Active Users:612 Time:24/02/2025 08:58:50 AM
Wikipedia confirms what I already thought: you're off base with the monophysitism. Legolas Send a noteboard - 07/10/2011 12:06:40 AM
Christians COMMONLY accepted most, if not all, of the Nicene Creed long before the Council of Nicaea. The Council was prompted by that commonly accepted beliefs growing erosion and muddling due to deliberate Gnostic and heretic assaults and a widespread vagueness and ignorance among NEW Christians only beginning to rigorously explore Christology. Thus the Church formally stated its Christology, clarifying what was indisputably Spirit breathed (e.g. the Gospel of John) and what was simply heresy (e.g. Monophysite denial of Christs humanity, Ebionite denial of His divinity, and Gnostic Trojan horses like the "Gospels" of Thomas and Judas.) The Councils of Nicaea and Ephesus brought order out of chaos by the Grace of God, but the idea Christianity had until then been an eclectic equivalent of Gnosticism that simply replaced "gnosis" with "Jesus" in not credible.

Monophysitism didn't even exist as a theology at the time of the Council of Nicaea, as far as I can tell from a quick look at the articles - it certainly didn't become a major controversy until the sixth century, two centuries after Nicaea. Nor is there any reason why monophysites should be considered to deviate from the Nicene Creed.

