Active Users:1935 Time:23/01/2025 05:05:16 PM
I think it's safe to say ... Nate Send a noteboard - 04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM
Perhaps its a case of living and dying by the sword or perhaps I tend to bring out the hypocrite in people or I suppose its altogether possible I've simply lumped quite a few of you in a category with ideals that hold no sway for you; however, I've generally made a rule for myself to behave in a well mannered fashion with those who who are themselves capable of proper discourse and possessing of some not all together manufactured integrity.


... that you do indeed tend to bring the hypocrite out in people. Everyone has a little hypocrite inside them. Mine doesn't really like you, and I think that's his prerogative. I'm not particularly feeling up for ShitFest 2011, but if you want to go for it I suppose I'll sit and watch.

I can't speak for everyone, but my own personal rules for being nice to people actually and surprisingly sound close to yours even though I feel we employ these rules in very different ways. In short, be nice to people who are nice, but don't feel any need to extend the same courtesy to people who are not nice. Why do you expect people to be nice to you when you aren't nice to others? You seem to feel that they deserve it, and there certainly are people who insult you for your inflammatory opinions before you directly assault them, but I'm having a hard time seeing how it is so in this case. Whether you have something against Mormonism or not (I'm ambivalent and non-religious, ambiviligious you might say), you directly attempted to insult him though he himself had done nothing to you that I am aware of. That's what I was responding to.

Do you feel that it was unfair of me to say what I've said given that in my eyes you are the one who first insulted someone with neither provocation nor justification? If so I would be happy to continue discussing this grievance. If I remember correctly, so far I have said that I feel you should be banned, that I think you are unintentionally hilarious, and that I find your posts to often be mean-spirited, misogynistic, or vainglorious. Oh, and that you are an attention seeker. I'm not sure which of those is particularly out of line, given the circumstances. If you feel that a score somehow needs to be evened between us, I can help you with that. I am sometimes judgmental, I am unreasonably stubborn in my lifestyle choices, I am fairly anti-social and not very good at it when I try to be otherwise, I'm crap at speaking to girls (but a few of them have somehow liked me anyway), I am a good writer but not nearly as good as I used to like to think I was, I probably couldn't take a bear in a fair fight, I'm starting to get balding, I'm only in average physical shape, I had a failed long distance relationship that may have been ill-considered but will never be regretted, I'm an unrepentant Canadian with socialist leanings, I can stink up the bathroom something godawful fierce when I put my mind to it, I sometimes get upset at people in posts and express my feelings only to find myself unwilling to actually fight with a person because fighting actually kind of sucks and I can usually end up seeing their point of view even if they never so much as try to see mine, I write some boring ass shit sometimes, I've only been punched once in my life and it was by a girl, I occasionally fail at objectivity and don't think that's always a bad thing, I'm a picky eater, I have terrible eyesight, I feel unreasonable pride at the tiny amount of popularity I have (or used to have) here even though at the end of the day I don't put much stock in it, I think hockey is cool, I can't belch the alphabet, I don't drink or smoke or really have any sort of vice outside of video games and junk food and that probably makes me boring, I like big butts and I cannot lie, and this one time in Mexico I ... no, nevermind about that one.
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
This message has been locked.
