Perhaps its a case of living and dying by the sword or perhaps I tend to bring out the hypocrite in people or I suppose its altogether possible I've simply lumped quite a few of you in a category with ideals that hold no sway for you; however, I've generally made a rule for myself to behave in a well mannered fashion with those who who are themselves capable of proper discourse and possessing of some not all together manufactured integrity.
... that you do indeed tend to bring the hypocrite out in people. Everyone has a little hypocrite inside them. Mine doesn't really like you, and I think that's his prerogative. I'm not particularly feeling up for ShitFest 2011, but if you want to go for it I suppose I'll sit and watch.
I can't speak for everyone, but my own personal rules for being nice to people actually and surprisingly sound close to yours even though I feel we employ these rules in very different ways. In short, be nice to people who are nice, but don't feel any need to extend the same courtesy to people who are not nice. Why do you expect people to be nice to you when you aren't nice to others? You seem to feel that they deserve it, and there certainly are people who insult you for your inflammatory opinions before you directly assault them, but I'm having a hard time seeing how it is so in this case. Whether you have something against Mormonism or not (I'm ambivalent and non-religious, ambiviligious you might say), you directly attempted to insult him though he himself had done nothing to you that I am aware of. That's what I was responding to.
Do you feel that it was unfair of me to say what I've said given that in my eyes you are the one who first insulted someone with neither provocation nor justification? If so I would be happy to continue discussing this grievance. If I remember correctly, so far I have said that I feel you should be banned, that I think you are unintentionally hilarious, and that I find your posts to often be mean-spirited, misogynistic, or vainglorious. Oh, and that you are an attention seeker. I'm not sure which of those is particularly out of line, given the circumstances. If you feel that a score somehow needs to be evened between us, I can help you with that. I am sometimes judgmental, I am unreasonably stubborn in my lifestyle choices, I am fairly anti-social and not very good at it when I try to be otherwise, I'm crap at speaking to girls (but a few of them have somehow liked me anyway), I am a good writer but not nearly as good as I used to like to think I was, I probably couldn't take a bear in a fair fight, I'm starting to get balding, I'm only in average physical shape, I had a failed long distance relationship that may have been ill-considered but will never be regretted, I'm an unrepentant Canadian with socialist leanings, I can stink up the bathroom something godawful fierce when I put my mind to it, I sometimes get upset at people in posts and express my feelings only to find myself unwilling to actually fight with a person because fighting actually kind of sucks and I can usually end up seeing their point of view even if they never so much as try to see mine, I write some boring ass shit sometimes, I've only been punched once in my life and it was by a girl, I occasionally fail at objectivity and don't think that's always a bad thing, I'm a picky eater, I have terrible eyesight, I feel unreasonable pride at the tiny amount of popularity I have (or used to have) here even though at the end of the day I don't put much stock in it, I think hockey is cool, I can't belch the alphabet, I don't drink or smoke or really have any sort of vice outside of video games and junk food and that probably makes me boring, I like big butts and I cannot lie, and this one time in Mexico I ... no, nevermind about that one.
Warder to starry_nite
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
This message has been locked.
This message last edited by Nate on 04/10/2011 at 04:11:26 AM
This message last edited by Nate on 04/10/2011 at 04:11:26 AM
- Edit 1 by Nate on 04/10/2011 at 04:11:26 AM
Mormons
03/10/2011 05:46:10 AM
- 2485 Views
Questions.
03/10/2011 11:13:25 AM
- 1223 Views
Re: Questions.
03/10/2011 01:28:28 PM
- 1200 Views
I don't understand why they would be called drinks, if they were not meant to be drunk.
03/10/2011 03:28:48 PM
- 1131 Views
Why did I look up what Quorn is? I didn't need to know that. *NM*
03/10/2011 02:04:20 PM
- 666 Views
....did we just get door-to-door'd...ONLINE?!?! *NM*
03/10/2011 11:34:19 AM
- 621 Views
Nope.
04/10/2011 01:32:43 AM
- 1073 Views
there's no real point to it
04/10/2011 02:37:24 AM
- 2099 Views

