Active Users:354 Time:04/07/2025 04:51:19 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Wikipedia confirms what I already thought: you're off base with the monophysitism. Legolas Send a noteboard - 07/10/2011 12:06:40 AM
Christians COMMONLY accepted most, if not all, of the Nicene Creed long before the Council of Nicaea. The Council was prompted by that commonly accepted beliefs growing erosion and muddling due to deliberate Gnostic and heretic assaults and a widespread vagueness and ignorance among NEW Christians only beginning to rigorously explore Christology. Thus the Church formally stated its Christology, clarifying what was indisputably Spirit breathed (e.g. the Gospel of John) and what was simply heresy (e.g. Monophysite denial of Christs humanity, Ebionite denial of His divinity, and Gnostic Trojan horses like the "Gospels" of Thomas and Judas.) The Councils of Nicaea and Ephesus brought order out of chaos by the Grace of God, but the idea Christianity had until then been an eclectic equivalent of Gnosticism that simply replaced "gnosis" with "Jesus" in not credible.

Monophysitism didn't even exist as a theology at the time of the Council of Nicaea, as far as I can tell from a quick look at the articles - it certainly didn't become a major controversy until the sixth century, two centuries after Nicaea. Nor is there any reason why monophysites should be considered to deviate from the Nicene Creed.

As it happens, that actually strengthens your case, though. The Copts, Ethiopian Christians and a few smaller groups have a theology that apparently is technically "miaphysite", but might as well be monophysite; this doesn't prevent them from adhering to the Nicene Creed.
Reply to message
Mormons CaptainHammer - 03/10/2011 05:46:10 AM 2486 Views
Questions. Kuke - 03/10/2011 11:13:25 AM 1224 Views
Ooh! Ooh! Kuke - 03/10/2011 11:18:38 AM 1096 Views
I don't watch it. Gher - 04/10/2011 01:34:53 AM 1105 Views
Re: Questions. CaptainHammer - 03/10/2011 01:28:28 PM 1201 Views
Re: Questions. CaptainHammer - 03/10/2011 01:31:13 PM 1038 Views
I don't understand why they would be called drinks, if they were not meant to be drunk. aerocontrols - 03/10/2011 03:28:48 PM 1132 Views
Why did I look up what Quorn is? I didn't need to know that. *NM* beetnemesis - 03/10/2011 02:04:20 PM 667 Views
Wyld Stallyns!! aerocontrols - 03/10/2011 03:26:54 PM 1012 Views
STATION! *NM* Two Wongs - 03/10/2011 11:00:35 PM 600 Views
Re: One of the best replies, ever, on the internet. *NM* Gaps - 06/10/2011 02:43:07 AM 654 Views
....did we just get door-to-door'd...ONLINE?!?! *NM* LadyLorraine - 03/10/2011 11:34:19 AM 622 Views
Nope. Gher - 04/10/2011 01:32:43 AM 1074 Views
there's no real point to it LadyLorraine - 04/10/2011 02:37:24 AM 2100 Views
We could use an evil cackling smilie, we do have some other evil ones Isaac - 04/10/2011 02:49:12 AM 1035 Views
wasn't going to argue... *NM* LadyLorraine - 04/10/2011 02:57:00 AM 603 Views
Do you ever giggle at the name "Moroni?" Ghavrel - 03/10/2011 11:39:55 AM 1145 Views
There are Mormon literalists? Seriously? *NM* Legolas - 03/10/2011 03:02:18 PM 608 Views
In fairness, I wonder the same about Christian literalists. *NM* Ghavrel - 03/10/2011 07:57:19 PM 670 Views
Yeah, but if you're gonna believe absurdities... Legolas - 03/10/2011 09:02:32 PM 1137 Views
Are you trying to suggest that "Reformed" or some other brand of scientology is plausible? Joel - 04/10/2011 04:28:40 PM 1093 Views
Actually, no. It'd be like laughing at... Hosea. Or Nemeiah. It's just an old name. Gher - 04/10/2011 12:30:57 AM 1055 Views
I know they don't have multiple wives anymore, so no misconception there ironclad - 03/10/2011 01:23:50 PM 1059 Views
