Active Users:1127 Time:22/11/2024 04:06:33 PM
That's just wrong, factually in error from the get go Isaac Send a noteboard - 03/11/2011 09:47:28 PM
I cannot recall an instance of a corporation lobbying for the government to have more power; their record is one of lobbying for just the opposite.


Corporations regularly support regulations and lobby for news ones, sometimes with the best of motives too... even barring obvious good/bad like pushing for a new regulation that might constrain competitors, a coal, solar, or nuclear power corporation might cheerfully encourage and lobby for noise/safety regulation on windmills, and they as a group minus coal might be only too happy to favor carbon taxes and restrictions, minus coal. Various light bulb manufacturers can and have pressed for restrictions on classic bulbs in favor of CFL and raised dread specters and pushed for regulation on LEDs as some contain tiny amounts of lead. A paper recycling plant might favor and lobby for increased restrictions on timber harvesting, ditto can recyclers on the mining industry, as in both cases their own cost remain the same but their products are more competitive. Clothing, shoes, building materials all have various alternatives which might be considered more or less 'green' and increased regulation of that nature allows those in say, cotton or wool, to be more competitive with synthetic fibers or even leather, with cows farting so much carbon. I can cite you examples if you'd like, though I tihnk you'd concede the point as common sense. Even companies who will themselves, as opposed to their competitors, be hit with a regulation might favor it if they can raise their prices initially to cover the new fees then streamline compliance and never get around to lowering prices appropriately, "Oh, your phone bill will cost $2.00 more a month for compliance with regs" and down the line as they streamline that cost to, say, $1.50, keep that fifty cents or benefit as a smaller competitor who streamlines can't cut down below, say, $1.75, becomes less competitive... so yes corporations often do favor regulation increases. Nor would this always be sinister, some company with ethics might replant trees after they harvest them and take efforts to minimize ecological damage and soil erosion, voluntarily or because of local regs, but a competitor of theirs with less ethics or less restrictions might not, and they'd naturally favor regs requiring the same efforts they put in, particularly since they'd have already streamlined compliance and their competitor will likely see a large temporary cost increase above what they themselves pay to comply.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Great visual summary of the differences between the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street - 31/10/2011 02:59:18 PM 859 Views
I hear OSWers suggest dumping the Constitution about as often as Tea Partiers suggest fixing govt. - 31/10/2011 08:01:39 PM 642 Views
That's a touch questionable - 31/10/2011 09:49:09 PM 588 Views
The subject line? I disagree (obviously. ) - 31/10/2011 11:23:57 PM 749 Views
Re: The subject line? I disagree (obviously. ) - 01/11/2011 12:29:50 AM 738 Views
Re: The subject line? I disagree (obviously. ) - 11/11/2011 08:29:52 AM 773 Views
I think that this image actually is the best- short and to the point - 01/11/2011 01:24:23 AM 630 Views
LIKE *NM* - 01/11/2011 01:46:22 AM 190 Views
Very, very good. *NM* - 01/11/2011 12:01:17 PM 210 Views
I like that one. *NM* - 01/11/2011 12:54:45 PM 210 Views
I disagree. - 03/11/2011 08:44:54 PM 521 Views
That's just wrong, factually in error from the get go - 03/11/2011 09:47:28 PM 536 Views

Reply to Message