Active Users:1153 Time:22/11/2024 09:51:57 PM
I can see that with the Monothelites (can see their appeal, in fact,) but not Monophysites. Joel Send a noteboard - 07/10/2011 09:43:27 PM
Christians COMMONLY accepted most, if not all, of the Nicene Creed long before the Council of Nicaea. The Council was prompted by that commonly accepted beliefs growing erosion and muddling due to deliberate Gnostic and heretic assaults and a widespread vagueness and ignorance among NEW Christians only beginning to rigorously explore Christology. Thus the Church formally stated its Christology, clarifying what was indisputably Spirit breathed (e.g. the Gospel of John) and what was simply heresy (e.g. Monophysite denial of Christs humanity, Ebionite denial of His divinity, and Gnostic Trojan horses like the "Gospels" of Thomas and Judas.) The Councils of Nicaea and Ephesus brought order out of chaos by the Grace of God, but the idea Christianity had until then been an eclectic equivalent of Gnosticism that simply replaced "gnosis" with "Jesus" in not credible.

Monophysitism didn't even exist as a theology at the time of the Council of Nicaea, as far as I can tell from a quick look at the articles - it certainly didn't become a major controversy until the sixth century, two centuries after Nicaea. Nor is there any reason why monophysites should be considered to deviate from the Nicene Creed.

As it happens, that actually strengthens your case, though. The Copts, Ethiopian Christians and a few smaller groups have a theology that apparently is technically "miaphysite", but might as well be monophysite; this doesn't prevent them from adhering to the Nicene Creed.


Their issues arise from how the human/divine nature(s) of Christ are resolved and the hypostatic union certainly involved enough metaphysical hair splitting to cause those who held to "God from God, light from light, true God from true God" to question just how Christ is fully human and fully divine. It's why the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox consider the Oriental Orthodox to hold to a heretical idea rather than being a different religion, which is how they view Gnostics, Muslims, and yes, Mormons. In fact, Islam is considered by Catholics to have a more sound Christology than the Mormon faith because of the cosmology involved.