There are Fundamentalist "Mormons" who do... Danu - 03/10/2011 11:32:56 PM 982 Views
Don't get me wrong by the way, I've met wonderful Mormons ironclad - 04/10/2011 12:22:03 PM 1041 Views
Question: Why are you such a faggot? *NM* Urza - 03/10/2011 02:23:45 PM 517 Views
Answer: because it's the only way he could return your burning love for him. Nate - 03/10/2011 03:24:23 PM 739 Views
Oh dont be such a fuddy duddy. Urza - 03/10/2011 10:42:06 PM 708 Views
Better a faggot than a fuckwad. Cheers fuckwad! *NM* everynametaken - 04/10/2011 01:27:20 AM 637 Views
Well, I suppose you'ld be the one to know. *NM* Urza - 04/10/2011 01:54:35 AM 566 Views
Really? You really just pulled a "takes one to know one"? *NM* Kronin al'Sulc - 04/10/2011 04:19:22 PM 672 Views
Re: You embarrass yourself. *NM* Gaps - 04/10/2011 01:56:02 AM 525 Views
I'll tell you whats embarresing... Urza - 04/10/2011 02:08:02 AM 856 Views
That is hilarious. Nate - 04/10/2011 03:10:50 AM 743 Views
Goodness.. Urza - 04/10/2011 03:20:30 AM 673 Views
Re: Nate - 04/10/2011 03:28:25 AM 709 Views
You know, my mother had a saying. Urza - 04/10/2011 03:39:32 AM 748 Views
I think it's safe to say ... Nate - 04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM 645 Views
I'm not sure which would be sadder... Legolas - 04/10/2011 11:32:55 AM 784 Views
*NM* ironclad - 04/10/2011 12:19:01 PM 605 Views
Re: You flatter me. *NM* Gaps - 04/10/2011 01:31:01 PM 633 Views
OK, you need to delete the "Re:" You're using it incorrectly beetnemesis - 04/10/2011 01:55:53 PM 664 Views
"Re" doesn't have to mean "reply", it can also mean "regarding". Legolas - 04/10/2011 02:01:31 PM 687 Views
Re: Re: Gaps - 04/10/2011 02:06:58 PM 692 Views
Re: Re: Stephen - 04/10/2011 02:12:57 PM 657 Views
Re: Also. Gaps - 04/10/2011 02:08:15 PM 702 Views
you are still using it incorrectly. *NM* LadyLorraine - 04/10/2011 02:09:48 PM 649 Views
He's doing it on purpose though. Nate - 04/10/2011 03:31:39 PM 773 Views
Re: Yeah, it's just a shtick... Gaps - 04/10/2011 03:47:17 PM 662 Views
Those were the good old days. Nate - 04/10/2011 04:02:33 PM 677 Views
*NM* TaskmasterJack - 04/10/2011 10:02:30 PM 586 Views
I agree, it's driving me nuts *NM* ironclad - 04/10/2011 02:36:45 PM 573 Views
That's not quite right, actually. Nate - 04/10/2011 03:25:54 PM 599 Views
Disagree. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 04/10/2011 10:04:09 PM 605 Views
Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. Great Lord of Chaos - 04/10/2011 02:32:56 AM 638 Views
Re: Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. Urza - 04/10/2011 02:37:41 AM 665 Views
Heh. Oh, Ryan. Kronin al'Sulc - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM 785 Views
*sigh* to all of you above.... LadyLorraine - 04/10/2011 03:06:21 AM 680 Views
I thought that was "Do not talk about /b/"? *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 04/10/2011 03:12:52 AM 670 Views
i don't know, but if THAT is the first rule... LadyLorraine - 04/10/2011 03:41:20 AM 634 Views
Please explain why you think we should consider you Christians. Tom - 03/10/2011 04:33:06 PM 1222 Views
you know, that does make me wonder though LadyLorraine - 03/10/2011 04:58:21 PM 1110 Views
We're not as immovable as we are sometimes portrayed. Dannymac - 03/10/2011 05:27:17 PM 1096 Views
"Even Christ didn't do that"? I can't agree. Legolas - 03/10/2011 09:00:34 PM 1079 Views
I conceded your last point. Dannymac - 03/10/2011 10:14:28 PM 975 Views
Point of Anal Retentive Dissent: Joel - 04/10/2011 03:54:00 PM 999 Views
That concept is alien to the Christian theological understanding, however. Tom - 03/10/2011 10:18:55 PM 1087 Views
