Active Users:1019 Time:23/12/2024 05:51:41 PM
Are you trying to suggest that "Reformed" or some other brand of scientology is plausible? Joel Send a noteboard - 04/10/2011 04:28:40 PM
it always helps if they've a respectable age and have been believed in a good long while, so people have gotten used to them a bit. That said, even though the LDS church is, what, over a century and a half old, I have a hard time taking Mormon literalism more seriously than, well, Scientology literalism.

Scientology is like the Church of the Sub-Genius: Someone decided to start a joke religion with the explicit purpose of making money; the difference is that scientology somehow managed to be taken seriously. Guess Hubbard won his bet with Asimov/Le Guin/Campbell/any of the other individuals MANY people have stated Hubbard bet he could start a fake religion and get people to believe in it. Depending on ones perspective, that is evidence that either spirituality or credulity (possibly both) are integral to humanity.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Mormons - 03/10/2011 05:46:10 AM 2374 Views
Questions. - 03/10/2011 11:13:25 AM 1125 Views
Ooh! Ooh! - 03/10/2011 11:18:38 AM 981 Views
I don't watch it. - 04/10/2011 01:34:53 AM 985 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:28:28 PM 1087 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:31:13 PM 911 Views
Why did I look up what Quorn is? I didn't need to know that. *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:04:20 PM 632 Views
Wyld Stallyns!! - 03/10/2011 03:26:54 PM 911 Views
STATION! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:00:35 PM 557 Views
Re: One of the best replies, ever, on the internet. *NM* - 06/10/2011 02:43:07 AM 608 Views
....did we just get door-to-door'd...ONLINE?!?! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:34:19 AM 578 Views
Nope. - 04/10/2011 01:32:43 AM 968 Views
there's no real point to it - 04/10/2011 02:37:24 AM 1966 Views
We could use an evil cackling smilie, we do have some other evil ones - 04/10/2011 02:49:12 AM 936 Views
wasn't going to argue... *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:57:00 AM 551 Views
Do you ever giggle at the name "Moroni?" - 03/10/2011 11:39:55 AM 1034 Views
There are Mormon literalists? Seriously? *NM* - 03/10/2011 03:02:18 PM 567 Views
In fairness, I wonder the same about Christian literalists. *NM* - 03/10/2011 07:57:19 PM 581 Views
Yeah, but if you're gonna believe absurdities... - 03/10/2011 09:02:32 PM 1021 Views
Are you trying to suggest that "Reformed" or some other brand of scientology is plausible? - 04/10/2011 04:28:40 PM 976 Views
I know they don't have multiple wives anymore, so no misconception there - 03/10/2011 01:23:50 PM 955 Views
There are Fundamentalist "Mormons" who do... - 03/10/2011 11:32:56 PM 894 Views
Don't get me wrong by the way, I've met wonderful Mormons - 04/10/2011 12:22:03 PM 933 Views
Question: Why are you such a faggot? *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:23:45 PM 474 Views
Answer: because it's the only way he could return your burning love for him. - 03/10/2011 03:24:23 PM 698 Views
Oh dont be such a fuddy duddy. - 03/10/2011 10:42:06 PM 589 Views
Better a faggot than a fuckwad. Cheers fuckwad! *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:27:20 AM 595 Views
Well, I suppose you'ld be the one to know. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:54:35 AM 527 Views
Really? You really just pulled a "takes one to know one"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 04:19:22 PM 624 Views
Re: You embarrass yourself. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:56:02 AM 478 Views
I'll tell you whats embarresing... - 04/10/2011 02:08:02 AM 802 Views
That is hilarious. - 04/10/2011 03:10:50 AM 693 Views
Goodness.. - 04/10/2011 03:20:30 AM 637 Views
Re: - 04/10/2011 03:28:25 AM 668 Views
You know, my mother had a saying. - 04/10/2011 03:39:32 AM 703 Views
I think it's safe to say ... - 04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM 602 Views
I'm not sure which would be sadder... - 04/10/2011 11:32:55 AM 738 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 12:19:01 PM 565 Views
Re: You flatter me. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:31:01 PM 587 Views
OK, you need to delete the "Re:" You're using it incorrectly - 04/10/2011 01:55:53 PM 614 Views
"Re" doesn't have to mean "reply", it can also mean "regarding". - 04/10/2011 02:01:31 PM 644 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:06:58 PM 640 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:12:57 PM 611 Views
Re: Also. - 04/10/2011 02:08:15 PM 655 Views
you are still using it incorrectly. *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:09:48 PM 599 Views
He's doing it on purpose though. - 04/10/2011 03:31:39 PM 713 Views
Re: Yeah, it's just a shtick... - 04/10/2011 03:47:17 PM 609 Views
Those were the good old days. - 04/10/2011 04:02:33 PM 637 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 10:02:30 PM 541 Views