As it happens, that actually strengthens your case, though. The Copts, Ethiopian Christians and a few smaller groups have a theology that apparently is technically "miaphysite", but might as well be monophysite; this doesn't prevent them from adhering to the Nicene Creed.
Reply to message
Mormons - 03/10/2011 05:46:10 AM 2431 Views
Questions. - 03/10/2011 11:13:25 AM 1176 Views
Ooh! Ooh! - 03/10/2011 11:18:38 AM 1033 Views
I don't watch it. - 04/10/2011 01:34:53 AM 1034 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:28:28 PM 1142 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:31:13 PM 963 Views
Why did I look up what Quorn is? I didn't need to know that. *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:04:20 PM 646 Views
Wyld Stallyns!! - 03/10/2011 03:26:54 PM 960 Views
STATION! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:00:35 PM 576 Views
Re: One of the best replies, ever, on the internet. *NM* - 06/10/2011 02:43:07 AM 630 Views
....did we just get door-to-door'd...ONLINE?!?! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:34:19 AM 603 Views
Nope. - 04/10/2011 01:32:43 AM 1023 Views
there's no real point to it - 04/10/2011 02:37:24 AM 2030 Views
We could use an evil cackling smilie, we do have some other evil ones - 04/10/2011 02:49:12 AM 986 Views
wasn't going to argue... *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:57:00 AM 572 Views
Do you ever giggle at the name "Moroni?" - 03/10/2011 11:39:55 AM 1080 Views
There are Mormon literalists? Seriously? *NM* - 03/10/2011 03:02:18 PM 589 Views
I know they don't have multiple wives anymore, so no misconception there - 03/10/2011 01:23:50 PM 1006 Views
There are Fundamentalist "Mormons" who do... - 03/10/2011 11:32:56 PM 915 Views
Don't get me wrong by the way, I've met wonderful Mormons - 04/10/2011 12:22:03 PM 985 Views
Question: Why are you such a faggot? *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:23:45 PM 496 Views
Answer: because it's the only way he could return your burning love for him. - 03/10/2011 03:24:23 PM 718 Views
Oh dont be such a fuddy duddy. - 03/10/2011 10:42:06 PM 611 Views
Better a faggot than a fuckwad. Cheers fuckwad! *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:27:20 AM 616 Views
Well, I suppose you'ld be the one to know. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:54:35 AM 547 Views
Really? You really just pulled a "takes one to know one"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 04:19:22 PM 648 Views
Re: You embarrass yourself. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:56:02 AM 503 Views
I'll tell you whats embarresing... - 04/10/2011 02:08:02 AM 830 Views
That is hilarious. - 04/10/2011 03:10:50 AM 719 Views
Goodness.. - 04/10/2011 03:20:30 AM 651 Views
Re: - 04/10/2011 03:28:25 AM 689 Views
You know, my mother had a saying. - 04/10/2011 03:39:32 AM 728 Views
I think it's safe to say ... - 04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM 624 Views
I'm not sure which would be sadder... - 04/10/2011 11:32:55 AM 763 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 12:19:01 PM 586 Views
Re: You flatter me. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:31:01 PM 609 Views
OK, you need to delete the "Re:" You're using it incorrectly - 04/10/2011 01:55:53 PM 640 Views
"Re" doesn't have to mean "reply", it can also mean "regarding". - 04/10/2011 02:01:31 PM 668 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:06:58 PM 667 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:12:57 PM 634 Views
Re: Also. - 04/10/2011 02:08:15 PM 679 Views
you are still using it incorrectly. *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:09:48 PM 620 Views
He's doing it on purpose though. - 04/10/2011 03:31:39 PM 743 Views
Re: Yeah, it's just a shtick... - 04/10/2011 03:47:17 PM 637 Views
Those were the good old days. - 04/10/2011 04:02:33 PM 657 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 10:02:30 PM 563 Views
I agree, it's driving me nuts *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:36:45 PM 551 Views
That's not quite right, actually. - 04/10/2011 03:25:54 PM 576 Views
Disagree. *NM* - 04/10/2011 10:04:09 PM 583 Views
Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. - 04/10/2011 02:32:56 AM 620 Views
Heh. Oh, Ryan. - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM 744 Views
*sigh* to all of you above.... - 04/10/2011 03:06:21 AM 659 Views
I thought that was "Do not talk about /b/"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:12:52 AM 644 Views
i don't know, but if THAT is the first rule... - 04/10/2011 03:41:20 AM 614 Views
Please explain why you think we should consider you Christians. - 03/10/2011 04:33:06 PM 1167 Views
you know, that does make me wonder though - 03/10/2011 04:58:21 PM 1058 Views
We're not as immovable as we are sometimes portrayed. - 03/10/2011 05:27:17 PM 1038 Views
"Even Christ didn't do that"? I can't agree. - 03/10/2011 09:00:34 PM 1015 Views
I conceded your last point. - 03/10/2011 10:14:28 PM 919 Views
Point of Anal Retentive Dissent: - 04/10/2011 03:54:00 PM 944 Views
That concept is alien to the Christian theological understanding, however. - 03/10/2011 10:18:55 PM 1022 Views
I understand what both you and Danny are saying - 04/10/2011 12:19:57 AM 977 Views
Oh, that's very simple - 04/10/2011 04:02:24 AM 994 Views
I honestly don't know what it would take. - 04/10/2011 07:41:55 AM 998 Views
thank you, both of you - 04/10/2011 01:46:05 PM 989 Views
I love the Nicene Creed. It is such an excellent encapsulation. - 03/10/2011 06:07:53 PM 1064 Views
Agreed. - 04/10/2011 04:44:49 PM 952 Views
The absolute best part about your post (plus the best thing about Mo's/LDS's) - 03/10/2011 09:02:17 PM 1022 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 03/10/2011 10:10:39 PM 1109 Views
Though they can cause interesting changes in patterns. - 03/10/2011 10:16:55 PM 1032 Views
We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all mankind, and the only way back to God. - 04/10/2011 01:29:30 AM 1093 Views
If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 03:57:08 AM 1259 Views
I never said well-written, I said complex. - 04/10/2011 07:04:24 AM 1136 Views
Ignore facts all you want to. - 05/10/2011 01:07:35 AM 1037 Views
Re: If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 07:24:27 AM 1237 Views
Woah nelly. - 04/10/2011 10:04:33 AM 1041 Views
I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 01:52:48 PM 963 Views
Re: I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 04:42:47 PM 1072 Views
oh well that makes it all better... - 04/10/2011 04:54:14 PM 1081 Views
Exactly - 04/10/2011 06:00:54 PM 977 Views
Was the twin banging and the gay wedding the same event? - 04/10/2011 06:36:03 PM 1050 Views
I guess this is a variation on Hams punishment; Ghav, at least should know better than to be shocked - 04/10/2011 04:13:59 PM 950 Views
it's not that we're surprised because it's "novel" - 04/10/2011 04:19:16 PM 992 Views
It is not NECESSARILY racist. - 04/10/2011 04:39:33 PM 998 Views
Sure, except ... - 04/10/2011 04:50:53 PM 1036 Views
Yeah, circular logic is fun, isn't it? - 05/10/2011 01:09:25 AM 956 Views
It it is nigh impossible to be a "non-Nicene Christian." - 04/10/2011 03:12:06 PM 1045 Views
I think we've had this discussion before. - 06/10/2011 05:54:39 PM 1028 Views
Arianism is a bad comparison for arguing LDS=Christian. - 06/10/2011 11:45:36 PM 916 Views
Wikipedia confirms what I already thought: you're off base with the monophysitism. - 07/10/2011 12:06:40 AM 1275 Views
I was just saying there were competing views. - 07/10/2011 07:49:26 PM 1400 Views
That sounds really nice. - 04/10/2011 06:38:29 PM 990 Views
Why wait though? - 05/10/2011 12:12:21 AM 1171 Views
So that Vivien can avoid reading and thinking about the stuff that you just wrote. *NM* - 05/10/2011 12:28:23 AM 537 Views
Ack, not reading and thinking111 - 05/10/2011 12:36:11 AM 988 Views
Yeah, that's what I thought. - 06/10/2011 05:43:57 PM 914 Views
I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 06/10/2011 08:51:15 PM 1161 Views
Re: I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 07/10/2011 07:45:29 PM 1000 Views
Oh no you idn't... *waves finger and weaves head* - 04/10/2011 03:53:07 AM 828 Views
....i don't know what you look like - 04/10/2011 03:54:56 AM 960 Views
Took the words right out of my mouth, repeatedly. - 04/10/2011 12:49:13 PM 1162 Views
Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 01:14:16 AM 926 Views
Hmm - 05/10/2011 02:03:13 AM 1124 Views
True - 05/10/2011 02:13:00 AM 914 Views
I think of Protestantism in terms similar to a Xerox copy. - 05/10/2011 04:57:42 AM 1019 Views
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM 1144 Views
I like that analogy - an echo chamber! *NM* - 08/10/2011 10:44:04 PM 579 Views
Re: Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 02:56:50 AM 1153 Views
Uhh... - 05/10/2011 03:08:49 AM 957 Views
The people at the Nicene Council and the other councils were not prophets. - 05/10/2011 04:59:50 AM 1069 Views
And you know that because... why, again? - 05/10/2011 07:13:53 AM 996 Views
Tough Crowd. - 03/10/2011 04:44:31 PM 1112 Views
No questions. Have a nice day. - 03/10/2011 11:40:58 PM 962 Views
Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:58:16 AM 660 Views
Re: Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? - 04/10/2011 05:23:12 PM 1069 Views

Reply to Message