I understand what both you and Danny are saying LadyLorraine - 04/10/2011 12:19:57 AM 1033 Views
Oh, that's very simple Tom - 04/10/2011 04:02:24 AM 1057 Views
I honestly don't know what it would take. Dannymac - 04/10/2011 07:41:55 AM 1051 Views
thank you, both of you LadyLorraine - 04/10/2011 01:46:05 PM 1036 Views
I love the Nicene Creed. It is such an excellent encapsulation. Rebekah - 03/10/2011 06:07:53 PM 1132 Views
Agreed. Joel - 04/10/2011 04:44:49 PM 1000 Views
The absolute best part about your post (plus the best thing about Mo's/LDS's) Jeordam - 03/10/2011 09:02:17 PM 1077 Views
Glad you enjoyed it Tom - 03/10/2011 10:10:39 PM 1162 Views
Though they can cause interesting changes in patterns. Dannymac - 03/10/2011 10:16:55 PM 1120 Views
We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all mankind, and the only way back to God. Gher - 04/10/2011 01:29:30 AM 1147 Views
If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. Tom - 04/10/2011 03:57:08 AM 1322 Views
I never said well-written, I said complex. Gher - 04/10/2011 07:04:24 AM 1201 Views
Ignore facts all you want to. Tom - 05/10/2011 01:07:35 AM 1090 Views
Re: If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. CaptainHammer - 04/10/2011 07:24:27 AM 1290 Views
Woah nelly. Ghavrel - 04/10/2011 10:04:33 AM 1091 Views
I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? LadyLorraine - 04/10/2011 01:52:48 PM 1021 Views
Re: I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? CaptainHammer - 04/10/2011 04:42:47 PM 1129 Views
oh well that makes it all better... LadyLorraine - 04/10/2011 04:54:14 PM 1131 Views
Exactly ironclad - 04/10/2011 06:00:54 PM 1047 Views
Was the twin banging and the gay wedding the same event? Joel - 04/10/2011 06:36:03 PM 1117 Views
Yikes. Even for religion, that's more than a little crazy. Nate - 04/10/2011 03:47:56 PM 1114 Views
I don't think there's much of a difference in crazy as opposed to other more mainstream religions. Vivien - 04/10/2011 07:08:06 PM 1079 Views
A difference exists if only in continued unabashed affirmation of a rather distasteful doctrine. Joel - 04/10/2011 11:06:51 PM 1068 Views
Then why can't women be priests? Or enter the altar? The curse on Eve is very much in place. *NM* Aeryn - 05/10/2011 12:27:04 AM 578 Views
OK, within the Mormon context I can see that point. Joel - 05/10/2011 12:33:52 AM 1010 Views
They can in quite a few denominations. *NM* Ghavrel - 05/10/2011 06:12:35 AM 628 Views
Whoops! You meant in LDS specifically. My mistake. *NM* Ghavrel - 05/10/2011 06:14:05 AM 592 Views
Right now I am not making an absolute statement but a relative one. Vivien - 05/10/2011 08:37:50 PM 866 Views
Yes, that is kind of the problem. Joel - 06/10/2011 12:13:27 AM 1038 Views
Oh, you didn't know? Joe Smith said black people are cursed for following Satan. Tom - 05/10/2011 01:10:35 AM 1061 Views
I guess this is a variation on Hams punishment; Ghav, at least should know better than to be shocked Joel - 04/10/2011 04:13:59 PM 1005 Views
it's not that we're surprised because it's "novel" LadyLorraine - 04/10/2011 04:19:16 PM 1042 Views
It is not NECESSARILY racist. Joel - 04/10/2011 04:39:33 PM 1064 Views
Sure, except ... Nate - 04/10/2011 04:50:53 PM 1095 Views
Well, the funny thing is Christian doctrine presupposes everyone, along with their ancestors... Joel - 04/10/2011 06:31:13 PM 984 Views
Yeah, circular logic is fun, isn't it? Tom - 05/10/2011 01:09:25 AM 1013 Views
It it is nigh impossible to be a "non-Nicene Christian." Joel - 04/10/2011 03:12:06 PM 1100 Views
I think we've had this discussion before. Gher - 06/10/2011 05:54:39 PM 1096 Views
