Active Users:482 Time:07/04/2025 05:13:43 AM
Re: Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. Urza Send a noteboard - 04/10/2011 02:37:41 AM
"Homosexuality Is sin: Next to the crime of murder comes the sin of sexual impurity." Excerpt from a 2002 Mormon pamphlet.

"We do not intend to admit to our campus any homosexuals. If any of you have this tendency and have not completely abandoned it, may I suggest that you leave the university immediately after this assembly. ... We do not want others on this campus to be contaminated by your presence." Ernest Wilkinson, former president of Brigham Young University.


Hell, if that isnt the definitin of faggotry I don't know what is. Preaching christian tolerance and than whining and bashing on the gays? Thats not just faggotry thats mother fucking faggotry with a god damn cherry on top.

But anyway. To the people that continue to nag at Adam, do you really think you're helping the situation? "Ah, yes, Adam called him a faggot. This gives me leave to (attempt to) insult him." Really? Double standards?

Besides, by what "rules" would Adam be banned? This is an open forum: we don't have rules. Go check the top. If we had rules, they would clearly outline what is appropriate, and what is inappropriate. We have certainly adopted standards of practice from Wotmania, but we can't go around banning people because we don't like what they say, at least without a basis for what we are doing, especially if there is nothing that prohibits the action. I continually see people critizing Adam for what he says. I don't have a problem with it; it's his opinion, and he is often mildly amusing. But going and complaining at people in what you perceive as "rude" while being "rude" yourself is only degrading the conversation to the point of asininity.