Can see that last part, too, but I will try to stay focused for once. Monophysitism seems to state pretty clearly that Christs human nature disappeared into His divine one, reducing the "was made man" part of the Nicene Creed to an entirely temporary condition: Christ WAS briefly human for the purpose of the Incarnation, but is not now human in any sense because His humanity was lost within his divinity.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Mormons - 03/10/2011 05:46:10 AM 2360 Views
Questions. - 03/10/2011 11:13:25 AM 1114 Views
Ooh! Ooh! - 03/10/2011 11:18:38 AM 965 Views
I don't watch it. - 04/10/2011 01:34:53 AM 970 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:28:28 PM 1075 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:31:13 PM 900 Views
Why did I look up what Quorn is? I didn't need to know that. *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:04:20 PM 627 Views
Wyld Stallyns!! - 03/10/2011 03:26:54 PM 901 Views
STATION! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:00:35 PM 553 Views
Re: One of the best replies, ever, on the internet. *NM* - 06/10/2011 02:43:07 AM 601 Views
....did we just get door-to-door'd...ONLINE?!?! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:34:19 AM 572 Views
Nope. - 04/10/2011 01:32:43 AM 956 Views
there's no real point to it - 04/10/2011 02:37:24 AM 1956 Views
We could use an evil cackling smilie, we do have some other evil ones - 04/10/2011 02:49:12 AM 921 Views
wasn't going to argue... *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:57:00 AM 545 Views
Do you ever giggle at the name "Moroni?" - 03/10/2011 11:39:55 AM 1022 Views
There are Mormon literalists? Seriously? *NM* - 03/10/2011 03:02:18 PM 563 Views
I know they don't have multiple wives anymore, so no misconception there - 03/10/2011 01:23:50 PM 948 Views
There are Fundamentalist "Mormons" who do... - 03/10/2011 11:32:56 PM 880 Views
Don't get me wrong by the way, I've met wonderful Mormons - 04/10/2011 12:22:03 PM 920 Views
Question: Why are you such a faggot? *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:23:45 PM 467 Views
Answer: because it's the only way he could return your burning love for him. - 03/10/2011 03:24:23 PM 694 Views
Oh dont be such a fuddy duddy. - 03/10/2011 10:42:06 PM 584 Views
Better a faggot than a fuckwad. Cheers fuckwad! *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:27:20 AM 588 Views
Well, I suppose you'ld be the one to know. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:54:35 AM 524 Views
Really? You really just pulled a "takes one to know one"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 04:19:22 PM 617 Views
Re: You embarrass yourself. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:56:02 AM 474 Views
I'll tell you whats embarresing... - 04/10/2011 02:08:02 AM 797 Views
That is hilarious. - 04/10/2011 03:10:50 AM 688 Views
Goodness.. - 04/10/2011 03:20:30 AM 632 Views
Re: - 04/10/2011 03:28:25 AM 663 Views
You know, my mother had a saying. - 04/10/2011 03:39:32 AM 696 Views
I think it's safe to say ... - 04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM 598 Views
I'm not sure which would be sadder... - 04/10/2011 11:32:55 AM 735 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 12:19:01 PM 561 Views
Re: You flatter me. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:31:01 PM 582 Views
OK, you need to delete the "Re:" You're using it incorrectly - 04/10/2011 01:55:53 PM 609 Views
"Re" doesn't have to mean "reply", it can also mean "regarding". - 04/10/2011 02:01:31 PM 640 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:06:58 PM 638 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:12:57 PM 604 Views
Re: Also. - 04/10/2011 02:08:15 PM 649 Views
you are still using it incorrectly. *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:09:48 PM 596 Views
He's doing it on purpose though. - 04/10/2011 03:31:39 PM 706 Views
Re: Yeah, it's just a shtick... - 04/10/2011 03:47:17 PM 605 Views
Those were the good old days. - 04/10/2011 04:02:33 PM 633 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 10:02:30 PM 533 Views
I agree, it's driving me nuts *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:36:45 PM 523 Views
That's not quite right, actually. - 04/10/2011 03:25:54 PM 548 Views
Disagree. *NM* - 04/10/2011 10:04:09 PM 560 Views
Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. - 04/10/2011 02:32:56 AM 598 Views
Heh. Oh, Ryan. - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM 714 Views
*sigh* to all of you above.... - 04/10/2011 03:06:21 AM 634 Views
I thought that was "Do not talk about /b/"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:12:52 AM 620 Views
i don't know, but if THAT is the first rule... - 04/10/2011 03:41:20 AM 576 Views
Please explain why you think we should consider you Christians. - 03/10/2011 04:33:06 PM 1103 Views
you know, that does make me wonder though - 03/10/2011 04:58:21 PM 995 Views