Arianism is a bad comparison for arguing LDS=Christian. Joel - 06/10/2011 11:45:36 PM 991 Views
Wikipedia confirms what I already thought: you're off base with the monophysitism. Legolas - 07/10/2011 12:06:40 AM 1335 Views
I had not realized it was that late, but used it only as an example of multitudinous controversies. Joel - 07/10/2011 01:03:56 AM 1427 Views
Monophysites, miaphysites, monothelites, etc. certainly accept the consubstantiality of God/Christ Larry - 07/10/2011 11:58:05 AM 1021 Views
Virtually everyone has a more sound Christology than Mormons. Tom - 07/10/2011 06:45:45 PM 1079 Views
Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter. Joel - 08/10/2011 05:30:38 PM 1091 Views
I can see that with the Monothelites (can see their appeal, in fact,) but not Monophysites. Joel - 07/10/2011 09:43:27 PM 986 Views
Tempting as it is to prove Joel wrong (since he so frequently is), I need to take issue with this. Tom - 07/10/2011 06:59:13 PM 1073 Views
I was just saying there were competing views. Gher - 07/10/2011 07:49:26 PM 1460 Views
Oh, there were definitely competing views, just not competing Christian views. Joel - 07/10/2011 09:26:22 PM 972 Views
That sounds really nice. Vivien - 04/10/2011 06:38:29 PM 1052 Views
Why wait though? Joel - 05/10/2011 12:12:21 AM 1221 Views
So that Vivien can avoid reading and thinking about the stuff that you just wrote. *NM* Aeryn - 05/10/2011 12:28:23 AM 558 Views
Ack, not reading and thinking111 Joel - 05/10/2011 12:36:11 AM 1039 Views
I really want an answer from a mormon. Vivien - 05/10/2011 08:48:49 PM 1069 Views
Good luck with that; just because I can see no explanation save that I offered does not preclude one Joel - 06/10/2011 07:03:50 AM 980 Views
Yeah, that's what I thought. Gher - 06/10/2011 05:43:57 PM 979 Views
I'm satisfied by that explanation. Vivien - 06/10/2011 08:51:15 PM 1218 Views
Re: I'm satisfied by that explanation. Gher - 07/10/2011 07:45:29 PM 1055 Views
Oh no you idn't... *waves finger and weaves head* everynametaken - 04/10/2011 03:53:07 AM 884 Views
....i don't know what you look like LadyLorraine - 04/10/2011 03:54:56 AM 1013 Views
Shoot, my Mick Jagger strut is way better than my angry hispanic girl head/finger bob and weave. *NM* everynametaken - 05/10/2011 04:58:53 AM 691 Views
Took the words right out of my mouth, repeatedly. Joel - 04/10/2011 12:49:13 PM 1217 Views
Off-Topic Larry - 05/10/2011 01:14:16 AM 995 Views
Hmm Tom - 05/10/2011 02:03:13 AM 1178 Views
True Larry - 05/10/2011 02:13:00 AM 968 Views
I think of Protestantism in terms similar to a Xerox copy. Tom - 05/10/2011 04:57:42 AM 1083 Views
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology Larry - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM 1189 Views
I like that analogy - an echo chamber! *NM* Tom - 08/10/2011 10:44:04 PM 599 Views
Re: Off-Topic CaptainHammer - 05/10/2011 02:56:50 AM 1223 Views
Uhh... Larry - 05/10/2011 03:08:49 AM 1005 Views
The people at the Nicene Council and the other councils were not prophets. CaptainHammer - 05/10/2011 04:59:50 AM 1123 Views
And you know that because... why, again? Joel - 05/10/2011 07:13:53 AM 1058 Views
Tough Crowd. Dannymac - 03/10/2011 04:44:31 PM 1168 Views
No questions. Have a nice day. TaskmasterJack - 03/10/2011 11:40:58 PM 1016 Views
Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? *NM* Dan - 04/10/2011 03:58:16 AM 681 Views
Re: Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? CaptainHammer - 04/10/2011 05:23:12 PM 1124 Views
Danny is right, it is a pretty tough crowd, but better tough than weak and whitewashed. everynametaken - 04/10/2011 04:02:16 AM 1056 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes