Active Users:3612 Time:22/01/2025 05:48:44 PM
Re: The trouble is ... Nate Send a noteboard - 31/10/2011 02:52:44 PM
That is why I said a Pento, not a chat admin. There were more than one admin. And yes, I suppose it would have to be someone Ben was willing to trust. Although I am sure a disclaimer could solve a potential legal problem. There could be admins under this particular person, but that person, not Ben, would deal with the (possible) bitching.


At that point it sounds like you have the exact same system that failed so spectacularly on wotmania. If Ben did choose someone to be the overseer and ultimate authority of chat, like Pento it would have to be someone who didn't give a rat's ass about criticism and who also couldn't care less if he offended any of the chat users with his actions. I would also suggest it would have to be someone who didn't participate whatsoever in chat, to avoid entanglement in the very conflict/drama that had to be resolved.

I would like to believe we are able to act sensibly, but you are probably right.


Some can. Some seem incapable. And when the brown stuff hits the fan, a lot of those who can become people who can't.

I think it would help the site grow. I was not a frequent chat user either, but I enjoyed the stuff that spilt out of chat and on to the boards. Except the Amy/Urza stuff, which was just boring (and nothing is worse than boring drama).


The only thing I hated more than chat posts were troll posts. :p

And even if you resolved all of this effectively, there are still the time and money factors ...
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
Hey Ben? Um...I hate being a pain in the ass but - 30/10/2011 10:15:28 PM 1295 Views
Probably - 30/10/2011 10:23:00 PM 795 Views
Lets be honest - 30/10/2011 10:31:01 PM 865 Views
Then don't moderate the chatroom. - 31/10/2011 12:12:05 AM 837 Views
I don't see that helping anything. *NM* - 31/10/2011 03:05:08 AM 428 Views
Re: Lets be honest - 31/10/2011 06:04:03 AM 999 Views
Re: Lets be honest - 31/10/2011 07:16:03 AM 842 Views
Very true - 31/10/2011 09:32:35 AM 772 Views
That may be beyond Taylor's capabilities *NM* - 31/10/2011 03:57:40 PM 403 Views
right back at ya bro haha *NM* - 01/11/2011 04:26:56 AM 541 Views
Or asses. Just sayin' - 01/11/2011 01:18:21 AM 779 Views
I'm in favor of this - 31/10/2011 12:56:41 AM 839 Views
The way I see it ... - 31/10/2011 03:09:37 AM 845 Views
Entirely agree *NM* - 31/10/2011 10:49:46 AM 369 Views
Solution - 31/10/2011 12:57:54 PM 856 Views
The trouble is ... - 31/10/2011 02:36:53 PM 825 Views
Re: The trouble is ... - 31/10/2011 02:44:15 PM 787 Views
Re: The trouble is ... - 31/10/2011 02:52:44 PM 773 Views
Re: The trouble is ... - 31/10/2011 02:58:06 PM 1028 Views
Re: The trouble is ... - 01/11/2011 01:21:37 AM 737 Views
Agreed *NM* - 31/10/2011 06:39:28 AM 388 Views
You can always do AIM. - 31/10/2011 10:27:13 PM 788 Views
There is the Invite Only chat. Very restrictive. - 01/11/2011 01:26:58 AM 806 Views
I didn't want to be in your racist chat anyway. *NM* - 01/11/2011 02:52:54 AM 374 Views
What if we added a separate Canadian drinking fountain? - 01/11/2011 11:36:16 PM 749 Views
While you are at it... - 02/11/2011 01:17:33 PM 742 Views
*NM* - 02/11/2011 11:00:21 PM 360 Views
There was that one time though... - 01/11/2011 12:21:08 PM 737 Views
You paint a very rockin' picture... even if Minnesotans are just slightly warmer Canadians. *NM* - 01/11/2011 11:37:58 PM 378 Views
Hey!!! Well, that's true... though it hasn't snowed here YET. - 02/11/2011 01:16:43 PM 729 Views
And it better not any time soon *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:38:59 PM 388 Views
Why not an IRC channel? - 01/11/2011 02:02:42 AM 753 Views
I've been advocating this for quite literally years now. *NM* - 01/11/2011 12:06:29 PM 371 Views
Yeah, some of us liked the drama threads *NM* - 01/11/2011 06:39:38 PM 394 Views
Hi you! - 14/11/2011 04:01:15 AM 779 Views

Reply to Message