Active Users:419 Time:26/04/2025 02:32:37 PM
while I, of course, disagree with your conclusion. ranagrande Send a noteboard - 10/01/2012 02:21:46 PM
For every idea of his that is acceptable or even attractive to any particular group in American politics, he has two that said group would find absolutely unacceptable. He doesn't want to become president bad enough to abandon his principles, which of course is one of the things so many people admire about his candidacy - but it also means he's not actually a candidate to be President. He just wants to promote his ideas, and he certainly has a lot more influence this way than he'd have through his House seat alone.

Why would that mean he's not actually a candidate? He would have vastly greater influence still to promote his ideas as President.

So to sum up, it's not gonna happen, and you wouldn't like it if it did (although Paul becoming president would definitely be one of the most exciting political experiments in recent history: how much would he actually change, and what would the consequences be? It's just only a madman would want to volunteer his country for said experiment.)

It could happen. After Iowa, there's a three-way tie for first place between Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, and Ron Paul. With very few votes counted so far in New Hampshire, Paul is a close second to Romney there too.

If by some miracle Ron Paul does get the republican nomination, I think he goes on to become President. (For the record, if by an even greater miracle Jon Huntsman were to be the republican nominee, the general election will be a contest too close for me to call. If it's anyone else: Perry, Gingrich, Santorum, or Romney, than Barack Obama will serve a second term.)

And if it did happen, then yes, I think I would like it very much. I don't completely agree with Ron Paul on everything, but he comes much, much closer than any other candidate in any other party. Unlike with most candidates, and unlike our current President, chances are good that Paul will actually do, or at least try to do, what he says he will. He has a long congressional record to use as evidence: in all his time in the House, he has never voted to raise taxes and he has never voted to go to war.