We're not as immovable as we are sometimes portrayed. - 03/10/2011 05:27:17 PM 972 Views
"Even Christ didn't do that"? I can't agree. - 03/10/2011 09:00:34 PM 940 Views
I conceded your last point. - 03/10/2011 10:14:28 PM 858 Views
Point of Anal Retentive Dissent: - 04/10/2011 03:54:00 PM 879 Views
That concept is alien to the Christian theological understanding, however. - 03/10/2011 10:18:55 PM 960 Views
I understand what both you and Danny are saying - 04/10/2011 12:19:57 AM 914 Views
Oh, that's very simple - 04/10/2011 04:02:24 AM 922 Views
I honestly don't know what it would take. - 04/10/2011 07:41:55 AM 941 Views
thank you, both of you - 04/10/2011 01:46:05 PM 926 Views
I love the Nicene Creed. It is such an excellent encapsulation. - 03/10/2011 06:07:53 PM 1000 Views
Agreed. - 04/10/2011 04:44:49 PM 887 Views
The absolute best part about your post (plus the best thing about Mo's/LDS's) - 03/10/2011 09:02:17 PM 937 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 03/10/2011 10:10:39 PM 1046 Views
Though they can cause interesting changes in patterns. - 03/10/2011 10:16:55 PM 946 Views
We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all mankind, and the only way back to God. - 04/10/2011 01:29:30 AM 1027 Views
If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 03:57:08 AM 1187 Views
I never said well-written, I said complex. - 04/10/2011 07:04:24 AM 1061 Views
Ignore facts all you want to. - 05/10/2011 01:07:35 AM 962 Views
Re: If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 07:24:27 AM 1167 Views
Woah nelly. - 04/10/2011 10:04:33 AM 981 Views
I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 01:52:48 PM 897 Views
Re: I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 04:42:47 PM 989 Views
oh well that makes it all better... - 04/10/2011 04:54:14 PM 1011 Views
Exactly - 04/10/2011 06:00:54 PM 896 Views
Was the twin banging and the gay wedding the same event? - 04/10/2011 06:36:03 PM 979 Views
I guess this is a variation on Hams punishment; Ghav, at least should know better than to be shocked - 04/10/2011 04:13:59 PM 878 Views
it's not that we're surprised because it's "novel" - 04/10/2011 04:19:16 PM 924 Views
It is not NECESSARILY racist. - 04/10/2011 04:39:33 PM 938 Views
Sure, except ... - 04/10/2011 04:50:53 PM 964 Views
Yeah, circular logic is fun, isn't it? - 05/10/2011 01:09:25 AM 897 Views
It it is nigh impossible to be a "non-Nicene Christian." - 04/10/2011 03:12:06 PM 972 Views
I think we've had this discussion before. - 06/10/2011 05:54:39 PM 956 Views
Arianism is a bad comparison for arguing LDS=Christian. - 06/10/2011 11:45:36 PM 844 Views
Wikipedia confirms what I already thought: you're off base with the monophysitism. - 07/10/2011 12:06:40 AM 1210 Views
Monophysites, miaphysites, monothelites, etc. certainly accept the consubstantiality of God/Christ - 07/10/2011 11:58:05 AM 895 Views
I can see that with the Monothelites (can see their appeal, in fact,) but not Monophysites. - 07/10/2011 09:43:27 PM 869 Views
I was just saying there were competing views. - 07/10/2011 07:49:26 PM 1328 Views
That sounds really nice. - 04/10/2011 06:38:29 PM 915 Views
Why wait though? - 05/10/2011 12:12:21 AM 1098 Views
So that Vivien can avoid reading and thinking about the stuff that you just wrote. *NM* - 05/10/2011 12:28:23 AM 510 Views
Ack, not reading and thinking111 - 05/10/2011 12:36:11 AM 928 Views
Yeah, that's what I thought. - 06/10/2011 05:43:57 PM 841 Views
I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 06/10/2011 08:51:15 PM 1090 Views
Re: I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 07/10/2011 07:45:29 PM 936 Views
Oh no you idn't... *waves finger and weaves head* - 04/10/2011 03:53:07 AM 765 Views
....i don't know what you look like - 04/10/2011 03:54:56 AM 904 Views
Took the words right out of my mouth, repeatedly. - 04/10/2011 12:49:13 PM 1095 Views
Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 01:14:16 AM 892 Views
Hmm - 05/10/2011 02:03:13 AM 1050 Views
True - 05/10/2011 02:13:00 AM 851 Views
I think of Protestantism in terms similar to a Xerox copy. - 05/10/2011 04:57:42 AM 955 Views
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM 1080 Views
I like that analogy - an echo chamber! *NM* - 08/10/2011 10:44:04 PM 547 Views
Re: Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 02:56:50 AM 1079 Views
Uhh... - 05/10/2011 03:08:49 AM 897 Views
The people at the Nicene Council and the other councils were not prophets. - 05/10/2011 04:59:50 AM 1005 Views
And you know that because... why, again? - 05/10/2011 07:13:53 AM 925 Views
Tough Crowd. - 03/10/2011 04:44:31 PM 1043 Views
No questions. Have a nice day. - 03/10/2011 11:40:58 PM 901 Views
Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:58:16 AM 634 Views
Re: Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? - 04/10/2011 05:23:12 PM 1002 Views

Reply to Message