He was proven guilty when he was convicted. If you want to then get that conviction overturned you have to prove there is a reason to overturn it.
i'm proud to live in a country where you can be executed based on circumstantial evidence...
22/09/2011 04:06:07 PM
- 1388 Views
And yet the Supreme Court didn't stop it. You're a lawyer right?
22/09/2011 04:19:05 PM
- 759 Views
Well, that right there was an ignorant thing to say.
22/09/2011 04:32:49 PM
- 816 Views
But they get all the media attention
22/09/2011 04:45:03 PM
- 706 Views
Cameron Todd Willingham is white, and his story is a national one since Perry is running for Pres
23/09/2011 03:41:52 PM
- 598 Views
those numbers are less schocking when you consider that blacks commet a lot more murders *NM*
22/09/2011 05:43:51 PM
- 310 Views
And this is a typically illogical argument.
22/09/2011 11:11:48 PM
- 742 Views
You're kidding, right?
23/09/2011 02:55:44 PM
- 690 Views
Re: You're kidding, right?
23/09/2011 07:36:38 PM
- 705 Views
Juror bias. *NM*
23/09/2011 08:35:10 PM
- 276 Views
Your evidence for that? *NM*
23/09/2011 11:33:58 PM
- 285 Views
Twenty-one years of life in the American South.
24/09/2011 12:40:10 AM
- 666 Views
Of course I'm interested
24/09/2011 04:03:51 AM
- 597 Views
From me being too involved with the subject material. I apologize.
24/09/2011 11:16:06 AM
- 579 Views
While I largely agree with your argument, I agree more with Cannoli on the NAACP.
23/09/2011 07:46:06 PM
- 642 Views
Huh.
22/09/2011 04:47:20 PM
- 773 Views
That jumped out at me too.
22/09/2011 04:50:52 PM
- 692 Views
What really confuses me
22/09/2011 04:58:32 PM
- 650 Views
That's a good question and I really wish it would be addressed.
22/09/2011 05:05:40 PM
- 735 Views
Re: That's a good question and I really wish it would be addressed.
22/09/2011 05:21:59 PM
- 787 Views
If the original trial is shown to be flawed that's supposed to require a new trial.
22/09/2011 08:25:51 PM
- 628 Views
Well...
22/09/2011 05:18:54 PM
- 801 Views
So if I understand you correctly...
22/09/2011 05:23:00 PM
- 740 Views
Yes, that is correct. And proving witness coercion is likely to be difficult if not impossible. *NM*
22/09/2011 05:30:37 PM
- 251 Views
it is only confusing because the evidence isn't really that shaky
22/09/2011 08:54:21 PM
- 674 Views
you are innocent until proven guilty
22/09/2011 05:34:57 PM
- 717 Views
If I understand the Supreme Court correctly, the reason they denied the stay of execution was
22/09/2011 08:25:14 PM
- 725 Views
I completely support the Death Penalty without question.....
22/09/2011 08:27:54 PM
- 628 Views
Unreasonable doubt is impossible to eliminate.
22/09/2011 09:54:43 PM
- 706 Views
Doubt can be eliminated.....any question about Dalmer?
23/09/2011 01:00:52 PM
- 680 Views
Maybe he was framed by an enemy, government conspiracy or aliens.
23/09/2011 01:54:21 PM
- 648 Views
Jigga what? *NM*
23/09/2011 03:36:07 PM
- 314 Views
"I do not know if I was then a man dreaming I was a butterfly or am now a butterfly..."
23/09/2011 06:50:34 PM
- 628 Views
Circumstantial evidence is not, I believe, a bar to conviction.
22/09/2011 09:43:56 PM
- 593 Views
Regarding the salvation thing, that is an argument FOR the death penalty, in my mind.
22/09/2011 11:37:16 PM
- 658 Views
That motive is seflish and thus fatal.
23/09/2011 01:17:00 AM
- 611 Views
Bullshit
25/09/2011 03:53:05 AM
- 838 Views
Where do YOU get the idea that imperfect contrition is good enough?
25/09/2011 02:29:18 PM
- 1111 Views
Thank God you're not an evangelist.
23/09/2011 02:59:06 PM
- 629 Views
And I pity the souls you have ministered to. They're in for a rude shock at their judgement
25/09/2011 04:01:05 AM
- 659 Views
lol roman catholicism *NM*
25/09/2011 04:39:55 AM
- 262 Views
Not just Roman Catholics, y'know, everyone who thinks God was not BSing about judgement.
25/09/2011 09:47:12 PM
- 693 Views
lol hellfire and brimstone *NM*
26/09/2011 12:12:28 AM
- 256 Views
I suppose in a consequences free world everything is a source of amusement.
26/09/2011 12:33:14 AM
- 820 Views
You really don't understand irony, do you? Particularly as it applies to your post about this case.
22/09/2011 11:26:49 PM
- 722 Views
.
23/09/2011 08:21:38 AM
- 664 Views
A list of anecdotal wrongs does not prove anything. If convictions can be wrong, so can exonerations *NM*
25/09/2011 04:03:26 AM
- 260 Views
sorry if i don't have time to link to every thing i've read on the subject
23/09/2011 02:54:50 PM
- 785 Views
Well I would think you would have picked an article that offers some iota of proof of his innocence.
25/09/2011 04:14:45 AM
- 713 Views
Well, I wouldn't call eyewitness accounts circumstancial evidence.
23/09/2011 11:45:48 PM
- 647 Views
Nor would I, but I've heard that lawyers say, "an eye witness is the worst witness you can have."
25/09/2011 03:23:53 PM
- 674 Views