Active Users:523 Time:25/11/2024 07:58:05 PM
In what way? Tim Send a noteboard - 22/11/2011 09:12:01 AM
I'm not saying they aren't; I don't know. But all the discussion so far as focused on their status as "protesters", and protesting is not only legal but protected under your Constitution. If some, or even most, of the protesters are doing something else that's illegal, then I have no problem with them being arrested, but that's not a reason to disturb the others. Is there something they're all doing that's illegal?
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.

—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.

—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
Reply to message
An Open Letter to Police Officers Across America - 20/11/2011 03:27:46 AM 1302 Views
Stupid, Stupid, Stupid. - 20/11/2011 03:59:42 AM 778 Views
I am forced to agree. - 20/11/2011 04:37:07 AM 613 Views
You're right, but stuff like what just happened at UC Davis makes my blood boil - 20/11/2011 05:52:11 AM 598 Views
As such things go, that does not seem too bad to me. - 20/11/2011 06:14:54 AM 777 Views
You do know that they initiated violence at Kent State, right? - 20/11/2011 02:45:57 PM 586 Views
You really do make this too easy. - 21/11/2011 10:28:31 PM 829 Views
hear hear *NM* - 20/11/2011 04:47:12 AM 278 Views
Agreed. - 20/11/2011 06:28:18 AM 730 Views
I agree with everything you said in this post. *NM* - 20/11/2011 07:53:07 AM 245 Views
a little late for that - 21/11/2011 01:54:34 PM 529 Views
What the fuck are you on? I need to get some of that. *NM* - 20/11/2011 04:56:00 AM 291 Views
I'm going to start a counter protest with "Bring back the Pinkertons" signs... - 20/11/2011 05:19:19 AM 565 Views
*NM* - 20/11/2011 05:49:35 AM 353 Views
I seen some guys holding signs saying "occupy a desk" *NM* - 21/11/2011 01:55:38 PM 304 Views
One of the most poorly written pieces of shit I've read in a long time. *NM* - 20/11/2011 06:30:29 AM 353 Views
"unarmed and peaceful protestors" - 20/11/2011 01:15:47 PM 612 Views
armed and violent? really? *NM* - 21/11/2011 05:31:44 PM 271 Views
Declaring people "enemy combatants" means they get to treat you as such too. - 20/11/2011 01:55:51 PM 580 Views
Don't cloud the propaganda with logic, Tim! - 20/11/2011 04:16:05 PM 612 Views
That's the problem with a two-party system: it's practically impossible to form a new party. *NM* - 20/11/2011 05:42:39 PM 249 Views
I think that's completely wrong. - 20/11/2011 06:10:15 PM 650 Views
The odds are very long. - 20/11/2011 07:15:54 PM 720 Views
And implicit in my statement above is the following addendum - 20/11/2011 06:14:40 PM 738 Views
I agree with that. However, many seem to think that means it's OK to beat them up. - 20/11/2011 06:21:05 PM 607 Views
Only if they resist arrest, and then the force must be proportionate. *NM* - 20/11/2011 09:52:39 PM 273 Views
If they resist a lawful arrest, sure. *NM* - 21/11/2011 11:11:11 AM 266 Views
they are breaking the law so it is lawful to arrest them *NM* - 21/11/2011 10:46:18 PM 263 Views
In what way? - 22/11/2011 09:12:01 AM 590 Views
Resisting arrest. Duh. *NM* - 22/11/2011 10:11:04 AM 270 Views
You are not allowed to just block sidewalks and camp wherever you want - 22/11/2011 01:54:42 PM 566 Views
In that case I quite agree. - 22/11/2011 02:08:02 PM 541 Views
Its still okay to beat communists up though right? *NM* - 21/11/2011 11:27:14 AM 260 Views
(OWS isn't anti-capitalism) - 20/11/2011 06:39:37 PM 529 Views
You've posted this, but you don't seem inclined to defend it, one might ask what the point was? - 21/11/2011 05:16:13 PM 521 Views
He'd post, but this is what happened. - 22/11/2011 03:55:43 AM 496 Views
I'm actually calling for them to start using lethal force. *NM* - 22/11/2011 03:46:24 AM 303 Views

Reply to Message