Doesn't it bother you that his response to the fact that independent analysis of his 999 plan shows most that most Americans would see a tax increase is that you shouldn't trust those independent analysis but go to his web page and look at his analysis? Couple that with the fact that he won't tell you who did his analysis and I am concerned. His foreign policy credentials worry me as well. He has tried to walk it back but he did say he would trade the prisoners in Gitmo for a US soldier but he should have known better than to say it in the first place. I don't know if we can run a guy that gaff prone against the media darling.
I think it will be Romney though. Perry just sucks to much at debate and the rest have no money and no infrastructure to take on Romney. Odd that with the rise of the Tea Party we will get the most liberal republican nominee in decades.
I think it will be Romney though. Perry just sucks to much at debate and the rest have no money and no infrastructure to take on Romney. Odd that with the rise of the Tea Party we will get the most liberal republican nominee in decades.
Not really, I don't believe anyone has actually done an "Independent Analysis" of the plan yet, TPC says it has and the media likes to claim that TPC is non-partisan, which is utter bull... and they are the same group that has previously given glowing reviews to Obama's 'tax cuts and potential growth that would result from them back in 2008. That doesn't mean Cain's analysis is unbiased obviously, but I'm waiting to see it scored by some actual conservative or libertarian think tanks who have done it in depth, and last I checked all were still doing introductory analysis after having only brushed it lightly prior to about a week ago when his numbers surged... and I think people are currently trying to decide if certain aspects of it might be considered VAT tax. I withhold all judgment until various sources I trust have had a chance to really dig into it... I don't actually care who did his analysis either, since Cain is a mathematician himself I expect him to have verified the math and will hold him to account if the math is bad, but I won't really buy into an "Analysis" people offer prior to around Mid-November, because this sort of plan has heavy feedback effects and I expect to hear people arguing about it before I'll care what they say.
As for foreign policy, well, he has no foreign policy creds, but almost nobody does and I don't think the public cares right now, not that they care most times anyway, 100% economy. I worry about gaffes, media being what it is, but the Gitmo rollback didn't bug me too much and I'm contrasting him with Romney and Gingrich and Perry, where gaffes are the lesser of evils where shortcomings are concerned. I'm not on the Cain Bandwagon yet, and probably won't be, but he's someone that for the moment I'm okay with and might even become an exciting candidate.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
So I am curious. What do our site conservatives think of Cain?
18/10/2011 09:35:47 AM
- 913 Views
I have trouble taking him seriously
18/10/2011 01:59:23 PM
- 610 Views
That is the problem with all Romneys opponents.
18/10/2011 03:32:50 PM
- 620 Views
what positions of Perry's do you consider radical?
18/10/2011 03:56:30 PM
- 512 Views
Well, abolishing Social Security is pretty far out there, and publicly threatening the Fed Chairman.
18/10/2011 04:50:03 PM
- 719 Views
yes but I was talkin about his actuall posistions not the made up stuff *NM*
18/10/2011 05:10:47 PM
- 301 Views
When the candidate "makes them up" they are positions.
18/10/2011 05:26:18 PM
- 530 Views
all you need to do is provide a link supporting your claim that Perry said he wants to abolish SS
18/10/2011 05:56:23 PM
- 458 Views
Really? Do you not watch the news? That's common knowledge *NM*
18/10/2011 06:04:06 PM
- 213 Views
I believe what RT means ...
18/10/2011 06:22:42 PM
- 504 Views
No it isn't a fine point
18/10/2011 06:48:00 PM
- 661 Views
He said he wants private retirement accounts instead, which is abolishing Social Security.
18/10/2011 10:44:33 PM
- 644 Views
Privatizing isn't the same as abolishing
18/10/2011 10:53:04 PM
- 575 Views
It is unless the governments role is more than "you MUST do this; figure out how on your own."
19/10/2011 12:10:25 AM
- 639 Views
Are you correcting yourself or qualifying your statement?
19/10/2011 06:30:34 AM
- 624 Views
Neither; laws requiring everyone do something do NOTHING themselves.
20/10/2011 10:10:31 AM
- 605 Views
The ALL CAPS stuff isn't helping to convince me that this isn't all kool-aid drenched hyperbole
20/10/2011 01:15:19 PM
- 557 Views
Some things are better off in private hands, but "natural dependcies" are not among those things.
20/10/2011 03:42:15 PM
- 686 Views
It is ridiculously simple; here ya go:
18/10/2011 08:15:24 PM
- 567 Views
OK he doesn't like it now give me the link where he wants to abolish it
18/10/2011 09:29:38 PM
- 506 Views
You see no conflict between this post and your next one?
18/10/2011 10:16:21 PM
- 657 Views
no I don't
18/10/2011 11:36:38 PM
- 587 Views
By his own statements he either wants to end it or violate the Constitution.
19/10/2011 12:13:33 AM
- 556 Views
you really excell at misunderstanding *NM*
19/10/2011 12:30:32 AM
- 240 Views
I understand you but disagree, because I also understand plain English.
19/10/2011 02:06:23 AM
- 655 Views
More qualified to be President than Obama was at this stage.
18/10/2011 07:40:33 PM
- 532 Views
I assume you're refering to his implemented policies of corporate welfare? *NM*
18/10/2011 07:46:07 PM
- 234 Views
He did say, "at this stage;" Obama has been a quick study at corporate welfare.
19/10/2011 01:19:39 AM
- 535 Views
So this is an "Anybody but Obama" election for you, then? *NM*
19/10/2011 12:16:46 AM
- 208 Views
I thought that was a given, the reason Republicans will swallow their bile/tongues and vote Romney.
19/10/2011 01:17:46 AM
- 569 Views
Not just anyone. That way lies more idiocy than ignoring lies and pandering.
19/10/2011 07:23:18 AM
- 671 Views
His speeches do have a clear socialist agenda; too bad none of his policies have a hint of one.
20/10/2011 10:25:01 AM
- 704 Views
Post-debate, my opinion is fairly unchanged
19/10/2011 06:35:32 AM
- 713 Views
Romney slapped Perry down so hard tonight. It was wonderful.
19/10/2011 06:53:52 AM
- 610 Views
It was that, I rather enjoyed it
19/10/2011 07:10:49 AM
- 554 Views
I promise
19/10/2011 10:33:49 AM
- 645 Views
I can see the buttons now: "Vote for... something... maybe...!"
20/10/2011 10:46:44 AM
- 986 Views
...the words made sense by themselves, but when I put them together, meaning vanished.
20/10/2011 11:33:46 AM
- 528 Views
let me ask you this about Cain
19/10/2011 01:47:36 PM
- 631 Views
Why is that, would you think?
19/10/2011 06:29:53 PM
- 581 Views
There just seems to be strong lack of good choices
19/10/2011 06:50:25 PM
- 615 Views
I'm getting the same impression... not necessarily worse candidates, just more criticism.
19/10/2011 08:37:21 PM
- 755 Views
I blame the press
19/10/2011 09:05:36 PM
- 719 Views
It's rare that I agree with you so fully. Politics is the demesne of soundbites. *NM*
20/10/2011 12:38:48 AM
- 199 Views
I blame the public, and, to a lesser degree, Nielsen and Armitron.
20/10/2011 11:39:43 AM
- 633 Views
Re: let me ask you this about Cain
20/10/2011 07:05:43 AM
- 567 Views