As you say, it would be exciting to see how many of his ideas he could actually implement, how people would respond to them, and what the results ultimately were. I shall gladly volunteer my country for this experiment, and I'm not a madman. In fact, the last time I took psychiatric exam, the doctor said I was one of the "most classically normal" people he'd seen. Anyway, Paul's theories are sound and any changes he is able to make are sure to be improvements. He certainly couldn't be any worse than Bush or Obama.
Reply to message
Santorum is #2 in Iowa - 04/01/2012 01:24:13 PM 1814 Views
would you stop using that word? It is gross. *NM* - 04/01/2012 01:48:45 PM 610 Views
What's your word for it? *NM* - 04/01/2012 03:43:44 PM 551 Views
Rövsmör. *NM* - 04/01/2012 09:50:21 PM 551 Views
Den var ny för mig. - 06/01/2012 12:12:07 AM 752 Views
yeah that it so funny - 04/01/2012 03:05:59 PM 999 Views
he kind of brought it on himself by being so decidedly anti-gay that it pissed lots of people off - 04/01/2012 04:36:39 PM 1046 Views
maybe the gays brought all the gay bashing on themselves - 05/01/2012 03:18:15 PM 1259 Views
Civility is a social contract - 05/01/2012 04:39:46 PM 1014 Views
so now that the gays have broken that contract they are fair game? - 05/01/2012 06:37:52 PM 757 Views
Question have you read the Santorum interview? *NM* - 05/01/2012 06:50:24 PM 514 Views
no I try to avoid him - 06/01/2012 06:17:45 PM 867 Views
That's too harsh. - 06/01/2012 07:29:05 PM 982 Views
While language changes with time - 07/01/2012 04:13:28 AM 998 Views
I have to agree. Reluctantly. - 04/01/2012 06:19:13 PM 1042 Views
Actually, your response was expected - 04/01/2012 10:08:33 PM 1102 Views
don't forget.... - 05/01/2012 02:27:49 AM 989 Views
do you still pretend that it isn't political? - 05/01/2012 03:14:25 PM 913 Views
I'm sorry - 05/01/2012 03:52:57 PM 1047 Views
funny how it always woks out that way - 05/01/2012 06:44:55 PM 849 Views
Believe what you will, but my wok skills are poor - 05/01/2012 07:32:17 PM 1007 Views
You should ask one of the gays to help you. I hear the gays are good at cooking. *NM* - 06/01/2012 01:54:21 AM 642 Views
Queer stove eye for the straight guy? - 06/01/2012 09:05:48 PM 910 Views
try using more heat and better oil *NM* - 06/01/2012 06:18:19 PM 531 Views
Corn oil? - 06/01/2012 09:05:09 PM 861 Views
Peanut *NM* - 06/01/2012 11:27:49 PM 581 Views
Santorum is a man who believes you must compare homosexual love to bestiality and pedophilia - 05/01/2012 04:42:26 AM 1016 Views
and Savage is a Man who believes that vulgar personal attacks - 05/01/2012 03:12:42 PM 1163 Views
Why should a person tolerate intolerance? (Serious question.) *NM* - 05/01/2012 08:46:05 PM 676 Views
The question boils down to why should someone tolerate what they think is wrong. - 05/01/2012 10:53:40 PM 988 Views
and when santorum tells you that your lifestyle is worse than pedophilia and bestiality? - 06/01/2012 03:34:52 AM 927 Views
To be fair... - 06/01/2012 05:32:31 AM 1068 Views
You are correct - 06/01/2012 01:21:18 PM 1119 Views
Then it seems like it's a problem of definitions more than anything else. - 06/01/2012 09:48:49 PM 1042 Views
Following the logic to its bitter end. Why do I do this to myself??? - 06/01/2012 10:14:01 PM 1104 Views
Santourm is - 07/01/2012 04:24:45 AM 1046 Views
I'm fairly sure your theory is wrong. - 06/01/2012 10:42:14 PM 1106 Views
so Obama offended me by attending a racist America hating church - 06/01/2012 05:32:14 PM 959 Views
Those are really not equivalent. - 06/01/2012 04:18:37 PM 896 Views
Re: Those are really not equivalent. - 06/01/2012 10:27:11 PM 1024 Views
This. - 07/01/2012 01:35:43 PM 915 Views
I agree, lets shoot anyone who doesn't think like you *NM* - 06/01/2012 05:17:41 PM 530 Views
I'm really conflicted about the whole Santorum thing. - 06/01/2012 07:42:02 PM 979 Views
I find myself agreeing with you recently - 06/01/2012 08:38:37 PM 1005 Views
dude, gross! *NM* - 04/01/2012 04:39:34 PM 538 Views
Dear Iowa, - 04/01/2012 08:04:09 PM 1019 Views
So at this point, most of the candidates had a moment at the top. Kind of awesome. - 05/01/2012 11:22:50 PM 998 Views
that is why Perry is staying in the race - 06/01/2012 06:20:54 PM 966 Views
It would be the joke of the year if Huntsman got a turn. - 06/01/2012 10:59:36 PM 916 Views
Is he a bigger long shot than Santorum, though? Gingrich? Bachman? CAIN!? - 07/01/2012 01:34:47 AM 1031 Views
Yes, for the reason you state. - 07/01/2012 03:04:39 PM 991 Views
I really do not agree. - 09/01/2012 08:51:46 PM 1012 Views
he is moving up in New Hampshire - 10/01/2012 05:16:14 PM 1105 Views
More like everyone has had a moment running second to Romney. - 07/01/2012 01:59:25 PM 913 Views
It's not a foregone conclusion yet. - 07/01/2012 04:03:51 PM 1026 Views
give up the hope it is nothing more than a pipe dream - 09/01/2012 02:57:03 PM 1027 Views
All of the republican candidates are pipe dreams. - 09/01/2012 08:56:57 PM 834 Views
I find Ron Paul absolutely infuriating. - 09/01/2012 10:44:09 PM 1099 Views
Weed is kinda important - 10/01/2012 03:31:00 PM 880 Views
So is women's health. About 50% of US. *NM* - 13/01/2012 01:46:15 AM 586 Views
Um... - 10/01/2012 03:54:53 PM 937 Views
is an ass - 10/01/2012 05:10:09 PM 1062 Views
I would like to see that enforced. - 10/01/2012 05:39:22 PM 1408 Views
So segregation when done by private businesses is ok? - 11/01/2012 02:20:32 PM 1123 Views
Define "OK." - 11/01/2012 08:29:09 PM 987 Views
Paul is an equal opportunity infuriator, to borrow Vivien's word. - 09/01/2012 10:56:57 PM 989 Views
I agree with you completely. - 10/01/2012 12:06:19 PM 1023 Views
while I, of course, disagree with your conclusion. - 10/01/2012 02:21:46 PM 1452 Views
Re: while I, of course, disagree with your conclusion. - 10/01/2012 07:38:39 PM 1012 Views
Ron Paul's biggest problem is isn't a republican - 10/01/2012 04:18:16 PM 1014 Views

Reply to Message