This message last edited by Nate on 04/10/2011 at 04:11:26 AM
  • Edit 1 by Nate on 04/10/2011 at 04:11:26 AM
Reply to message
Mormons - 03/10/2011 05:46:10 AM 2401 Views
Questions. - 03/10/2011 11:13:25 AM 1149 Views
Ooh! Ooh! - 03/10/2011 11:18:38 AM 1003 Views
I don't watch it. - 04/10/2011 01:34:53 AM 1007 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:28:28 PM 1107 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:31:13 PM 938 Views
Why did I look up what Quorn is? I didn't need to know that. *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:04:20 PM 641 Views
Wyld Stallyns!! - 03/10/2011 03:26:54 PM 935 Views
STATION! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:00:35 PM 564 Views
Re: One of the best replies, ever, on the internet. *NM* - 06/10/2011 02:43:07 AM 618 Views
....did we just get door-to-door'd...ONLINE?!?! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:34:19 AM 586 Views
Nope. - 04/10/2011 01:32:43 AM 991 Views
there's no real point to it - 04/10/2011 02:37:24 AM 1988 Views
We could use an evil cackling smilie, we do have some other evil ones - 04/10/2011 02:49:12 AM 959 Views
wasn't going to argue... *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:57:00 AM 559 Views
Do you ever giggle at the name "Moroni?" - 03/10/2011 11:39:55 AM 1057 Views
There are Mormon literalists? Seriously? *NM* - 03/10/2011 03:02:18 PM 580 Views
I know they don't have multiple wives anymore, so no misconception there - 03/10/2011 01:23:50 PM 979 Views
There are Fundamentalist "Mormons" who do... - 03/10/2011 11:32:56 PM 905 Views
Don't get me wrong by the way, I've met wonderful Mormons - 04/10/2011 12:22:03 PM 953 Views
Question: Why are you such a faggot? *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:23:45 PM 484 Views
Answer: because it's the only way he could return your burning love for him. - 03/10/2011 03:24:23 PM 706 Views
Oh dont be such a fuddy duddy. - 03/10/2011 10:42:06 PM 596 Views
Better a faggot than a fuckwad. Cheers fuckwad! *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:27:20 AM 601 Views
Well, I suppose you'ld be the one to know. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:54:35 AM 533 Views
Really? You really just pulled a "takes one to know one"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 04:19:22 PM 634 Views
Re: You embarrass yourself. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:56:02 AM 490 Views
I'll tell you whats embarresing... - 04/10/2011 02:08:02 AM 815 Views
That is hilarious. - 04/10/2011 03:10:50 AM 706 Views
Goodness.. - 04/10/2011 03:20:30 AM 645 Views
Re: - 04/10/2011 03:28:25 AM 678 Views
You know, my mother had a saying. - 04/10/2011 03:39:32 AM 714 Views
I think it's safe to say ... - 04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM 611 Views
I'm not sure which would be sadder... - 04/10/2011 11:32:55 AM 751 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 12:19:01 PM 572 Views
Re: You flatter me. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:31:01 PM 596 Views
OK, you need to delete the "Re:" You're using it incorrectly - 04/10/2011 01:55:53 PM 625 Views
"Re" doesn't have to mean "reply", it can also mean "regarding". - 04/10/2011 02:01:31 PM 652 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:06:58 PM 653 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:12:57 PM 621 Views
Re: Also. - 04/10/2011 02:08:15 PM 666 Views
you are still using it incorrectly. *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:09:48 PM 609 Views
He's doing it on purpose though. - 04/10/2011 03:31:39 PM 729 Views
Re: Yeah, it's just a shtick... - 04/10/2011 03:47:17 PM 620 Views
Those were the good old days. - 04/10/2011 04:02:33 PM 648 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 10:02:30 PM 552 Views
I agree, it's driving me nuts *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:36:45 PM 540 Views
That's not quite right, actually. - 04/10/2011 03:25:54 PM 563 Views
Disagree. *NM* - 04/10/2011 10:04:09 PM 572 Views
Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. - 04/10/2011 02:32:56 AM 610 Views
Heh. Oh, Ryan. - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM 731 Views
*sigh* to all of you above.... - 04/10/2011 03:06:21 AM 647 Views
I thought that was "Do not talk about /b/"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:12:52 AM 634 Views
