But sorry as compelling as you may find your argument you are ignoring the fact that at no time before 9-11 did Bush advocate attacking anyone. He was president for months before the attack and never mentioned it. If you are going to argue that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11 you will need show that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11 and not that some people who advised him thought Iraq was a threat before 9-11.
You're the one who brought up Bush specifically. What I originally said was, and I quote, "I think the administration at the time capitalized on it in order to achieve their goal of attacking Iraq, but there's no way they actually caused 9/11 themselves."
I did not say Bush. You said Bush, in your reply to me. In my reply to you, I focused once again on the administration around Bush and the PNAC connections. It seems to me that you are having some sort of disconnect here about everything I'm saying. Not once in any of my posts here have I said, in your words "that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11". I dare you to find a place where I said that. If you can't, I would be happy if you'd admit that you've completely misunderstood me.
I'm fine with criticism, but only if it's based on things I actually said, not things you imagined me saying.
Warder to starry_nite
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools.
20/09/2011 06:50:36 AM
- 1213 Views
Logic classes would be good in schools.
20/09/2011 10:23:56 AM
- 762 Views
Ugh.
20/09/2011 11:30:59 AM
- 750 Views
Re: Ugh.
21/09/2011 12:03:31 AM
- 708 Views
Something tells me that no matter who answered your questions you wouldn't believe anyway.
21/09/2011 02:16:52 AM
- 727 Views
this is a controlled demolition
21/09/2011 12:20:09 AM
- 831 Views
I've seen controlled demolitions in person. They happen in the opposite order of the WTC collapses.
21/09/2011 03:54:35 AM
- 757 Views
Agreed
20/09/2011 01:09:40 PM
- 705 Views
I've long advocated this for the reasons Tom states as well as others.
21/09/2011 06:49:28 AM
- 663 Views
I don't know if the Internet is degrading skills, or just giving stupid people a voice
20/09/2011 02:33:24 PM
- 775 Views
There is compelling evidence that 9/11 was not what it seemed
20/09/2011 03:06:58 PM
- 792 Views
No, there is not.
20/09/2011 03:19:43 PM
- 869 Views
Well, the circumstances were odd at least
20/09/2011 03:26:40 PM
- 749 Views
As far as conspiracies go ...
20/09/2011 03:36:35 PM
- 811 Views
what would be the motive for the US doing something that stupid?
20/09/2011 04:40:31 PM
- 671 Views
I'm not sure you got my gist.
20/09/2011 04:46:28 PM
- 674 Views
I don't think there is any evidience that Bush wanted to attack Iraq before 9-11
20/09/2011 05:21:09 PM
- 727 Views
Um. Well, sure, that would be true. If you ignored all the evidence.
20/09/2011 05:45:23 PM
- 781 Views
Well if you had argued that some Bush advisers wanted to attack Iraq I would have agreed
20/09/2011 06:35:07 PM
- 764 Views
But that's what I DID argue.
20/09/2011 06:47:17 PM
- 753 Views
sorry but you need to be more precise in your terms
21/09/2011 02:37:36 PM
- 748 Views
I've always seen them as separate.
21/09/2011 03:33:14 PM
- 600 Views
And the explicit statement of a Bush Cabinet member.
21/09/2011 06:59:47 AM
- 842 Views
I'm still annoyed.
21/09/2011 01:58:38 PM
- 656 Views
I stopped responfding when suddenly realized I didn't want to be in a Bush Iraq war debate
21/09/2011 02:53:29 PM
- 650 Views
and I pointed that it was was just continuin gthe Clinton policy
21/09/2011 02:30:13 PM
- 726 Views
Even if that were true, it would still be flip flopping on a central Bush platform plank.
21/09/2011 05:45:10 PM
- 761 Views
In addition:
20/09/2011 05:57:33 PM
- 765 Views
Contemplate this....
20/09/2011 04:27:52 PM
- 739 Views
You just did not go Star Trek on me
20/09/2011 04:44:28 PM
- 734 Views
You should watch the pilot episode of the X-Files spin-off series The Lone Gunmen.
20/09/2011 08:19:15 PM
- 790 Views
Make 'em all take debate.
20/09/2011 08:23:37 PM
- 729 Views
Re: We really need to have Logic as a course in high schools.
21/09/2011 12:10:08 AM
- 718 Views
Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...?
21/09/2011 01:05:18 AM
- 709 Views
Not actually the best example
21/09/2011 01:56:03 AM
- 697 Views
what about the hole it cut into the frame of the building?
21/09/2011 03:23:07 AM
- 735 Views
The fireproofing was scraped off the steel by the crash, so the beams melted.
21/09/2011 07:35:08 PM
- 918 Views
Re: Yeah, and the 100,000 pounds of sudden extra weight slammed into the towers at 400 mph...?
21/09/2011 03:02:19 AM
- 762 Views
You would force Euler on to the masses?
21/09/2011 03:21:40 PM
- 786 Views
You could still argue.
21/09/2011 04:06:51 PM
- 645 Views
I didn't mean to imply that it is no fun to argue with a like-minded person
21/09/2011 04:15:47 PM
- 677 Views
Or they could just do more math. Cold, hard, beautiful math.
21/09/2011 04:01:05 PM
- 668 Views
Now we are talking... Everyone can benefit from some basic Euclid.
21/09/2011 08:32:17 PM
- 927 Views
I really and truly appreciate your love of pure math for math's sake, but...
21/09/2011 11:10:03 PM
- 699 Views
Well, it requires a lot more science to really dispute things than HS can give someone
21/09/2011 11:28:29 PM
- 724 Views