Active Users:1202 Time:22/11/2024 04:44:32 PM
You really should read more about the Soviet Union. Tom Send a noteboard - 11/10/2011 03:19:32 PM
1. Proletarian dictatorship was achieved. Stalin just didn't trust the result, but after his death it was a proletarian dictatorship. If you had the right class background you could join the Party, and the Party was more participatory than a lot of people in the West would like to believe. If you look at Russian non-criminals, the numbers get up into the high 30%s. It's not democracy, but they were never aiming for that. "Democratic centralism" was the watchword.

2. Collectivization was achieved. Stalin didn't own tractors and really didn't give a shit about owning them. Peasants had an allotment to give to the state and the remainder was for them. Stalin wasn't about owning anything - he owned virtually nothing. He just controlled the State that owned everything. But he sure didn't walk around with jewels and nice clothes and fancy cars and live in mansions - he had a modest dacha and dressed in a military outfit all the time.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Is communism the true economy of democracies? - 10/10/2011 01:35:24 AM 773 Views
Sorry, not following this..... - 10/10/2011 03:33:11 AM 596 Views
Re: Sorry, not following this..... - 10/10/2011 03:54:45 AM 508 Views
Um, a LOT of places have mixed "free" market and state rule. - 10/10/2011 05:43:49 AM 617 Views
WTF? Canada, Western Europe, and Japan are democracies, not state-rule like China - *NM* - 10/10/2011 05:53:17 PM 227 Views
Think he means we all have public sector enterprise. - 10/10/2011 06:24:10 PM 444 Views
Yeah, I thought it was clear as well. - 10/10/2011 06:32:02 PM 481 Views
Yeah, Stephen pretty much covered it. - 11/10/2011 06:10:38 AM 521 Views
They are not similar. - 10/10/2011 04:01:59 AM 466 Views
Re: They are not similar. - 10/10/2011 04:47:26 AM 544 Views
No, but socialism is. - 10/10/2011 06:09:55 AM 519 Views
No. A thousand times no. - 10/10/2011 07:46:22 AM 602 Views
Guess I count myself among those fools, though I pretty much agree with Danny. - 10/10/2011 10:52:11 AM 509 Views
I don't usually answer your scattershot rants, Joel, but you have overextended yourself. - 10/10/2011 05:28:07 PM 546 Views
That still looks like Stalin and Mao rationalizing away the impossibility of their stated goals. - 11/10/2011 05:59:06 AM 560 Views
No time to today, but you're very wrong. - 11/10/2011 02:32:38 PM 443 Views
OK. - 11/10/2011 03:08:17 PM 431 Views
You really should read more about the Soviet Union. - 11/10/2011 03:19:32 PM 511 Views
Not sure it would change my perceptions. - 11/10/2011 03:41:08 PM 417 Views
In a single word: No. - 11/10/2011 08:26:36 AM 437 Views

Reply to Message