Active Users:2221 Time:24/09/2026 05:08:34 PM
Perhaps not, but it should, and I am not above being a lone voice crying in the wilderness. Joel Send a noteboard - 08/10/2011 05:17:35 PM
What, exactly, makes them "different sets" of words? Different genitive declensions? :P

It doesn't matter what makes them different; it doesn't even matter if the only thing that makes them different is the way they are made possessive. The rules are clear even if why they are rules (or should be) isn't. What is equally clear is that you are not following the rule(s), which means you are not only not right, but wrong.

If the rules lack a basis or even logic, they are once again confusing and thus counterproductive, because they are not "clear" at all, but hopelessly muddled and arbitrary. Forced to choose, I would rather be logically right than grammatically right, because the latters only merit is to aid communication and comprehension, both impossible in the absence of the former.

If I convince a majority of the public and scholars to spell "fly" with "ie" when referring to the insect, is it a legitimate rule? ;)

Well, yes :P That's kind of the whole point. So until you convince the majority of the public and scholars to adopt your treatment of possessives, you'll remain wrong. Furthermore, your readers will have to spend extra time (negligible though it may be for each individual instance) deciding from context whether you mean a word to be plural, possessive, or whether you've simply made an error. And you'll give the appearance of someone who doesn't know how to write properly, which you're obviously fine with. ;)

Bah, you lecture me on rules then end not just a sentence but the entire post with a preposition? Madness; madness, I say! :P

If it IS merely the matter of popularity I suggested, yes, it is largely irrelevant; I long ago resolved to do what I believe right rather than what is simply most popular. ;)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
If talking sense is wrong, I don' wanna be right.
Reply to message
Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 06:46:31 PM 1209 Views
I'm not always sure that I'm correct, but.... - 05/10/2011 07:04:13 PM 911 Views
I didn't see any errors - 05/10/2011 07:24:27 PM 898 Views
Re: I didn't see any errors - 06/10/2011 03:14:07 PM 767 Views
You mean ... - 06/10/2011 03:58:32 PM 866 Views
Must ... have ... grammar. - 05/10/2011 07:53:34 PM 1085 Views
For you and Tom as well, the same question about question eight. - 05/10/2011 08:33:39 PM 1384 Views
Tom can probably give you actual terms and correct rules, but here's my take on it. - 05/10/2011 08:43:47 PM 862 Views
That makes sense as far as it goes. - 05/10/2011 09:02:42 PM 933 Views
But do you actually regard them that way? - 05/10/2011 09:08:36 PM 879 Views
Yeah, pretty much. - 05/10/2011 09:25:18 PM 848 Views
Re: Yeah, pretty much. - 05/10/2011 09:29:33 PM 720 Views
OK then. - 05/10/2011 09:59:50 PM 882 Views
You bring up a point that I was researching the other day - 05/10/2011 08:53:40 PM 923 Views
You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. - 05/10/2011 09:00:25 PM 896 Views
You're right of course! - 05/10/2011 09:13:44 PM 958 Views
I frequently am. - 05/10/2011 09:16:38 PM 964 Views
So I've noticed. - 05/10/2011 09:19:38 PM 896 Views
I like telling people, too. - 05/10/2011 09:34:50 PM 892 Views
You can use charmap. - 05/10/2011 10:21:32 PM 914 Views
Re: You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. - 06/10/2011 01:15:02 PM 821 Views
Mmm, dashing. - 05/10/2011 09:02:53 PM 873 Views
Emdashing is an entirely different form of punctuation. - 05/10/2011 09:07:36 PM 974 Views
Achtung! Grammatik! :insert Nazi-saluting smiley as the Wehrmacht marches by: - 05/10/2011 08:10:45 PM 992 Views
I love this bit. - 05/10/2011 08:26:52 PM 970 Views
Bring back the BSG! - 05/10/2011 08:55:32 PM 921 Views
Re: your 2nd irritating error for question 2 - 06/10/2011 04:12:49 PM 842 Views
Good poll, especially for this site. - 05/10/2011 08:11:10 PM 996 Views
Re: serial comma. - 05/10/2011 08:31:58 PM 882 Views
Maybe I was being a little anal there. - 05/10/2011 08:35:33 PM 853 Views
Same here - 05/10/2011 08:43:34 PM 742 Views
I think it's conventional to use a comma before "etc". - 05/10/2011 08:55:11 PM 826 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 08:33:06 PM 886 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 08:49:43 PM 945 Views
People should talk in a way that can be understood, else they are not communicating. - 05/10/2011 09:17:37 PM 937 Views
Re: "everyone's". ~winky~ *NM* - 05/10/2011 09:22:18 PM 430 Views
Is it time for my lecture on superfluous apostrophes again? - 05/10/2011 09:43:47 PM 843 Views
You mean your lecture on "superfluous" apostrophes. - 05/10/2011 09:53:31 PM 792 Views
As have I. Multiple times. *NM* - 05/10/2011 09:55:08 PM 413 Views
I am not stubborn, just true to my convictions. - 05/10/2011 09:56:39 PM 1043 Views
Unsurprisingly, I don't really agree with you at all on this point. :p - 05/10/2011 10:29:59 PM 932 Views
I do not really think I am "right" on this one so much as "not wrong." - 06/10/2011 12:01:36 AM 864 Views
But contradictions are inherent in the entire English language! - 06/10/2011 01:25:39 AM 843 Views
Sure, but not deliberate ones created by grammarians who know better. - 06/10/2011 05:40:58 AM 839 Views
I'm going to listen to the others. - 06/10/2011 06:17:18 AM 864 Views
Like I say, I appreciate exceptions when justified (and again, only claiming to be "not wrong." ) - 06/10/2011 07:26:18 AM 750 Views
But you are wrong - 06/10/2011 02:17:40 PM 906 Views
that is OK he is very good at being wrong *NM* - 06/10/2011 03:43:23 PM 442 Views
I disagree. - 07/10/2011 12:15:14 AM 830 Views
How utterly unsurprising - 07/10/2011 02:21:38 PM 824 Views
"We want to be nothing if not persistent." - 07/10/2011 02:39:19 PM 856 Views
Doesn't matter. - 07/10/2011 03:12:14 PM 855 Views
Perhaps not, but it should, and I am not above being a lone voice crying in the wilderness. - 08/10/2011 05:17:35 PM 972 Views
What. - 06/10/2011 06:17:41 PM 937 Views
You called? - 05/10/2011 08:53:54 PM 927 Views
Grammar schmammar! - 05/10/2011 09:01:47 PM 961 Views
Wongy tip #77 - 05/10/2011 11:15:12 PM 821 Views
#1) I do not use NetSpeak while playing games, texting or using social media. - 05/10/2011 11:34:12 PM 817 Views
What about NateSpeak? *NM* - 06/10/2011 04:01:08 PM 401 Views
I did use that once to tell the story of you and CNRedDragon going to see Ice Princess. *NM* - 07/10/2011 01:46:50 AM 434 Views
A timeless classic. - 07/10/2011 01:53:36 AM 794 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 06/10/2011 01:17:28 AM 848 Views
Yes. - 06/10/2011 06:53:46 AM 781 Views
I forgot about "of" for "have." - 06/10/2011 07:31:11 AM 829 Views
I try - 06/10/2011 09:18:29 AM 894 Views
I freebase split infinitives on a regular basis. - 06/10/2011 01:53:36 PM 747 Views
The split infinitive is not grammatically incorrect. - 06/10/2011 02:04:34 PM 841 Views
I wish more people knew this. - 06/10/2011 07:38:46 PM 775 Views
Junky Grammar. - 06/10/2011 04:24:01 PM 797 Views

Reply to Message