I agree, it's driving me nuts *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:36:45 PM 530 Views
That's not quite right, actually. - 04/10/2011 03:25:54 PM 555 Views
Disagree. *NM* - 04/10/2011 10:04:09 PM 565 Views
Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. - 04/10/2011 02:32:56 AM 603 Views
Heh. Oh, Ryan. - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM 721 Views
*sigh* to all of you above.... - 04/10/2011 03:06:21 AM 638 Views
I thought that was "Do not talk about /b/"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:12:52 AM 625 Views
i don't know, but if THAT is the first rule... - 04/10/2011 03:41:20 AM 583 Views
Please explain why you think we should consider you Christians. - 03/10/2011 04:33:06 PM 1116 Views
you know, that does make me wonder though - 03/10/2011 04:58:21 PM 1008 Views
We're not as immovable as we are sometimes portrayed. - 03/10/2011 05:27:17 PM 986 Views
"Even Christ didn't do that"? I can't agree. - 03/10/2011 09:00:34 PM 956 Views
I conceded your last point. - 03/10/2011 10:14:28 PM 870 Views
Point of Anal Retentive Dissent: - 04/10/2011 03:54:00 PM 894 Views
That concept is alien to the Christian theological understanding, however. - 03/10/2011 10:18:55 PM 973 Views
I understand what both you and Danny are saying - 04/10/2011 12:19:57 AM 927 Views
Oh, that's very simple - 04/10/2011 04:02:24 AM 938 Views
I honestly don't know what it would take. - 04/10/2011 07:41:55 AM 954 Views
thank you, both of you - 04/10/2011 01:46:05 PM 939 Views
I love the Nicene Creed. It is such an excellent encapsulation. - 03/10/2011 06:07:53 PM 1014 Views
Agreed. - 04/10/2011 04:44:49 PM 901 Views
The absolute best part about your post (plus the best thing about Mo's/LDS's) - 03/10/2011 09:02:17 PM 951 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 03/10/2011 10:10:39 PM 1057 Views
Though they can cause interesting changes in patterns. - 03/10/2011 10:16:55 PM 959 Views
We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all mankind, and the only way back to God. - 04/10/2011 01:29:30 AM 1044 Views
If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 03:57:08 AM 1207 Views
I never said well-written, I said complex. - 04/10/2011 07:04:24 AM 1079 Views
Ignore facts all you want to. - 05/10/2011 01:07:35 AM 978 Views
Re: If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 07:24:27 AM 1184 Views
Woah nelly. - 04/10/2011 10:04:33 AM 995 Views
I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 01:52:48 PM 908 Views
Re: I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 04:42:47 PM 1005 Views
oh well that makes it all better... - 04/10/2011 04:54:14 PM 1029 Views
Exactly - 04/10/2011 06:00:54 PM 912 Views
Was the twin banging and the gay wedding the same event? - 04/10/2011 06:36:03 PM 992 Views
I guess this is a variation on Hams punishment; Ghav, at least should know better than to be shocked - 04/10/2011 04:13:59 PM 894 Views
it's not that we're surprised because it's "novel" - 04/10/2011 04:19:16 PM 938 Views
It is not NECESSARILY racist. - 04/10/2011 04:39:33 PM 950 Views
Sure, except ... - 04/10/2011 04:50:53 PM 978 Views
Yeah, circular logic is fun, isn't it? - 05/10/2011 01:09:25 AM 910 Views
That sounds really nice. - 04/10/2011 06:38:29 PM 931 Views
Why wait though? - 05/10/2011 12:12:21 AM 1110 Views
So that Vivien can avoid reading and thinking about the stuff that you just wrote. *NM* - 05/10/2011 12:28:23 AM 513 Views
Ack, not reading and thinking111 - 05/10/2011 12:36:11 AM 940 Views
Yeah, that's what I thought. - 06/10/2011 05:43:57 PM 858 Views
I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 06/10/2011 08:51:15 PM 1107 Views
Re: I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 07/10/2011 07:45:29 PM 948 Views
Oh no you idn't... *waves finger and weaves head* - 04/10/2011 03:53:07 AM 778 Views
....i don't know what you look like - 04/10/2011 03:54:56 AM 914 Views
Took the words right out of my mouth, repeatedly. - 04/10/2011 12:49:13 PM 1111 Views
Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 01:14:16 AM 906 Views
Hmm - 05/10/2011 02:03:13 AM 1065 Views
True - 05/10/2011 02:13:00 AM 864 Views
I think of Protestantism in terms similar to a Xerox copy. - 05/10/2011 04:57:42 AM 969 Views
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM 1092 Views
I like that analogy - an echo chamber! *NM* - 08/10/2011 10:44:04 PM 553 Views
Re: Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 02:56:50 AM 1088 Views
Uhh... - 05/10/2011 03:08:49 AM 911 Views
The people at the Nicene Council and the other councils were not prophets. - 05/10/2011 04:59:50 AM 1020 Views
And you know that because... why, again? - 05/10/2011 07:13:53 AM 942 Views
Tough Crowd. - 03/10/2011 04:44:31 PM 1057 Views
No questions. Have a nice day. - 03/10/2011 11:40:58 PM 913 Views
Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:58:16 AM 639 Views
Re: Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? - 04/10/2011 05:23:12 PM 1018 Views

Reply to Message