Active Users:539 Time:08/04/2025 07:00:15 AM
OK, I see what you mean now, thanks. Joel Send a noteboard - 11/10/2011 04:29:35 AM
Socialism is state control of most if not all sources of production. It is the form of economic system that the Soviet Union had.

The distinction between state industry and state controlled industry is a valid and important one.

Communism is defined (by the communists, no less) as the stage of development where the state withers away, money is no longer needed and all assets are held in common by the people. There is no example of a communist economic system ever having been implemented on a large scale. The closest thing that I can find is Nestor Makhno's anarchist collectives in the Ukraine during the Russian Civil War.

Meh, the notion of a stateless dictatorship of the proletariat has always been semantic self indulgent rhetoric. Communisms subordination of individual persons to "the people" is a state straight out of social contract government whether or not anyone can admit it. "Anarchist collective" is almost a contradiction in terms, and the proletariat can have no power, dictatorial or otherwise, without organizations and hierarchies that are governments substance. Calling it "the party" rather than "the state" is, again, only semantics.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 11/10/2011 at 04:40:48 AM
Reply to message
Is communism the true economy of democracies? - 10/10/2011 01:35:24 AM 845 Views
Sorry, not following this..... - 10/10/2011 03:33:11 AM 661 Views
Re: Sorry, not following this..... - 10/10/2011 03:54:45 AM 580 Views
Um, a LOT of places have mixed "free" market and state rule. - 10/10/2011 05:43:49 AM 684 Views
WTF? Canada, Western Europe, and Japan are democracies, not state-rule like China - *NM* - 10/10/2011 05:53:17 PM 256 Views
Think he means we all have public sector enterprise. - 10/10/2011 06:24:10 PM 505 Views
Yeah, I thought it was clear as well. - 10/10/2011 06:32:02 PM 551 Views
Yeah, Stephen pretty much covered it. - 11/10/2011 06:10:38 AM 596 Views
They are not similar. - 10/10/2011 04:01:59 AM 539 Views
Re: They are not similar. - 10/10/2011 04:47:26 AM 615 Views
Let's see...you're asking if property theft by the state is compatible with freedom? No. - 10/10/2011 04:58:14 AM 517 Views
I'm curious how you distinguish "full socialism" from "full communism." - 10/10/2011 05:32:53 AM 498 Views
You obviously don't understand the definitions of socialism and communism. - 10/10/2011 02:41:39 PM 583 Views
OK, I see what you mean now, thanks. - 11/10/2011 04:29:35 AM 515 Views
No, but socialism is. - 10/10/2011 06:09:55 AM 589 Views
No. A thousand times no. - 10/10/2011 07:46:22 AM 657 Views
Guess I count myself among those fools, though I pretty much agree with Danny. - 10/10/2011 10:52:11 AM 579 Views
I don't usually answer your scattershot rants, Joel, but you have overextended yourself. - 10/10/2011 05:28:07 PM 601 Views
That still looks like Stalin and Mao rationalizing away the impossibility of their stated goals. - 11/10/2011 05:59:06 AM 651 Views
No time to today, but you're very wrong. - 11/10/2011 02:32:38 PM 509 Views
OK. - 11/10/2011 03:08:17 PM 491 Views
You really should read more about the Soviet Union. - 11/10/2011 03:19:32 PM 580 Views
Not sure it would change my perceptions. - 11/10/2011 03:41:08 PM 493 Views
In a single word: No. - 11/10/2011 08:26:36 AM 510 Views

Reply to Message