:41:10 PM
- 819 Views
it doesn't strike me as a very big layer to add. *NM*
15/01/2012 05:43:37 PM
- 497 Views
Someone presents a poll worker a non-DL photo ID.
15/01/2012 05:48:50 PM
- 887 Views
i suppose that would get complicated if you tried to make it nice and flexible. *NM*
15/01/2012 06:09:13 PM
- 715 Views
It doesn't, really. The issue gets politicized due to a long memory of "Jim Crow".
15/01/2012 06:19:37 PM
- 956 Views
Yah, my mom brought up Jim Crow laws. It's a fair point, at least in regards to the reaction
15/01/2012 06:22:36 PM
- 908 Views
This is a remarkably calm and reasonable political discussion. What's going on? *NM*
15/01/2012 08:05:30 PM
- 518 Views
It is not a black and white issue
16/01/2012 01:07:14 AM
- 905 Views
I prefer to think i'm magical. *NM*
16/01/2012 01:20:49 AM
- 507 Views
I don't see any cat nearby, thus no magic was used *nods* *NM*
16/01/2012 01:28:50 AM
- 534 Views
that's too obvious.
16/01/2012 02:48:29 AM
- 872 Views
You did not just compare a cat to a rabbit
16/01/2012 03:07:49 AM
- 890 Views
have you ever had a rabbit?
16/01/2012 03:25:26 AM
- 935 Views
A cat would never lower itself assumming the form of a fluffy rabbit
16/01/2012 12:49:26 PM
- 949 Views
that's just what they want you to think.
16/01/2012 02:34:48 PM
- 826 Views
Viscous does not mean Magical
16/01/2012 02:45:10 PM
- 1020 Views

Actually i'm pretty sure my rabbits scratch me because they're furry bastards. *NM*
16/01/2012 04:28:57 PM
- 519 Views
well for one thing she didn't start out by insulting people who disagree with her
16/01/2012 02:09:24 AM
- 864 Views
Not that I care much either way, but please, answer this:
15/01/2012 09:26:23 PM
- 949 Views
definitely not. However, ID cards are free in South Carolina.
15/01/2012 09:33:06 PM
- 1014 Views
You could walk. *NM*
16/01/2012 06:31:58 AM
- 507 Views
Oh I could, theoretically. Although this year, my poll is a good 7 miles away
16/01/2012 08:45:42 AM
- 1037 Views
7 miles away, isn't that illegal? *NM*
16/01/2012 05:35:50 PM
- 511 Views
probably, but not really at the same time. It's my own fault regardless.
16/01/2012 10:46:06 PM
- 938 Views
Illegal? My polling location is > 7 miles from my permanent residence.
17/01/2012 12:19:21 AM
- 884 Views
No, and there's is no place in the US that is the case
16/01/2012 12:11:36 AM
- 938 Views
It disenfranchises the dead/illegal aliens/people who vote multiple times...
16/01/2012 02:01:47 AM
- 927 Views
Short answer: Yes. (Let me know if you want the long answer.) *NM*
16/01/2012 07:52:36 PM
- 617 Views
that would be interesting. *NM*
16/01/2012 08:45:24 PM
- 524 Views
By that, I assume you want to know. (But probably not as interesting as you think.)
17/01/2012 02:46:16 PM
- 910 Views
I don't see how it does
15/01/2012 10:22:29 PM
- 959 Views
Re: I don't see how it does
15/01/2012 10:57:20 PM
- 890 Views
I believe most states also offer a non-drivers ID issued by the DMV
16/01/2012 12:12:09 AM
- 841 Views
Cool. I wonder if Canada has those. I should check into that. *NM*
16/01/2012 12:35:39 AM
- 449 Views
Also passports work too in most places. *NM*
16/01/2012 06:59:51 PM
- 541 Views
those are far far from economical or practical compared to state IDs *NM*
16/01/2012 07:12:30 PM
- 419 Views
It is a catch 22 situation, the free id is not a perfect solution
16/01/2012 12:53:11 AM
- 965 Views
Also you can't claim voter fraud is a big problem
16/01/2012 12:57:18 AM
- 889 Views
can you prove that voter fraud is not a problem?
16/01/2012 02:04:52 AM
- 846 Views
In 5 years of investigation, 120 people were charged national with voter fraud, 86 were convincted
16/01/2012 02:33:07 AM
- 1069 Views
That's smoke and mirrors
16/01/2012 01:51:34 PM
- 961 Views
It seems you didn't read the article, or understand its point
16/01/2012 02:39:39 PM
- 900 Views
You are still ignoring the fact that it is almost impossible to catch people on the current system
16/01/2012 03:52:42 PM
- 843 Views
I suspect I know a good deal more of this subject than the author of your 5-year old article
16/01/2012 05:37:54 PM
- 901 Views
Question for you
16/01/2012 06:01:09 PM
- 942 Views
I'd prefer photo-ID only but I don't see too great a need.
16/01/2012 06:37:13 PM
- 1083 Views
becuase they would then be limited to voting once and all of ACRON's work would be wasted *NM*
16/01/2012 01:46:06 AM
- 596 Views
Not to mention it might stop some of those pesky dead people that keep showing up. Every Year. *NM*
16/01/2012 02:44:42 PM
- 547 Views
Hey now. Zombies are people too, and deserve to have their opinions noted. *NM*
17/01/2012 10:23:15 PM
- 519 Views
I guess you havn't been watching the Walking Dead *NM*
18/01/2012 07:09:34 PM
- 539 Views
Nate's one of those Farmer Hershel types. *NM*
18/01/2012 10:02:48 PM
- 522 Views
Just a guess but I don't think things will end well for the farmer *NM*
19/01/2012 07:09:45 PM
- 552 Views
If provided gratis, it does not; otherwise, it is a poll tax (illegal under federal law.)
16/01/2012 02:39:40 AM
- 790 Views
Re: How does requiring photo ID disenfranchise the black/minority community?
16/01/2012 02:42:28 PM
- 885 Views
I do think that fraud/raising barriers to vote need to be weighed against each other.
16/01/2012 06:20:23 PM
- 917 Views
I remember the Bush/Gore Fiasco back in 2000, Florida and Democrats pissed off the overseas military
16/01/2012 06:56:39 PM
- 893 Views
I'm not reading the article but...
17/01/2012 09:48:27 AM
- 876 Views
maybe there's no excuse in your area
17/01/2012 03:05:53 PM
- 819 Views
I think when you get to such extreme examples, the point often becomes moot.
18/01/2012 07:26:10 PM
- 807 Views
Re: I think when you get to such extreme examples, the point often becomes moot.
21/01/2012 02:44:56 AM
- 1072 Views
What? I'm the only one who cares?
18/01/2012 02:14:28 AM
- 1020 Views
Yes, just you, the rest of us have been discussing baseball this entire time *NM*
18/01/2012 02:41:25 AM
- 530 Views
I'm the only one who cares with fervor in a non nuanced way ok? *NM*
18/01/2012 03:07:07 AM
- 520 Views
imo, fervor has no place in political discussion
18/01/2012 02:35:56 PM
- 876 Views
And yet, it finds its way or it's not politics.
18/01/2012 06:28:08 PM
- 871 Views
That doesn't mean that's the best or most productive discussion manner
18/01/2012 06:59:09 PM
- 1006 Views

Strong feelings on a topic don't have to translate to fervent discussion, all caps style.
18/01/2012 08:50:45 PM
- 945 Views
What?
18/01/2012 03:57:10 PM
- 802 Views
What about those who don't have an id and have been voting fine before?
18/01/2012 06:06:19 PM
- 1028 Views
the problem with that last point is...
18/01/2012 09:05:43 PM
- 863 Views
Yes.
18/01/2012 09:32:25 PM
- 1034 Views
That example is a lot different to what I'm talking about though.
18/01/2012 10:51:21 PM
- 911 Views
It's not that different and it's a concrete example of something that happened quite recently.
18/01/2012 11:43:24 PM
- 1110 Views
What's your real question?
18/01/2012 05:07:30 PM
- 841 Views
Question mark notwithstanding, there was no question.
18/01/2012 06:16:46 PM
- 942 Views
Be outraged. Be passionate. Be surprised.
19/01/2012 05:42:37 PM
- 1078 Views
I've had enough, looking forward to insulting everyone again in a couple months or so.
19/01/2012 06:06:19 PM
- 956 Views