Anarchy brotha!
Reply to message
Mormons - 03/10/2011 05:46:10 AM 2451 Views
Questions. - 03/10/2011 11:13:25 AM 1192 Views
Ooh! Ooh! - 03/10/2011 11:18:38 AM 1055 Views
I don't watch it. - 04/10/2011 01:34:53 AM 1061 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:28:28 PM 1168 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:31:13 PM 992 Views
Why did I look up what Quorn is? I didn't need to know that. *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:04:20 PM 653 Views
Wyld Stallyns!! - 03/10/2011 03:26:54 PM 977 Views
STATION! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:00:35 PM 588 Views
Re: One of the best replies, ever, on the internet. *NM* - 06/10/2011 02:43:07 AM 637 Views
....did we just get door-to-door'd...ONLINE?!?! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:34:19 AM 610 Views
Nope. - 04/10/2011 01:32:43 AM 1040 Views
there's no real point to it - 04/10/2011 02:37:24 AM 2058 Views
We could use an evil cackling smilie, we do have some other evil ones - 04/10/2011 02:49:12 AM 1003 Views
wasn't going to argue... *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:57:00 AM 578 Views
Do you ever giggle at the name "Moroni?" - 03/10/2011 11:39:55 AM 1104 Views
There are Mormon literalists? Seriously? *NM* - 03/10/2011 03:02:18 PM 597 Views
I know they don't have multiple wives anymore, so no misconception there - 03/10/2011 01:23:50 PM 1025 Views
There are Fundamentalist "Mormons" who do... - 03/10/2011 11:32:56 PM 942 Views
Don't get me wrong by the way, I've met wonderful Mormons - 04/10/2011 12:22:03 PM 1005 Views
Question: Why are you such a faggot? *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:23:45 PM 502 Views
Answer: because it's the only way he could return your burning love for him. - 03/10/2011 03:24:23 PM 722 Views
Oh dont be such a fuddy duddy. - 03/10/2011 10:42:06 PM 628 Views
Better a faggot than a fuckwad. Cheers fuckwad! *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:27:20 AM 623 Views
Well, I suppose you'ld be the one to know. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:54:35 AM 553 Views
Really? You really just pulled a "takes one to know one"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 04:19:22 PM 654 Views
Re: You embarrass yourself. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:56:02 AM 508 Views
I'll tell you whats embarresing... - 04/10/2011 02:08:02 AM 842 Views
That is hilarious. - 04/10/2011 03:10:50 AM 726 Views
Goodness.. - 04/10/2011 03:20:30 AM 658 Views
Re: - 04/10/2011 03:28:25 AM 694 Views
You know, my mother had a saying. - 04/10/2011 03:39:32 AM 734 Views
I think it's safe to say ... - 04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM 632 Views
I'm not sure which would be sadder... - 04/10/2011 11:32:55 AM 768 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 12:19:01 PM 592 Views
Re: You flatter me. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:31:01 PM 618 Views
OK, you need to delete the "Re:" You're using it incorrectly - 04/10/2011 01:55:53 PM 647 Views
"Re" doesn't have to mean "reply", it can also mean "regarding". - 04/10/2011 02:01:31 PM 674 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:06:58 PM 677 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:12:57 PM 644 Views
Re: Also. - 04/10/2011 02:08:15 PM 685 Views
you are still using it incorrectly. *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:09:48 PM 626 Views
He's doing it on purpose though. - 04/10/2011 03:31:39 PM 753 Views
Re: Yeah, it's just a shtick... - 04/10/2011 03:47:17 PM 647 Views
Those were the good old days. - 04/10/2011 04:02:33 PM 662 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 10:02:30 PM 570 Views
I agree, it's driving me nuts *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:36:45 PM 559 Views
That's not quite right, actually. - 04/10/2011 03:25:54 PM 582 Views
Disagree. *NM* - 04/10/2011 10:04:09 PM 589 Views
Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. - 04/10/2011 02:32:56 AM 624 Views
Re: Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. - 04/10/2011 02:37:41 AM 654 Views
Heh. Oh, Ryan. - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM 759 Views
*sigh* to all of you above.... - 04/10/2011 03:06:21 AM 664 Views
I thought that was "Do not talk about /b/"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:12:52 AM 651 Views
i don't know, but if THAT is the first rule... - 04/10/2011 03:41:20 AM 620 Views
Please explain why you think we should consider you Christians. - 03/10/2011 04:33:06 PM 1187 Views
you know, that does make me wonder though - 03/10/2011 04:58:21 PM 1079 Views
We're not as immovable as we are sometimes portrayed. - 03/10/2011 05:27:17 PM 1061 Views
"Even Christ didn't do that"? I can't agree. - 03/10/2011 09:00:34 PM 1045 Views
I conceded your last point. - 03/10/2011 10:14:28 PM 941 Views
Point of Anal Retentive Dissent: - 04/10/2011 03:54:00 PM 965 Views
That concept is alien to the Christian theological understanding, however. - 03/10/2011 10:18:55 PM 1051 Views
I understand what both you and Danny are saying - 04/10/2011 12:19:57 AM 999 Views
Oh, that's very simple - 04/10/2011 04:02:24 AM 1015 Views
I honestly don't know what it would take. - 04/10/2011 07:41:55 AM 1017 Views
thank you, both of you - 04/10/2011 01:46:05 PM 1005 Views
I love the Nicene Creed. It is such an excellent encapsulation. - 03/10/2011 06:07:53 PM 1090 Views
Agreed. - 04/10/2011 04:44:49 PM 970 Views
The absolute best part about your post (plus the best thing about Mo's/LDS's) - 03/10/2011 09:02:17 PM 1044 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 03/10/2011 10:10:39 PM 1129 Views
Though they can cause interesting changes in patterns. - 03/10/2011 10:16:55 PM 1059 Views
We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all mankind, and the only way back to God. - 04/10/2011 01:29:30 AM 1114 Views
If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 03:57:08 AM 1284 Views
I never said well-written, I said complex. - 04/10/2011 07:04:24 AM 1161 Views
Ignore facts all you want to. - 05/10/2011 01:07:35 AM 1059 Views
Re: If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 07:24:27 AM 1259 Views
Woah nelly. - 04/10/2011 10:04:33 AM 1060 Views
I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 01:52:48 PM 988 Views
Re: I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 04:42:47 PM 1096 Views
oh well that makes it all better... - 04/10/2011 04:54:14 PM 1100 Views
Exactly - 04/10/2011 06:00:54 PM 999 Views
Was the twin banging and the gay wedding the same event? - 04/10/2011 06:36:03 PM 1077 Views
I guess this is a variation on Hams punishment; Ghav, at least should know better than to be shocked - 04/10/2011 04:13:59 PM 971 Views
it's not that we're surprised because it's "novel" - 04/10/2011 04:19:16 PM 1011 Views
It is not NECESSARILY racist. - 04/10/2011 04:39:33 PM 1023 Views
Sure, except ... - 04/10/2011 04:50:53 PM 1059 Views
Yeah, circular logic is fun, isn't it? - 05/10/2011 01:09:25 AM 983 Views
That sounds really nice. - 04/10/2011 06:38:29 PM 1019 Views
Why wait though? - 05/10/2011 12:12:21 AM 1189 Views
So that Vivien can avoid reading and thinking about the stuff that you just wrote. *NM* - 05/10/2011 12:28:23 AM 542 Views
Ack, not reading and thinking111 - 05/10/2011 12:36:11 AM 1009 Views
Yeah, that's what I thought. - 06/10/2011 05:43:57 PM 939 Views
I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 06/10/2011 08:51:15 PM 1185 Views
Re: I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 07/10/2011 07:45:29 PM 1023 Views
Oh no you idn't... *waves finger and weaves head* - 04/10/2011 03:53:07 AM 851 Views
....i don't know what you look like - 04/10/2011 03:54:56 AM 981 Views
Took the words right out of my mouth, repeatedly. - 04/10/2011 12:49:13 PM 1184 Views
Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 01:14:16 AM 951 Views
Hmm - 05/10/2011 02:03:13 AM 1143 Views
True - 05/10/2011 02:13:00 AM 932 Views
I think of Protestantism in terms similar to a Xerox copy. - 05/10/2011 04:57:42 AM 1047 Views
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM 1162 Views
I like that analogy - an echo chamber! *NM* - 08/10/2011 10:44:04 PM 585 Views
Re: Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 02:56:50 AM 1177 Views
Uhh... - 05/10/2011 03:08:49 AM 978 Views
The people at the Nicene Council and the other councils were not prophets. - 05/10/2011 04:59:50 AM 1091 Views
And you know that because... why, again? - 05/10/2011 07:13:53 AM 1020 Views
Tough Crowd. - 03/10/2011 04:44:31 PM 1134 Views
No questions. Have a nice day. - 03/10/2011 11:40:58 PM 980 Views
Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:58:16 AM 666 Views
Re: Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? - 04/10/2011 05:23:12 PM 1092 Views