i don't know, but if THAT is the first rule... - 04/10/2011 03:41:20 AM 594 Views
Please explain why you think we should consider you Christians. - 03/10/2011 04:33:06 PM 1135 Views
you know, that does make me wonder though - 03/10/2011 04:58:21 PM 1034 Views
We're not as immovable as we are sometimes portrayed. - 03/10/2011 05:27:17 PM 1009 Views
"Even Christ didn't do that"? I can't agree. - 03/10/2011 09:00:34 PM 981 Views
I conceded your last point. - 03/10/2011 10:14:28 PM 888 Views
Point of Anal Retentive Dissent: - 04/10/2011 03:54:00 PM 914 Views
That concept is alien to the Christian theological understanding, however. - 03/10/2011 10:18:55 PM 995 Views
I understand what both you and Danny are saying - 04/10/2011 12:19:57 AM 947 Views
Oh, that's very simple - 04/10/2011 04:02:24 AM 965 Views
I honestly don't know what it would take. - 04/10/2011 07:41:55 AM 972 Views
thank you, both of you - 04/10/2011 01:46:05 PM 959 Views
I love the Nicene Creed. It is such an excellent encapsulation. - 03/10/2011 06:07:53 PM 1037 Views
Agreed. - 04/10/2011 04:44:49 PM 925 Views
The absolute best part about your post (plus the best thing about Mo's/LDS's) - 03/10/2011 09:02:17 PM 976 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 03/10/2011 10:10:39 PM 1083 Views
Though they can cause interesting changes in patterns. - 03/10/2011 10:16:55 PM 983 Views
We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all mankind, and the only way back to God. - 04/10/2011 01:29:30 AM 1069 Views
If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 03:57:08 AM 1228 Views
I never said well-written, I said complex. - 04/10/2011 07:04:24 AM 1105 Views
Ignore facts all you want to. - 05/10/2011 01:07:35 AM 1003 Views
Re: If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 07:24:27 AM 1210 Views
Woah nelly. - 04/10/2011 10:04:33 AM 1016 Views
I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 01:52:48 PM 933 Views
Re: I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 04:42:47 PM 1037 Views
oh well that makes it all better... - 04/10/2011 04:54:14 PM 1056 Views
Exactly - 04/10/2011 06:00:54 PM 942 Views
Was the twin banging and the gay wedding the same event? - 04/10/2011 06:36:03 PM 1017 Views
I guess this is a variation on Hams punishment; Ghav, at least should know better than to be shocked - 04/10/2011 04:13:59 PM 917 Views
it's not that we're surprised because it's "novel" - 04/10/2011 04:19:16 PM 964 Views
It is not NECESSARILY racist. - 04/10/2011 04:39:33 PM 970 Views
Sure, except ... - 04/10/2011 04:50:53 PM 1004 Views
Yeah, circular logic is fun, isn't it? - 05/10/2011 01:09:25 AM 928 Views
That sounds really nice. - 04/10/2011 06:38:29 PM 958 Views
Why wait though? - 05/10/2011 12:12:21 AM 1135 Views
So that Vivien can avoid reading and thinking about the stuff that you just wrote. *NM* - 05/10/2011 12:28:23 AM 524 Views
Ack, not reading and thinking111 - 05/10/2011 12:36:11 AM 960 Views
Yeah, that's what I thought. - 06/10/2011 05:43:57 PM 884 Views
I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 06/10/2011 08:51:15 PM 1134 Views
Re: I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 07/10/2011 07:45:29 PM 970 Views
Oh no you idn't... *waves finger and weaves head* - 04/10/2011 03:53:07 AM 797 Views
....i don't know what you look like - 04/10/2011 03:54:56 AM 933 Views
Took the words right out of my mouth, repeatedly. - 04/10/2011 12:49:13 PM 1136 Views
Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 01:14:16 AM 915 Views
Hmm - 05/10/2011 02:03:13 AM 1092 Views
True - 05/10/2011 02:13:00 AM 888 Views
I think of Protestantism in terms similar to a Xerox copy. - 05/10/2011 04:57:42 AM 991 Views
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM 1116 Views
I like that analogy - an echo chamber! *NM* - 08/10/2011 10:44:04 PM 562 Views
Re: Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 02:56:50 AM 1116 Views
Uhh... - 05/10/2011 03:08:49 AM 931 Views
The people at the Nicene Council and the other councils were not prophets. - 05/10/2011 04:59:50 AM 1042 Views
And you know that because... why, again? - 05/10/2011 07:13:53 AM 968 Views
Tough Crowd. - 03/10/2011 04:44:31 PM 1081 Views
No questions. Have a nice day. - 03/10/2011 11:40:58 PM 936 Views
Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:58:16 AM 647 Views
Re: Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? - 04/10/2011 05:23:12 PM 1039 Views