Active Users:522 Time:25/11/2024 07:50:26 PM
A tangent is not a non sequitur, though in this case I do not feel guilty of either. Joel Send a noteboard - 23/11/2011 08:12:09 AM
And maybe after that I will win the lottery.

Joel you are the king of trying to paint a group by the actions of one person (which you typically misstate). I really have no interest in looking up your post about the tea party just to have you ignore it and go into a rant about the 10974 election and something some aid to a senator supposedly said in 1986. Joel you are constantly bring up examples to prove the Right is violent or hate filled based on something something shouted at a convention or something some talk show host I have never heard of said. You are a whore complaining that the other whores will do anything for money.

Feel free to cite an example of me doing any of the things you allege (not that I have ever gone around quoting every obscure talk show host, but since I have been out of the States for a year you will probably have to go farther back than that.) Isaac did dig up one of my quotations of Lee Atwater describing how the GOP developed the Southern Strategy to such great effect in the '60s and evolved it over the next two decades so it remained effective, but that is hardly "something some aid to a senator supposedly said." It is a well documented statement by the former RNC Chairman who ran Bush 41s election campaign, during which he successfully tried to "make Willie Horton [Dukakis'] running mate." I am grateful Atwater finally had the grace and honesty to regret that and admit "it makes me sound racist" (even if it took an imminent meeting with his Maker to convince him,) but disappointed you apparently feel politically obligated to pretend it never happened, or does not matter if it did. Perhaps that is the greatest reason not to even momentarily indulge hatred as a leader: Because even when a leader subsequently admits and repudiates the momentary hatred many of his followers will still consider it acceptable.

Bottom line is that when a groups leaders spew that filth and the group applauds and shouts for more, yes, it implicates the group. That, and that I have been expecting OWS to get ugly for many of the reasons the Tea Party often has (which have nothing to do with politics and everything to do with character and humanity,) is why I have tried to keep my distance from OWS: I anticipate the leaders and/or much of the members of OWS doing something reprehensible and do not want to lend any support to it. I sympathize with many (though not all) of their GOALS, but virtually none of their tactics. In that respect, your blanket criticism of OWS has merit: When people who are not violent anarchists join those who are at rallies led by those who are, they group themselves with violent anarchist and risk receiving the same response. It is nigh impossible for a cop with blood streaming into his eyes from a thrown rock to tell the difference between the peaceful protester and the violent rock throwing radical standing beside him; they all get tear gassed and thrown in the paddy wagon together, for good reason.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
An Open Letter to Police Officers Across America - 20/11/2011 03:27:46 AM 1302 Views
Stupid, Stupid, Stupid. - 20/11/2011 03:59:42 AM 778 Views
I am forced to agree. - 20/11/2011 04:37:07 AM 613 Views
You're right, but stuff like what just happened at UC Davis makes my blood boil - 20/11/2011 05:52:11 AM 597 Views
As such things go, that does not seem too bad to me. - 20/11/2011 06:14:54 AM 776 Views
You do know that they initiated violence at Kent State, right? - 20/11/2011 02:45:57 PM 586 Views
You really do make this too easy. - 21/11/2011 10:28:31 PM 829 Views
hear hear *NM* - 20/11/2011 04:47:12 AM 277 Views
Agreed. - 20/11/2011 06:28:18 AM 730 Views
I agree with everything you said in this post. *NM* - 20/11/2011 07:53:07 AM 245 Views
a little late for that - 21/11/2011 01:54:34 PM 528 Views
What the fuck are you on? I need to get some of that. *NM* - 20/11/2011 04:56:00 AM 291 Views
I'm going to start a counter protest with "Bring back the Pinkertons" signs... - 20/11/2011 05:19:19 AM 565 Views
*NM* - 20/11/2011 05:49:35 AM 353 Views
I seen some guys holding signs saying "occupy a desk" *NM* - 21/11/2011 01:55:38 PM 304 Views
One of the most poorly written pieces of shit I've read in a long time. *NM* - 20/11/2011 06:30:29 AM 353 Views
"unarmed and peaceful protestors" - 20/11/2011 01:15:47 PM 612 Views
armed and violent? really? *NM* - 21/11/2011 05:31:44 PM 271 Views
Declaring people "enemy combatants" means they get to treat you as such too. - 20/11/2011 01:55:51 PM 580 Views
Don't cloud the propaganda with logic, Tim! - 20/11/2011 04:16:05 PM 612 Views
That's the problem with a two-party system: it's practically impossible to form a new party. *NM* - 20/11/2011 05:42:39 PM 249 Views
I think that's completely wrong. - 20/11/2011 06:10:15 PM 650 Views
The odds are very long. - 20/11/2011 07:15:54 PM 719 Views
And implicit in my statement above is the following addendum - 20/11/2011 06:14:40 PM 738 Views
I agree with that. However, many seem to think that means it's OK to beat them up. - 20/11/2011 06:21:05 PM 607 Views
Only if they resist arrest, and then the force must be proportionate. *NM* - 20/11/2011 09:52:39 PM 273 Views
If they resist a lawful arrest, sure. *NM* - 21/11/2011 11:11:11 AM 266 Views
they are breaking the law so it is lawful to arrest them *NM* - 21/11/2011 10:46:18 PM 262 Views
In what way? - 22/11/2011 09:12:01 AM 589 Views
Resisting arrest. Duh. *NM* - 22/11/2011 10:11:04 AM 270 Views
You are not allowed to just block sidewalks and camp wherever you want - 22/11/2011 01:54:42 PM 566 Views
In that case I quite agree. - 22/11/2011 02:08:02 PM 541 Views
Its still okay to beat communists up though right? *NM* - 21/11/2011 11:27:14 AM 259 Views
(OWS isn't anti-capitalism) - 20/11/2011 06:39:37 PM 528 Views
Why are liberals such whiners? - 21/11/2011 01:51:03 PM 759 Views
There you go again.... - 21/11/2011 11:05:04 PM 684 Views
it is a little hypocritical of the guy who called the Tea Party racsit to talk about broad brushes *NM* - 22/11/2011 04:02:56 AM 358 Views
One of these days you should try responding to me with more than "that thing you just said? YOU!" - 22/11/2011 06:11:20 AM 517 Views
one of these days you will respond without going into off topic rants - 22/11/2011 02:02:46 PM 783 Views
A tangent is not a non sequitur, though in this case I do not feel guilty of either. - 23/11/2011 08:12:09 AM 686 Views
I think you might be techincally correct - 22/11/2011 03:04:00 PM 720 Views
More than technically, in my obviously subjective opinion. - 23/11/2011 07:41:08 AM 555 Views
You've posted this, but you don't seem inclined to defend it, one might ask what the point was? - 21/11/2011 05:16:13 PM 521 Views
He'd post, but this is what happened. - 22/11/2011 03:55:43 AM 496 Views
I'm actually calling for them to start using lethal force. *NM* - 22/11/2011 03:46:24 AM 303 Views

Reply to Message