We could use an evil cackling smilie, we do have some other evil ones




04/10/2011 02:49:12 AM
- 1034 Views






Do you ever giggle at the name "Moroni?"
03/10/2011 11:39:55 AM
- 1144 Views
There are Mormon literalists? Seriously? *NM*
03/10/2011 03:02:18 PM
- 607 Views
In fairness, I wonder the same about Christian literalists.
*NM*
03/10/2011 07:57:19 PM
- 668 Views

Yeah, but if you're gonna believe absurdities...
03/10/2011 09:02:32 PM
- 1136 Views
Are you trying to suggest that "Reformed" or some other brand of scientology is plausible?
04/10/2011 04:28:40 PM
- 1092 Views

Actually, no. It'd be like laughing at... Hosea. Or Nemeiah. It's just an old name.
04/10/2011 12:30:57 AM
- 1054 Views
I know they don't have multiple wives anymore, so no misconception there
03/10/2011 01:23:50 PM
- 1058 Views
Question: Why are you such a faggot? *NM*
03/10/2011 02:23:45 PM
- 516 Views
Answer: because it's the only way he could return your burning love for him.
03/10/2011 03:24:23 PM
- 738 Views
Better a faggot than a fuckwad. Cheers fuckwad!
*NM*
04/10/2011 01:27:20 AM
- 636 Views

Re: You embarrass yourself. *NM*
04/10/2011 01:56:02 AM
- 524 Views
I'll tell you whats embarresing...
04/10/2011 02:08:02 AM
- 855 Views
That is hilarious.
04/10/2011 03:10:50 AM
- 742 Views
Goodness..
04/10/2011 03:20:30 AM
- 672 Views
Re:
04/10/2011 03:28:25 AM
- 708 Views
You know, my mother had a saying.
04/10/2011 03:39:32 AM
- 747 Views
I think it's safe to say ...
04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM
- 644 Views
OK, you need to delete the "Re:" You're using it incorrectly
04/10/2011 01:55:53 PM
- 663 Views
Re: Also.
04/10/2011 02:08:15 PM
- 701 Views
you are still using it incorrectly. *NM*
04/10/2011 02:09:48 PM
- 646 Views
He's doing it on purpose though.
04/10/2011 03:31:39 PM
- 772 Views
Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay.
04/10/2011 02:32:56 AM
- 637 Views
Re: Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay.
04/10/2011 02:37:41 AM
- 664 Views
*sigh* to all of you above....
04/10/2011 03:06:21 AM
- 679 Views
Please explain why you think we should consider you Christians.
03/10/2011 04:33:06 PM
- 1221 Views
you know, that does make me wonder though
03/10/2011 04:58:21 PM
- 1109 Views
We're not as immovable as we are sometimes portrayed.
03/10/2011 05:27:17 PM
- 1095 Views
That concept is alien to the Christian theological understanding, however.
03/10/2011 10:18:55 PM
- 1086 Views
I understand what both you and Danny are saying
04/10/2011 12:19:57 AM
- 1032 Views
The absolute best part about your post (plus the best thing about Mo's/LDS's)
03/10/2011 09:02:17 PM
- 1076 Views
We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all mankind, and the only way back to God.
04/10/2011 01:29:30 AM
- 1145 Views
If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss.
04/10/2011 03:57:08 AM
- 1319 Views
Re: If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss.
04/10/2011 07:24:27 AM
- 1288 Views
Woah nelly.
04/10/2011 10:04:33 AM
- 1090 Views
I have to "Wow" as well... racist much?
04/10/2011 01:52:48 PM
- 1020 Views
Re: I have to "Wow" as well... racist much?
04/10/2011 04:42:47 PM
- 1128 Views
oh well that makes it all better...
04/10/2011 04:54:14 PM
- 1130 Views
Yikes. Even for religion, that's more than a little crazy.
04/10/2011 03:47:56 PM
- 1114 Views
I don't think there's much of a difference in crazy as opposed to other more mainstream religions.
04/10/2011 07:08:06 PM
- 1079 Views
A difference exists if only in continued unabashed affirmation of a rather distasteful doctrine.
04/10/2011 11:06:51 PM
- 1068 Views
Then why can't women be priests? Or enter the altar? The curse on Eve is very much in place. *NM*
05/10/2011 12:27:04 AM
- 578 Views
Right now I am not making an absolute statement but a relative one.
05/10/2011 08:37:50 PM
- 866 Views
Oh, you didn't know? Joe Smith said black people are cursed for following Satan.
05/10/2011 01:10:35 AM
- 1061 Views
I guess this is a variation on Hams punishment; Ghav, at least should know better than to be shocked
04/10/2011 04:13:59 PM
- 1004 Views
it's not that we're surprised because it's "novel"
04/10/2011 04:19:16 PM
- 1041 Views
It is not NECESSARILY racist.
04/10/2011 04:39:33 PM
- 1063 Views
Sure, except ...
04/10/2011 04:50:53 PM
- 1094 Views
Well, the funny thing is Christian doctrine presupposes everyone, along with their ancestors...
04/10/2011 06:31:13 PM
- 984 Views
It it is nigh impossible to be a "non-Nicene Christian."
04/10/2011 03:12:06 PM
- 1100 Views
I think we've had this discussion before.
06/10/2011 05:54:39 PM
- 1094 Views
Arianism is a bad comparison for arguing LDS=Christian.
06/10/2011 11:45:36 PM
- 991 Views

Wikipedia confirms what I already thought: you're off base with the monophysitism.
07/10/2011 12:06:40 AM
- 1334 Views
I had not realized it was that late, but used it only as an example of multitudinous controversies.
07/10/2011 01:03:56 AM
- 1427 Views
Monophysites, miaphysites, monothelites, etc. certainly accept the consubstantiality of God/Christ
07/10/2011 11:58:05 AM
- 1021 Views
Virtually everyone has a more sound Christology than Mormons.
07/10/2011 06:45:45 PM
- 1079 Views
Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
08/10/2011 05:30:38 PM
- 1091 Views
I can see that with the Monothelites (can see their appeal, in fact,) but not Monophysites.
07/10/2011 09:43:27 PM
- 986 Views
Tempting as it is to prove Joel wrong (since he so frequently is), I need to take issue with this.
07/10/2011 06:59:13 PM
- 1073 Views
I was just saying there were competing views.
07/10/2011 07:49:26 PM
- 1460 Views
Oh, there were definitely competing views, just not competing Christian views.
07/10/2011 09:26:22 PM
- 972 Views
That sounds really nice.
04/10/2011 06:38:29 PM
- 1051 Views
Why wait though?
05/10/2011 12:12:21 AM
- 1220 Views
So that Vivien can avoid reading and thinking about the stuff that you just wrote. *NM*
05/10/2011 12:28:23 AM
- 556 Views
I really want an answer from a mormon.
05/10/2011 08:48:49 PM
- 1069 Views
Good luck with that; just because I can see no explanation save that I offered does not preclude one
06/10/2011 07:03:50 AM
- 980 Views
Yeah, that's what I thought.
06/10/2011 05:43:57 PM
- 978 Views
Oh no you idn't... *waves finger and weaves head*
04/10/2011 03:53:07 AM
- 883 Views
....i don't know what you look like
04/10/2011 03:54:56 AM
- 1012 Views
Shoot, my Mick Jagger strut is way better than my angry hispanic girl head/finger bob and weave.
*NM*
05/10/2011 04:58:53 AM
- 691 Views

Off-Topic
05/10/2011 01:14:16 AM
- 994 Views
Hmm
05/10/2011 02:03:13 AM
- 1177 Views
True
05/10/2011 02:13:00 AM
- 967 Views
I think of Protestantism in terms similar to a Xerox copy.
05/10/2011 04:57:42 AM
- 1082 Views
Re: Off-Topic
05/10/2011 02:56:50 AM
- 1222 Views
Uhh...
05/10/2011 03:08:49 AM
- 1004 Views
The people at the Nicene Council and the other councils were not prophets.
05/10/2011 04:59:50 AM
- 1122 Views
Danny is right, it is a pretty tough crowd, but better tough than weak and whitewashed.
04/10/2011 04:02:16 AM
- 1054 Views