Active Users:650 Time:25/11/2024 11:44:15 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Eric Cartman was right about the hippies random thoughts Send a noteboard - 28/09/2011 03:34:26 PM
For all the romance about them they turned out to be mostly losers and sell outs. If you want to smoke pot not bathe and have a lot of sex more power to you but when start thinking leeching off society gives you some sort of moral superiority and the right to disrupt other people who are trying to ignore you then you can get maced. Back in the day civil disobedience was for people of conviction who were willing to suffer for the beliefs now it is for bored twenty nothings who see it as a lifestyle choice and who cry like babies when they learn their actions have consequences.
Reply to message
/Survey: The "occupy Wall Street" protest. Aeryn - 28/09/2011 04:31:46 AM 755 Views
are there any counter-protests? aerocontrols - 28/09/2011 05:03:08 AM 459 Views
I'd go to an anti-asshole-cop protest. Ghavrel - 28/09/2011 06:07:16 AM 531 Views
Did anyone? Tom - 28/09/2011 06:51:08 AM 548 Views
yeah with some popcorn to watch the wannabe hippies get pepper sprayed *NM* random thoughts - 28/09/2011 01:28:36 PM 231 Views
Sure. I don't quite understand the hostility you and Tom have beetnemesis - 28/09/2011 02:05:06 PM 413 Views
Eric Cartman was right about the hippies random thoughts - 28/09/2011 03:34:26 PM 529 Views
This is 2011. Calling all protesters "hippies" is like saying everyone in Starbucks is a beatnik beetnemesis - 28/09/2011 04:03:44 PM 486 Views
yes but douchebag hipsters takes doesn't really work random thoughts - 28/09/2011 05:49:01 PM 468 Views
Uh, "back in the day" there were a lot of hippies in the civil disobedience camp. *NM* Ghavrel - 28/09/2011 05:48:36 PM 189 Views
and all why have now is wannabes who cry when the police are mean to them *NM* random thoughts - 28/09/2011 05:50:24 PM 213 Views
That I agree with. *NM* Ghavrel - 29/09/2011 09:09:52 AM 213 Views
What exactly do they want, and how might it be accomplished? Aeryn - 28/09/2011 03:55:32 PM 474 Views
Shrug- like I said, I'm not going to debate the policies beetnemesis - 28/09/2011 04:13:07 PM 427 Views
+1 *NM* ironclad - 29/09/2011 09:42:43 AM 176 Views
Perfectly said. Tom - 28/09/2011 04:38:55 PM 463 Views
I generally agree with this, though my financial knowledge is lacking. Ghavrel - 28/09/2011 05:51:33 PM 457 Views
I cannot speak for them, but imagine there are three overarching complaints. Joel - 28/09/2011 10:24:21 PM 576 Views
*NM* *NM* Aeryn - 28/09/2011 10:45:38 PM 200 Views
Probably, if I didn't have and couldn't find a job in the US. Joel - 28/09/2011 03:29:28 PM 453 Views
A relevant article to this thread, I think beetnemesis - 28/09/2011 07:08:20 PM 707 Views
it isn't be marginalized it is simply not significant random thoughts - 28/09/2011 08:20:15 PM 579 Views
It's not being marginalized. It's not worthy of discussion in the first place to need marginalizing Tom - 28/09/2011 09:25:56 PM 506 Views
so you got to meet Jude Law? *NM* random thoughts - 28/09/2011 11:01:14 PM 197 Views
For all of 5 seconds, yes. *NM* Tom - 29/09/2011 01:43:23 AM 172 Views
Call in the Pinkertons *NM* Urza - 28/09/2011 09:13:21 PM 193 Views
I can at least respect the honesty in that response. Joel - 28/09/2011 09:28:44 PM 669 Views
Re: Yes. *NM* Gaps - 29/09/2011 02:48:38 AM 241 Views
No, I have a life. *NM* everynametaken - 29/09/2011 04:01:50 AM 197 Views
After seeing the cops being ridiculous these lugs are starting to grow on me... *NM* everynametaken - 04/10/2011 01:15:34 AM 199 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes